79.199.170.144

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriele Scheler (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriele Scheler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

There are many reliable sources here: peer-reviewed articles, patent applications, articles that were referenced on wikipedia pages (this is how I found out), there is a link to a podcast, and there is a non-profit with a board of many scientists which has been offering scholarships since 2016. She is president of the non-profit. Clearly information about such a person is relevant to wikipedia. Once the page is there, others will probably contribute. 79.199.170.144 (talk) 06:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 79.199.170.144! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriele Scheler (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriele Scheler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

As stated above, the scientist in question is also head of a non-profit research organization see above, and she has been interviewed in a podcast. The non-profit has been offering scholarships since 2016 and clearly the founder is notable and of interest. She has been working at Stanford, the Salk institute and Berkeley, and there will be more information once the page is out. By blocking the page from appearing you just make it more difficult for people to find information about her. She is very active on social media (check it out). People do want to know about Gabriele Scheler, maybe you should start looking at how often this page gets accessed once it is out. 79.199.170.144 (talk) 06:15, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Out of the 8 criteria, this scientist would fulfill criterion 8, except that she is not editor of a journal but head of a research organization. This is not listed but it is clearly equivalent. 79.199.170.144 (talk) 06:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Being part of a notable organization does not automatically make one notable. (see WP:INHERIT) Being active on social media and working at universities also does not contribute towards notablilty, unless there are multiple independent reliable sources that discuss her with significant coverage, which there aren't. Also see WP:TOOSOON. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 06:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

She founded and is president of the organization. You admit that it is a notable organization, so the president should have an entry. There is already one independent reliable source which discuss her work with significant coverage. It is not just any university, these are top worldwide universities, and she ran an organization at one of them. It is ok to wait until the next independent reliable source appears. I was told that it takes 4 months to review an entry. Instead it was a few hours. I complained to the editor that there may be a competitor behind the anonymous person in order to limit the outreach of the non-profit by denying the founder sufficient background information. Also, the rejector seems to think that the fabric of persons she is linked with does not matter. This is not just any academic. Please read the text carefully. 79.199.170.144 (talk) 19:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriele Scheler (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriele Scheler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriele Scheler (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gabriele Scheler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

---