November 2013 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Binding of Isaac, you may be blocked from editing. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to T-beam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • who would rightly test more than one complex structure; for example, Cheng, Mohammed, and Mustapha (2009 and Hashim Fidow 2014 tested pretension inverted T-beams with circular web openings (p. 203),

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Closed-circuit television seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Router (computing). Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 16:21, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Flappychappy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to SuperBrawl— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flappychappy (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to SuperBrawl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flappychappy (talk) 15:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hornswoggle, you may be blocked from editing. Scjessey (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to No Way Out (2002). Serols (talk) 16:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Twelve Tribes of Israel, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Seba (musician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Flooded with them hundreds 12:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2019 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not use deceptive edit summaries. Your recent edits are obviously not correcting typos. David Biddulph (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fiddler on the Roof (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pablo Fornals, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 14:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Suonii180. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jude Hill, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Suonii180 (talk) 15:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Benjamin Alexander (skier). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 18:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Daniel Dubois (boxer), you may be blocked from editing. – 2.O.Boxing 16:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Dubois (boxer). – 2.O.Boxing 19:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jami Attenberg, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – 2.O.Boxing 19:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mark Wright (TV personality), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Daniel Dubois edit

You need to discuss your edit on the article talk page. – 2.O.Boxing 20:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Victor Lindelöf. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Socotra, you may be blocked from editing. – 2.O.Boxing 14:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Benoît Assou-Ekotto. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Willie Hogg. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.2.O.Boxing 18:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. – 2.O.Boxing 21:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Alistair McDowall. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 21:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bobby Zamora. Egghead06 (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Heather Havrilesky. CodeTalker (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyobons mots 20:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply