April 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Sheep8144402. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to North Hill House School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sheep (talkhe/him) 15:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, North Hill House School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at North Hill House School, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 15:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at North Hill House School, you may be blocked from editing. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

its not neutral though. You are making it look good when in actual fact it is closer to a prison than a school. Does wikipedia support spreading false information that impacts the life of childrens education? If so then shame on you and the company 89.131.214.120 (talk) 18:41, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
You added your own personal analysis to the article and provided sources which did not support the added text. Please review WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:NPOV, and especially WP:BLP, as we have a very strict policy covering how to write about living people. If you have any further inquiries please seek assistance at the WP:TEAHOUSE. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 18:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay but the references that are used on the page anyways are false. Anyone can create a website and add some info to it so it is 'legitimate' 89.131.214.120 (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't call them false, but grossly inadequate would not be inapt. Two are WP:PRIMARY though some WP:ABOUTSELF is allowed. Of the other two, one is a UK Gov inspection report, and the other is a historic building listing. While I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of these references, none are likely to satisfy WP:SIGCOV. The article could be WP:STUBIFYed, and may even be candidate for WP:PROD or WP:AFD, though a WP:BEFORE would first be necessary. It's important to note that many of our articles on educational institutions are legacies from a time when WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES was much less stringent; hope this helps. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply