Open main menu

Surveillance cameras on the corner of a building.
Dome CCTV cameras.
Dome camera in a rail station

Closed-circuit television (CCTV), also known as video surveillance,[1][2] is the use of video cameras to transmit a signal to a specific place, on a limited set of monitors. It differs from broadcast television in that the signal is not openly transmitted, though it may employ point-to-point (P2P), point-to-multipoint (P2MP), or mesh wired or wireless links. Though almost all video cameras fit this definition, the term is most often applied to those used for surveillance in areas that may need monitoring such as banks, stores, and other areas where security is needed. Though videotelephony is seldom called 'CCTV' one exception is the use of video in distance education, where it is an important tool.[3][4]

Surveillance of the public using CCTV is common in many areas around the world. In recent years, the use of body worn video cameras has been introduced as a new form of surveillance, often used in law enforcement, with cameras located on a police officer's chest or head.[5] Video surveillance has generated significant debate about balancing its use with individuals' right to privacy even when in public.[6][7]

In industrial plants, CCTV equipment may be used to observe parts of a process from a central control room, for example when the environment is not suitable for humans. CCTV systems may operate continuously or only as required to monitor a particular event. A more advanced form of CCTV, utilizing digital video recorders (DVRs), provides recording for possibly many years, with a variety of quality and performance options and extra features (such as motion detection and email alerts). More recently, decentralized IP cameras, perhaps equipped with megapixel sensors, support recording directly to network-attached storage devices, or internal flash for completely stand-alone operation.

There are about 350 million surveillance cameras worldwide as of 2016. About 65% of these cameras are installed in Asia. The growth of CCTV has been slowing in recent years. [8]

HistoryEdit

 
Closed circuit TV monitoring at the Central Police Control Station, Munich Germany in 1973.
 
Desk in one of the regional control-rooms of the National Police in the Netherlands in 2017.
 
CCTV control-room monitor wall for 176 open-street cameras in 2017.

An early mechanical CCTV system was developed in June 1927 by Russian physicist Léon Theremin[9] (cf. Television in the Soviet Union). Originally requested by the Soviet of Labor and Defense, the system comprised a manually-operated scanning-transmitting camera and wireless shortwave transmitter and receiver, with a resolution of a hundred lines. Having commandeered by Kliment Voroshilov, Theremin's CCTV system was demonstrated to Joseph Stalin, Semyon Budyonny, and Sergo Ordzhonikidze, and subsequently installed in the courtyard of the Moscow Kremlin to monitor approaching visitors as a means of state surveillance.[9]

Another early CCTV system was installed by Siemens AG at Test Stand VII in Peenemünde, Nazi Germany in 1942, for observing the launch of V-2 rockets.[10]

In the U.S. the first commercial closed-circuit television system became available in 1949, called Vericon. Very little is known about Vericon except it was advertised as not requiring a government permit.[11]

TechnologyEdit

The earliest video surveillance systems involved constant monitoring because there was no way to record and store information. The development of reel-to-reel media enabled the recording of surveillance footage. These systems required magnetic tapes to be changed manually, which was a time consuming, expensive and unreliable process, with the operator having to manually thread the tape from the tape reel through the recorder onto an empty take-up reel. Due to these shortcomings, video surveillance was not widespread. VCR technology became available in the 1970s, making it easier to record and erase information, and the use of video surveillance became more common.[12]

During the 1990s, digital multiplexing was developed, allowing several cameras to record at once, as well as time lapse and motion-only recording. This saved time and money which then led to an increase in the use of CCTV.[13]

Recently CCTV technology has been enhanced with a shift toward Internet-based products and systems, and other technological developments.[14]

ApplicationEdit

Closed-circuit television was used as a form of pay-per-view theatre television for sports such as professional boxing and professional wrestling, and from 1964 through 1970, the Indianapolis 500 automobile race. Boxing telecasts were broadcast live to a select number of venues, mostly theaters, where viewers paid for tickets to watch the fight live.[15][16] The first fight with a closed-circuit telecast was Joe Louis vs. Joe Walcott in 1948.[17] Closed-circuit telecasts peaked in popularity with Muhammad Ali in the 1960s and 1970s,[15][16] with "The Rumble in the Jungle" fight drawing 50 million CCTV viewers worldwide in 1974,[18] and the "Thrilla in Manila" drawing 100 million CCTV viewers worldwide in 1975.[19] In 1985, the WrestleMania I professional wrestling show was seen by over one million viewers with this scheme.[20] As late as 1996, the Julio César Chávez vs. Oscar De La Hoya boxing fight had 750,000 viewers.[21] Closed-circuit television was gradually replaced by pay-per-view home cable television in the 1980s and 1990s.[16]

In September 1968, Olean, New York was the first city in the United States to install video cameras along its main business street in an effort to fight crime.[22] Another early appearance was in 1973 in Times Square in New York City.[23] The NYPD installed it in order to deter crime that was occurring in the area; however, crime rates did not appear to drop much due to the cameras.[23] Nevertheless, during the 1980s video surveillance began to spread across the country specifically targeting public areas.[13] It was seen as a cheaper way to deter crime compared to increasing the size of the police departments.[23] Some businesses as well, especially those that were prone to theft, began to use video surveillance.[23] From the mid-1990s on, police departments across the country installed an increasing number of cameras in various public spaces including housing projects, schools and public parks departments.[23] CCTV later became common in banks and stores to discourage theft, by recording evidence of criminal activity. In 1998, 3,000 CCTV systems were in use in New York City.[24]

Experiments in the UK during the 1970s and 1980s, including outdoor CCTV in Bournemouth in 1985, led to several larger trial programs later that decade. The first use by local government was in King's Lynn, Norfolk, in 1987.[25]

UsesEdit

Crime preventionEdit

 
The two-year-old James Bulger being led away by his killers, recorded on shopping centre CCTV in 1993. This narrow-bandwidth television system had a low frame rate.
 
Sign warning that premises are watched by CCTV cameras.

A 2009 systematic review by researchers from Northeastern University and University of Cambridge used meta-analytic techniques to pool the average effect of CCTV on crime across 41 different studies.[26]

The studies included in the meta-analysis used quasi-experimental evaluation designs that involve before-and-after measures of crime in experimental and control areas.[26] However, several researchers have pointed to methodological problems associated with this research literature. First, researchers have argued that the British car park studies included in the meta-analysis cannot accurately control for the fact that CCTV was introduced simultaneously with a range of other security-related measures.[27] Second, some have noted that, in many of the studies, there may be issues with selection bias since the introduction of CCTV was potentially endogenous to previous crime trends.[28] In particular, the estimated effects may be biased if CCTV is introduced in response to crime trends.[29]

It has been argued that problems of selection bias and endogeneity can be addressed by stronger research designs such as randomized controlled trials and natural experiments. A 2017 review published in Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention compiles seven studies that use such research designs. The studies included in the review found that CCTV reduced crime by 24-28% in public streets and urban subway stations. It also found that CCTV could decrease unruly behaviour in football stadiums and theft in supermarkets/mass merchant stores. However, there was no evidence of CCTV having desirable effects in parking facilities or suburban subway stations. Furthermore, the review indicates that CCTV is more effective in preventing property crimes than in violent crimes.[30]

 
Closed-circuit video cameras in the Navy Yard complex caught gunman Aaron Alexis during his shooting rampage.

Another question in the effectiveness of CCTV for policing is around uptime of the system; in 2013 City of Philadelphia Auditor found that the $15M system was operational only 32% of the time.[31] There is strong anecdotal evidence that CCTV aids in detection and conviction of offenders; indeed UK police forces routinely seek CCTV recordings after crimes.[32]. Moreover, CCTV has played a crucial role in tracing the movements of suspects or victims and is widely regarded by anti-terrorist officers as a fundamental tool in tracking terrorist suspects. Large-scale CCTV installations have played a key part of the defenses against terrorism since the 1970s. Cameras have also been installed on public transport in the hope of deterring crime.[33][34]

A more open question is whether most CCTV is cost-effective. While low-quality domestic kits are cheap the professional installation and maintenance of high definition CCTV is expensive.[35] Gill and Spriggs did a Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of CCTV in crime prevention that showed little monetary saving with the installation of CCTV as most of the crimes prevented resulted in little monetary loss.[36] Critics however noted that benefits of non-monetary value cannot be captured in a traditional Cost Effectiveness Analysis and were omitted from their study.[36] A 2008 Report by UK Police Chiefs concluded that only 3% of crimes were solved by CCTV.[37] In London, a Metropolitan Police report showed that in 2008 only one crime was solved per 1000 cameras.[38] In some cases CCTV cameras have become a target of attacks themselves.[39]

Cities such as Manchester in the UK are using DVR-based technology to improve accessibility for crime prevention.[40]

In October 2009, an "Internet Eyes" website was announced which would pay members of the public to view CCTV camera images from their homes and report any crimes they witnessed. The site aimed to add "more eyes" to cameras which might be insufficiently monitored. Civil liberties campaigners criticized the idea as "a distasteful and a worrying development".[41]

In 2013 Oaxaca hired deaf police officers to lip read conversations to uncover criminal conspiracies.[42]

In Singapore, since 2012, thousands of CCTV cameras have helped deter loan sharks, nab litterbugs and stop illegal parking, according to government figures.[43]

Crime solvingEdit

CCTV can also be used to help solve crimes. In London alone, six crimes are solved each day through CCTV footage.[44] Sometimes, footage from CCTV camera's of citizens can even be used for this purpose.[45]

Body wornEdit

In recent years, the use of body worn video cameras has been introduced for a number of uses. For example, as a new form of surveillance in law enforcement, with cameras located on a police officer's chest or head.[46][5]

Traffic monitoringEdit

Many cities and motorway networks have extensive traffic-monitoring systems, using closed-circuit television to detect congestion and notice accidents.[47] Many of these cameras however, are owned by private companies and transmit data to drivers' GPS systems.

The UK Highways Agency has a publicly owned CCTV network of over 3000 Pan-Tilt-Zoom cameras covering the British motorway and trunk road network. These cameras are primarily used to monitor traffic conditions and are not used as speed cameras. With the addition of fixed cameras for the active traffic management system, the number of cameras on the Highways Agency's CCTV network is likely to increase significantly over the next few years.[48]

The London congestion charge is enforced by cameras positioned at the boundaries of and inside the congestion charge zone, which automatically read the licence plates of cars. If the driver does not pay the charge then a fine will be imposed.[49] Similar systems are being developed as a means of locating cars reported stolen.[50]

Other surveillance cameras serve as traffic enforcement cameras.[51]

Increasing safety and security in public transportEdit

 
Digital Video Recorder for Public Transport

A CCTV system may be installed where any example, on a driver-only operated train CCTV cameras may allow the driver to confirm that people are clear of doors before closing them and starting the train.[52]

A trial by RET in 2011 with facial recognition cameras mounted on trams made sure that people that were banned from the city trams did not sneak on anyway.[53]

Sporting eventsEdit

Many sporting events in the United States use CCTV inside the venue for fans to see the action while they are away from their seats. The cameras send the feed to a central control center where a producer selects feeds to send to the television monitors that fans can view. CCTV monitors for viewing the event by attendees are often placed in lounges, hallways, and restrooms. In a trial with CCTV camera's, football club fans no longer needed to identify themselves manually, but could pass freely after being authorized by the facial recognition system.[54]

Employee monitoringEdit

Organizations use CCTV to monitor the actions of workers. Every action is recorded as an information block with subtitles that explain the performed operation. This helps to track the actions of workers, especially when they are making critical financial transactions, such as correcting or cancelling of a sale, withdrawing money or altering personal information.

Actions which an employer may wish to monitor could include:

  • Scanning of goods, selection of goods, introduction of price and quantity;
  • Input and output of operators in the system when entering passwords;
  • Deleting operations and modifying existing documents;
  • Implementation of certain operations, such as financial statements or operations with cash;
  • Moving goods, revaluation scrapping and counting;
  • Control in the kitchen of fast food restaurants;
  • Change of settings, reports and other official functions.

Each of these operations is transmitted with a description, allowing detailed monitoring of all actions of the operator. Some systems allow the user to search for a specific event by time of occurrence and text description, and perform statistical evaluation of operator behaviour. This allows the software to predict deviations from the standard workflow and record only anomalous behaviour.[55]

Use in schoolsEdit

In the United States, Britain,[56] Australia[57] and New Zealand, CCTV is widely used in schools due to its success in preventing bullying, vandalism, monitoring visitors and maintaining a record of evidence in the event of a crime. There are some restrictions on installation, with cameras not being installed in an area where there is a "reasonable expectation of privacy", such as bathrooms, gym locker areas and private offices (unless consent by the office occupant is given). Cameras are generally acceptable in hallways, parking lots, front offices where students, employees, and parents come and go, gymnasiums, cafeterias, supply rooms and classrooms. The installation of cameras in classrooms may be objected to by some teachers.[58]

Criminal useEdit

Criminals may use surveillance cameras to monitor the public. For example, a hidden camera at an ATM can capture people's PINs as they are entered, without their knowledge. The devices are small enough not to be noticed, and are placed where they can monitor the keypad of the machine as people enter their PINs. Images may be transmitted wirelessly to the criminal. Even lawful surveillance cameras sometimes have their data go into the hands of people who have no legal right to receive it.[59]

PrevalenceEdit

 
A crowdsourced map of CCTV cameras near Grande Arche using OpenStreetMap data.[60]
 
Surveillance camera mounted on the walls of Rosenbad, one of the Swedish's government buildings in central Stockholm, which houses the Prime Minister's office. One of the parliament's (Riksdagen) building can be seen in the background.
 
A surveillance camera, aimed at a public street (Kungsgatan) in Stockholm, Sweden, mounted on top of the pole.
 
The headquarters of the United Nations in New York, with cameras visible on the side of the UN General Assembly building.

AsiaEdit

About 65% of CCTV cameras in the world are installed in Asia.[8] In Asia, different human activities attracted the use of surveillance camera systems and services, including but not limited to business and related industries,[citation needed] transportation,[61] sports,[62] and care for the environment.[63]

In 2018, China was reported to have a huge surveillance network of over 170 million CCTV cameras with 400 million new cameras expected be installed in the next three years, many of which use facial recognition technology.[64]

United StatesEdit

 
Surveillance camera mounted on a tripod in Sunriver, Oregon.

There were an estimated 30 million surveillance cameras in the United States in 2011.[65] Video surveillance has been common in the United States since the 1990s; for example, one manufacturer reported net earnings of $120 million in 1995.[66] With lower cost and easier installation, sales of home security cameras increased in the early 21st century. Following the September 11 attacks, the use of video surveillance in public places became more common to deter future terrorist attacks.[23] Under the Homeland Security Grant Program, government grants are available for cities to install surveillance camera networks.[67][68][69] In 2009, there were an estimated 15,000 CCTV systems in Chicago, many linked to an integrated camera network.[70][71][72] New York City's Domain Awareness System has 6,000 video surveillance cameras linked together,[73] there are over 4,000 cameras on the subway system (although nearly half of them do not work),[74] and two-thirds of large apartment and commercial buildings use video surveillance cameras.[75][76] In the Washington D.C.-area, there are more than 30,000 surveillance cameras in schools,[77] and the Metro has nearly 6,000 cameras in use across the system.[78]

United KingdomEdit

In the United Kingdom, the vast majority of CCTV cameras are not operated by government bodies, but by private individuals or companies, especially to monitor the interiors of shops and businesses. According to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests, the total number of local government operated CCTV cameras was around 52,000 over the entirety of the UK.[79]

An article published in CCTV Image magazine estimated the number of private and local government operated cameras in the United Kingdom was 1.85 million in 2011. The estimate was based on extrapolating from a comprehensive survey of public and private cameras within the Cheshire Constabulary jurisdiction. This works out as an average of one camera for every 32 people in the UK, although the density of cameras varies greatly from place to place. The Cheshire report also claims that the average person on a typical day would be seen by 70 CCTV cameras.[80]

The Cheshire figure is regarded as more dependable than a previous study by Michael McCahill and Clive Norris of UrbanEye published in 2002.[80][81] Based on a small sample in Putney High Street, McCahill and Norris extrapolated the number of surveillance cameras in Greater London to be around 500,000 and the total number of cameras in the UK to be around 4,200,000. According to their estimate the UK has one camera for every 14 people. Although it has been acknowledged for several years that the methodology behind this figure is flawed,[82] it has been widely quoted. Furthermore, the figure of 500,000 for Greater London is often confused with the figure for the police and local government operated cameras in the City of London, which was about 650 in 2011.[79]

The CCTV User Group estimated that there were around 1.5 million private and local government CCTV cameras in city centres, stations, airports, and major retail areas in the UK.[83]

Research conducted by the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research and based on a survey of all Scottish local authorities, identified that there are over 2,200 public space CCTV cameras in Scotland.[84]

CanadaEdit

Project SCRAM is a policing effort by the Halton Regional Police Service to register and help consumers understand the complex issues of privacy and safety that confront households when dealing with installations of home security systems. "The SCRAM program enables community members to voluntarily identify and register their residential video surveillance equipment through a simple, secure, confidential, online form."[85] It has not been extended to commercial businesses. A wide-ranging effort to provide registration and monitoring of home security and systems. "Security camera registration and monitoring is a community-based crime prevention opportunity and investigative tool that enlists the help of residents and can help prevent crime on three levels. Residential video surveillance cameras can deter criminals from entering the area, can prevent crimes from occurring and help solve crimes by providing valuable evidence to the police."[85]

South AfricaEdit

In South Africa due to the high crime rate CCTV surveillance is widely prevalent but the country has been slow to implement the latest technology e.g. the first IP camera was released in 1996 by Axis Communications but IP cameras didn't arrive in South Africa till 2008.[86] In order to regulate the number of suppliers in 2001 the Private Security Industry Regulation Act was passed requiring all security companies to be registered with the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA).[87]

Latin AmericaEdit

In Latin America, the CCTV market is growing rapidly with the increase of property crime.[88]

Video surveillance and terrorismEdit

Material collected by surveillance cameras has been used as a tool in post-event forensics to identify tactics, techniques and perpetrators of terrorist attacks. Furthermore, there are various projects − such as INDECT − that aim to detect suspicious behaviours of individuals and crowds.[89] It has been argued that terrorists won't be deterred by cameras, that terror attacks aren't really the subject of the current use of video surveillance and that terrorists might even see it as an extra channel for propaganda and publication of their acts.[90][91] In Germany calls for extended video surveillance by the country's main political parties, SPD, CDU and CSU have been dismissed as "little more than a placebo for a subjective feeling of security".[92]

PrivacyEdit

 
A mobile closed-circuit TV van monitoring a street market

Proponents of CCTV cameras argue that cameras are effective at deterring and solving crime, and that appropriate regulation and legal restrictions on surveillance of public spaces can provide sufficient protections so that an individual's right to privacy can reasonably be weighed against the benefits of surveillance.[93] However, anti-surveillance activists have held that there is a right to privacy in public areas. Furthermore, while it is true that there may be scenarios wherein a person's right to public privacy can be both reasonably and justifiably compromised, some scholars have argued that such situations are so rare as to not sufficiently warrant the frequent compromising of public privacy rights that occurs in regions with widespread CCTV surveillance. For example, in her book Setting the Watch: Privacy and the Ethics of CCTV Surveillance, Beatrice von Silva-Tarouca Larsen argues that CCTV surveillance is ethically permissible only in "certain restrictively defined situations", such as when a specific location has a "comprehensively documented and significant criminal threat".[94]

In the United States, the Constitution does not explicitly include the right to privacy although the Supreme Court has said several of the amendments to the Constitution implicitly grant this right.[95] Access to video surveillance recordings may require a judge's writ, which is readily available.[96] However, there is little legislation and regulation specific to video surveillance.[97][98]

All countries in the European Union are signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights which protects individual rights including the right to privacy. The EU's Data Protection Directive regulates access to personal data including CCTV recordings.[99] This directive is translated into the national law of each country within the European Union.

In the United Kingdom the Data Protection Act 1998 imposes legal restrictions on the uses of CCTV recordings and mandates the registration of CCTV systems with the Data Protection Agency. In 2004, the successor to the Data Protection Agency, the Information Commissioner's Office clarified that this required registration of all CCTV systems with the Commissioner, and prompt deletion of archived recordings. However, subsequent case law (Durant vs. FSA) limited the scope of the protection provided by this law, and not all CCTV systems are currently regulated.[100]

A 2007 report by the UK Information Commissioner's Office, highlighted the need for the public to be made more aware of the growing use of surveillance and the potential impact on civil liberties.[101][102] In the same year, a campaign group claimed the majority of CCTV cameras in the UK are operated illegally or are in breach of privacy guidelines.[103] In response, the Information Commissioner's Office rebutted the claim and added that any reported abuses of the Data Protection Act are swiftly investigated.[103] Even if there are some concerns arising from the use of CCTV such as involving privacy,[104] more commercial establishments are still installing CCTV systems in the UK.

In 2012, the UK government enacted the Protection of Freedoms Act which includes several provisions related to controlling and restricting the collection, storage, retention, and use of information about individuals. Under this Act, the Home Office published a code of practice in 2013 for the use of surveillance cameras by government and local authorities. The aim of the code is to help ensure their use is "characterised as surveillance by consent, and such consent on the part of the community must be informed consent and not assumed by a system operator. Surveillance by consent should be regarded as analogous to policing by consent."[105]

In Canada, the use of video surveillance has grown very rapidly. In Ontario, both the municipal and provincial versions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act outline very specific guidelines that control how images and information can be gathered by this method and or released.[106]

In Sweden, the use of CCTV in public spaces is nationally regulated; requiring permits for any public operator (incl. Swedish Police Authority) to install CCTV in spaces allowing access to the general public. In an opinion poll commissioned by Lund University in August 2017, the general public of Sweden were asked to choose one measure that would ensure their need for privacy when subject to CCTV-operation in public spaces. 43 percent favored regulation in the form of clear routines for managing, storing and distributing image material generated from surveillance cameras, 39% favored regulation in the form of clear signage informing that camera surveillance in public spaces is present, 2 percent favored regulation in the form of having permits restricting the use of surveillance cameras during certain times of day/week, 10 percent favored regulation in the form of having restrictive policies for issuing permits for surveillance cameras in public spaces. 6 percent were unsure or did not know.[107]

Technological developmentsEdit

 
Surveillance camera at London Heathrow Airport with a wiper for clear images during rain

Computer-controlled analytics and identificationEdit

Computer-controlled cameras can identify, track, and categorize objects in their field of view.[108]

Video content analysis is the capability of automatically analyzing video to detect and determine temporal events not based on a single image, but rather object classification.[109]

VCA analytics can also be used to detect unusual patterns in an environment. The system can be set to detect anomalies in a crowd, for instance a person moving in the opposite direction in airports where passengers are supposed to walk only in one direction out of a plane or in a subway where people are not supposed to exit through the entrances.[110]

There is also a significant difference in where the VCA technology is placed, either the data is being processed within the cameras (on the edge) or by a centralized server. Both technologies have their pros and cons.[111]

 
Eye-in-the-sky surveillance dome camera watching from a high steel pole

To many, the development of CCTV in public areas, linked to computer databases of people's pictures and identity, presents a serious breach of civil liberties. Conservative critics fear the possibility that one would no longer have anonymity in public places.[112]

Retention, storage and preservationEdit

There is a cost in the retention of the images produced by CCTV systems. The amount and quality of data stored on storage media is subject to compression ratios, images stored per second, image size and is effected by the retention period of the videos or images.[113] DVRs store images in a variety of proprietary file formats. Recordings may be retained for a preset amount of time and then automatically archived, overwritten or deleted, the period being determined by the organisation that generated them.

IP camerasEdit

 
Easy Connect Wireless IP camera

A growing branch in CCTV is internet protocol cameras (IP cameras). It is estimated that 2014 was the first year that IP cameras outsold analog cameras.[114] IP cameras use the Internet Protocol (IP) used by most Local Area Networks (LANs) to transmit video across data networks in digital form. IP can optionally be transmitted across the public internet, allowing users to view their cameras through any internet connection available through a computer or a phone, this is considered remote access. For professional or public infrastructure security applications, IP video is restricted to within a private network or VPN.[115]

Networking CCTV camerasEdit

The city of Chicago operates a networked video surveillance system which combines CCTV video feeds of government agencies with those of the private sector, installed in city buses, businesses, public schools, subway stations, housing projects etc.[116] Even homeowners are able to contribute footage. It is estimated to incorporate the video feeds of a total of 15,000 cameras.[117]

The system is used by Chicago's Office of Emergency Management in case of an emergency call: it detects the caller's location and instantly displays the real-time video feed of the nearest security camera to the operator, not requiring any user intervention. While the system is far too vast to allow complete real-time monitoring, it stores the video data for later usage in order to provide possible evidence in criminal cases.[118]

 
An integrated systems unit.

Wireless security camerasEdit

Many consumers are turning to wireless security cameras for home surveillance. Wireless cameras do not require a video cable for video/audio transmission, simply a cable for power. Wireless cameras are also easy and inexpensive to install but lack the reliability of hard-wired cameras.[119] Previous generations of wireless security cameras relied on analogue technology; modern wireless cameras use digital technology which delivers crisper audio, sharper video, and a secure and interference-free signal.[120]

Talking CCTVEdit

In Wiltshire, UK, 2003, a pilot scheme for what is now known as "Talking CCTV" was put into action; allowing operators of CCTV cameras to order offenders to stop what they were doing, ranging from ordering subjects to pick up their rubbish and put it in a bin to ordering groups of vandals to disperse. In 2005, Ray Mallon, the mayor and former senior police officer of Middlesbrough implemented "Talking CCTV" in his area.[121]

Other towns have had such cameras installed. In 2007 several of the devices were installed in Bridlington town centre, East Riding of Yorkshire.[122]

CountermeasuresEdit

Due to the widespread implementation of surveillance cameras, glasses are being built which can defeat CCTV cameras. In December 2016 a form of anti-CCTV and facial recognition sunglasses called 'reflectacles' were invented by a custom-spectacle-craftsmen based in Chicago named Scott Urban.[123] They reflect infrared and, optionally, visible light which makes the users face a white blur to cameras. The project easily surpassed its funding goal of $28,000 and reflectacles became commercially available in June 2017.[124]

 
Anti-CCTV graffiti

See alsoEdit

NotesEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Kumar, Vikas; Svensson, Jakob, eds. (2015). Promoting Social Change and Democracy Through Information Technology. IGI Global. p. 75. ISBN 9781466685031.
  2. ^ Dempsey, John S. (2008). Introduction to private security. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. p. 78. ISBN 9780534558734.
  3. ^ Verman, Romesh. Distance Education In Technological Age, Anmol Publications Pvt. Ltd., 2005, pp.166, ISBN 81-261-2210-2, ISBN 978-81-261-2210-3.
  4. ^ "Distance education in Asia and the Pacific: Proceedings Of The Regional Seminar On Distance Education, 26 November - 3 December 1986", Asian Development Bank, Bangkok, Thailand, Volume 2, 1987
  5. ^ a b Hung, Esq.; Babin, MD; PhD.; Coberly, PhD., Vivian; Steven; Jacqueline. "A Market Survey on Body Worn Camera Technologies" (PDF). The Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ "What's wrong with public video surveillance?". ACLU. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  7. ^ "Surveillance Cameras and the Right to Privacy". CBS News. 13 August 2010. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  8. ^ a b "Rise of Surveillance Camera Installed Base Slows". 5 May 2016. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  9. ^ a b Glinsky, Albert. (2000). Theremin : ether music and espionage. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. pp. 46–47. ISBN 0252025822. OCLC 43286443.
  10. ^ Dornberger, Walter: V-2, Ballantine Books 1954, ASIN: B000P6L1ES, page 14.
  11. ^ "Television Rides Wires" , February 1949, Popular Science small article, bottom of page 179
  12. ^ Kruegle, Herman (15 March 2011). CCTV Surveillance. ISBN 9780080468181.
  13. ^ a b Roberts, Lucy. "History of Video Surveillance and CCTV" We C U Surveillance Retrieved 2011-10-20
  14. ^ "Internet based CCTV on cloud services" (in Finnish). fennoturvapalvelut. 27 March 2015.
  15. ^ a b Ezra, Michael (2013). The Economic Civil Rights Movement: African Americans and the Struggle for Economic Power. Routledge. p. 105. ISBN 9781136274756.
  16. ^ a b c "History of Prizefighting's Biggest Money Fights". Bloody Elbow. SB Nation. 24 August 2017.
  17. ^ Television. Frederick A. Kugel Company. 1965. p. 78. Teleprompter's main-spring, Irving B. Kahn (he's chairman of the board and president), had a taste of closed circuit operations as early as 1948. That summer, Kahn, then a vice president of 20th Century-Fox, negotiated what was probably the first inter-city closed circuit telecast in history, a pickup of the Joe Louis-Joe Walcott fight.
  18. ^ "Zaire's fight promotion opens new gold mines". The Morning Herald. 18 November 1974.
  19. ^ "Karriem Allah". Black Belt. Active Interest Media, Inc.: 35 1976.
  20. ^ "Wrestlemania In Photographs: 1-10". Sportskeeda. 1 April 2017.
  21. ^ Chavez-De La Hoya Fight Is A Bout About Contrasts, Chicago Tribune article, 1996-06-07, Retrieved on 2015-02-23
  22. ^ [Robb, Gary C. (1979) "Police Use of CCTV Surveillance: Constitutional Implications and Proposed Regulations" University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. pg. 572]
  23. ^ a b c d e f [Yesil, Bilge. (2006) "Watching Ourselves" Cultural Studies. Vol 20(4-5) pg. 400-416]
  24. ^ "You're being watched, New York!". BBC. 11 March 2002.
  25. ^ Staff (August 2007). "CCTV". Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk. Archived from the original on 23 May 2009. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
  26. ^ a b "Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Journalist's Resource.org. 11 February 2014.
  27. ^ Zehnder (2009). = "The economics of subjective security and camera surveillance" Check |url= value (help). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  28. ^ Priks, Mikael (1 November 2015). "The Effects of Surveillance Cameras on Crime: Evidence from the Stockholm Subway". The Economic Journal. 125 (588): F289–F305. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12327. ISSN 1468-0297.
  29. ^ Stutzer (2013). "Is camera surveillance an effective measure of counterterrorism?". Defence and Peace Economics. 24: 1–14. doi:10.1080/10242694.2011.650481.
  30. ^ Gustav Alexandrie (2017). "Surveillance cameras and crime: a review of randomized and natural experiments". Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 18 (2): 210–222. doi:10.1080/14043858.2017.1387410.
  31. ^ "Orphaned Video System in Philadelphia?". May 2015.
  32. ^ "Police are failing to recover crucial CCTV footage, new figures suggest", The Daily Telegraph
  33. ^ "CCTV to drive down cab attacks", BBC
  34. ^ "Taxi CCTV cameras are installed", BBC
  35. ^ "National community Crime Prevention Programme" (PDF). Retrieved 30 March 2016.
  36. ^ a b "Assessing the impact of CCTV" (PDF). Archived from [http:/rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/rdsolr1205.pdf the original] Check |url= value (help) (PDF) on 18 February 2011. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
  37. ^ "Are CCTV cameras a waste of money in the fight against crime?" Forward Edge, 7 May 2008
  38. ^ Hughe, Mark (25 August 2009). "CCTV in the spotlight: one crime solved for every 1,000 cameras". Independent News and Media Limited.
  39. ^ "http://news.bbc.co.uk/" BBC
  40. ^ "Digital CCTV Scheme Switches On," BBC
  41. ^ Public to Monitor CCTV From Home, BBC
  42. ^ Angels of Silence see crime where others don't Globe & Mail, 20 November 2013
  43. ^ "Network of CCTV cameras proving effective". straitstimes. 8 March 2016. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  44. ^ 'Six crimes a day' solved by CCTV, Met says
  45. ^ Camera in beeld
  46. ^ Bayley, David H.; Stenning, Philip C. (2016). Governing the Police: Experience in Six Democracies. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1412862318.
  47. ^ Motorway Cameras in England, http://www.motorwaycameras.co.uk[unreliable source?]
  48. ^ Networx Security. "Closed Circuit Television." Retrieved 7 March 2019.
  49. ^ Kablenet, The Register. "TfL hands out contracts for congestion charge tags." 6 June 2008. Retrieved 7 March 2019.
  50. ^ Rowena Coetsee, Bay Area News Group. "New surveillance cameras doing their job, Antioch’s top cop says." 11 August 2017. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
  51. ^ Prof. Eugene Volokh, The Wall Street Journal. "Traffic Enforcement Cameras." 26 March 2002. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
  52. ^ FCC Train Dispatch training video, 25 March 2013, retrieved 26 July 2018 (Explains about DOO train dispatch it states about the use of CCTV monitors at certain stations at 7:35 in the video.)
  53. ^ Facial recognition cameras to be installed on Rotterdam trams
  54. ^ Trial by 20Face
  55. ^ "Using CCTV to monitor the workplace". icaew. Retrieved 18 September 2016.
  56. ^ ATL (22 October 2013). "Use of CCTV surveillance in schools". ATL the education union. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  57. ^ Bruce McDougall and Katherine Danks (28 March 2012). "School security CCTV puts bullies on pause". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 8 November 2016.
  58. ^ "Legal aspects of the use of video cameras in schools =".
  59. ^ "Benalla. Trois policiers suspendus pour avoir transmis des images de vidéosurveillance". 20 July 2018.
  60. ^ khris78. "The CCTV Map". osmcamera. Archived from the original on 25 October 2014. Retrieved 2 August 2014.
  61. ^ "Australian state government to expand CCTV use across transport network". Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  62. ^ "Chinese TV station CCTV provide 'old school' analysis of AFC Asian Cup match". Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  63. ^ "Indian state government uses CCTV to cut forest crimes". Archived from the original on 11 October 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  64. ^ "Smart cameras catch man in 60,000 crowd". BBC News. 13 April 2018. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  65. ^ Technocreep : the surrender of privacy and the capitalization of intimacy. [S.l.]: Greystone Books. 2014. p. 28. ISBN 978-1771641227; "Surveillance Society: New High-Tech Cameras Are Watching You". Popular Mechanics. 30 September 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2015; "Lawmakers want more surveillance on the ground -- and in the sky". NBC News. 20 April 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2015; Dempsey, John; Forst, Linda (2015). An Introduction to Policing. Cengage Learning. p. 485. ISBN 9781305544680.
  66. ^ "Public Video Surveillance: Is It An Effective Crime Prevention Tool?". California Research Bureau. June 1997. Retrieved 5 February 2015. The popularity of CCTV security systems has not gone unnoticed by the manufacturers of camera surveillance systems. ...A leading CCTV manufacturer reported net earnings of $120 million in 1995, compared with net earnings of $16 million the previous year. ...Over 50 percent of all CCTV surveillance equipment sales are to industrial and commercial clients. CCTV surveillance is also very common in the American workplace.
  67. ^ Minoli, Daniel (2013). Building the internet of things with IPv6 and MIPv6 the evolving world of M2M communications. New Jersey: Wiley. p. 86. ISBN 9781118647134.
  68. ^ "The great surveillance boom". Fortune. 26 April 2013. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  69. ^ "Privacy Fears Grow as Cities Increase Surveillance". The New York Times. 13 October 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  70. ^ "Chicago's Camera Network Is Everywhere". Wall Street Journal. 17 November 2009. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  71. ^ "Chicago Links Police, Private Cameras". WLS-TV. 2010. Retrieved 16 August 2010.
  72. ^ "Chicago's Video SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS: A PERVASIVE AND UNREGULATED THREAT TO OUR PRIVACY" (PDF). ACLU of Illinois. February 2011. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  73. ^ "NYPD expands surveillance net to fight crime as well as terrorism". Reuters. 21 June 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  74. ^ "Lack of Video Slows Hunt for a Killer in the Subway". The New York Times. 29 March 2010. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  75. ^ "The State Of Surveillance". Bloomberg Business. 7 August 2005. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  76. ^ "The Building Has 1,000 Eyes". The New York Times. 4 October 2013. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  77. ^ "30,000 Surveillance Cameras Monitor D.C.-Area Public Schools". NBC Washington. 1 January 2015. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  78. ^ "Metro Plans to Triple Number of Security Cameras". NBC Washington. 1 April 2013. Retrieved 31 October 2015.
  79. ^ a b "The Price of Privacy: How local authorities spent £515m on CCTV in four years" (PDF). Big Brother Watch. February 2012. p. 30.
  80. ^ a b "You're being watched: there's one CCTV camera for every 32 people in UK - Research shows 1.85m machines across Britain, most of them indoors and privately operated". The Guardian. 2 March 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
  81. ^ "CCTV in London" (PDF). Retrieved 22 July 2009.
  82. ^ "FactCheck: how many CCTV cameras?". Channel 4 News. 18 June 2008. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
  83. ^ "How many cameras are there?". CCTV User Group. 18 June 2008. Archived from the original on 23 October 2008. Retrieved 8 May 2009.
  84. ^ Bannister, J., Mackenzie, S. and Norris, P. Public Space CCTV in Scotland(2009), Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research (Research Report)
  85. ^ a b One Vision, One Mission, One Team Archived 14 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine(2014), Halton Regional Police Service
  86. ^ "CCTV Systems". Retrieved 24 February 2017.
  87. ^ "PSIRA ACT" (PDF). Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority. 25 February 2002. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
  88. ^ "Latin American Physical Security Market Growing Rapidly," 8 October 2009 Security Magazine
  89. ^ Mould, Nick; Regens, James L.; Jensen, Carl J.; Edger, David N. (30 August 2014). "Video surveillance and counterterrorism: the application of suspicious activity recognition in visual surveillance systems to counterterrorism". Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. 9 (2): 151–175. doi:10.1080/18335330.2014.940819.
  90. ^ "In the Petabyte Age of Surveillance, Software Polices". Popular Mechanics. 10 May 2010. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  91. ^ "Mehr Videoüberwachung gegen Terroristen - WDR aktuell - Sendung - Video - Mediathek - WDR". WDR. 26 October 2016. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  92. ^ "Calls increase for sweeping surveillance after Berlin attack". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 4 January 2017.
  93. ^ Kroener, Inga (2014). CCTV: A Technology Under the Radar?. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 9781472400963.
  94. ^ Beatrice Von Silva-Tarouca Larsen (2011). Setting the watch: Privacy and the ethics of CCTV surveillance. Hart Publishing. p. 160. ISBN 9781849460842.
  95. ^ "Your Right to Privacy". American Civil Liberties Union.
  96. ^ Department of Justice - Video Surveillance Retrieved 6 August 1982
  97. ^ "What's Wrong With Public Video Surveillance". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved 24 January 2016.
  98. ^ Inga Kroener (2014). CCTV: A Technology Under the Radar?. Ashgate Publishing. p. 110. ISBN 9781472400963.
  99. ^ Kroener, Inga (2014). CCTV: A Technology Under the Radar?. Ashgate Publishing. p. 107. ISBN 9781472400963.
  100. ^ "Memorandum by A A Adams, BSc, MSc, PhD, LLM, MBCS, CITP School of Systems Engineering". UK Parliament Constitution Committee - Written Evidence. Surveillance: Citizens and the State. January 2007.
  101. ^ "Privacy watchdog wants curbs on surveillance". The Telegraph. 1 May 2007.
  102. ^ "CCTV, computers and the 'climate of fear'". Evening Standard. 30 April 2007.
  103. ^ a b "Majority of UK's CCTV cameras 'are illegal'". The Telegraph. 31 May 2007.
  104. ^ "Home surveillance CCTV images may breach data protection laws, ECJ rules". Retrieved 11 March 2015.
  105. ^ "Surveillance Camera Code of Practice" (PDF). UK Government Home Office. June 2013. p. 5. Retrieved 1 December 2013.
  106. ^ Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Archived 24 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine Text
  107. ^ Lahtinen, Markus (2017). "The perception of surveillance cameras and privacy among the general public in Sweden" (PDF). LUSAX-research group, Lund University School of Economics and Management, Sweden.
  108. ^ James Vincent, The Verge. "Artificial Intelligence Is Going To Supercharge Surveillance." 23 January 2018. Retrieved 25 March 2019
  109. ^ 2018 9th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS) : 3-5 April 2018, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan. Jordan University of Science & Technology, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Jordan Section,, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. [Piscataway, New Jersey. ISBN 9781538643662.CS1 maint: others (link)
  110. ^ "MATE's Analytics Integrate with Hirsch Security Systems".
  111. ^ "Image Processing Techniques for Video Content Extraction" (PDF).
  112. ^ Todd Lewan (7 July 2007). "Microchips in humans spark privacy debate". USAToday. Retrieved 7 June 2012.
  113. ^ "MotionJPEG, JPEG2000, H.264 and MPEG-4 compression methods in CCTV". Retrieved 1 May 2011.
  114. ^ "Global value of IP camera sales now close to 50% of CCTV cameras sold, but..."
  115. ^ "Dispelling the Top 10 Myths of IP Surveillance" (PDF). Retrieved 30 March 2016.
  116. ^ "The City of Chicago's OEMC and IBM Launch Advanced Video Surveillance System". IBM News Room.
  117. ^ William M. Bulkeley. "Chicago's Camera Network Is Everywhere". Wall Street Journal.
  118. ^ "Chicago's Camera Network Is Everywhere", The Wall Street Journal
  119. ^ "2012".
  120. ^ Sadun, Erica (26 December 2006). Digital Video Essentials: Shoot, Transfer, Edit, Share By Erica Sadun. ISBN 9780470113196. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  121. ^ "Town trials talking CCTV cameras". BBC News. 17 September 2006.
  122. ^ "'Talking' CCTV cameras are tested". BBC News. 25 March 2007.
  123. ^ "Be Seen and Unseen! Reflectacles are the Sunglasses of the Future".
  124. ^ "Reflectacles - Reflective Eyewear and Sunglasses". Kickstarter.

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit