December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Simon Madden (Irish footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm The Banner. Your recent edit to the page Katherine Zappone appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history at Irish people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 14:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loyola College of Social Sciences. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Revenge editing... edit

... is one of the most handy ways to get yourself blocked. Please stop your disruptive editing or face the consequences. The Banner talk 14:39, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Loyola College of Social Sciences, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 14:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WHat have I done?80.111.179.32 (talk) 14:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Breached the three-revert rule, for a start. Wikistalking, for another... BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:45, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Can you provide some sort of evidence for those accusations?80.111.179.32 (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hijacking of an article: Ruth Patterson edit

Never replace an article with an article about a different subject. If you do that again you are likely to be blocked again. Doug Weller talk 15:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Why is that problematic? Can you explain how? I dont know how to create articles so I just did that.80.111.179.32 (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Yakov Dzhugashvili, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:52, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.