Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (77.87.224.97) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Schwarzelühr-Sutter (September 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 77.87.224.97, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yann (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parliamentary State Secretaries (September 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 18:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Schwarzelühr-Sutter (October 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:38, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I see your submission was rejected. Would it be OK with you if I edit the article and add some sources and more information relevant to notability? I thought it would be best to ask first, in case you are also in the process of improving the article offline. As I understand it, the subject of the article is a member of the German federal parliament and a member of Merkel's cabinet, so establishing notability as a politician should not really be a problem, even if there may not be any English-language sources. --Boson (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter (February 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

New draft edit

I see you have created a new draft at Draft:Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter, as well as the old one at Draft:Rita Schwarzelühr-Sutter. Since the old name is correct, I would suggest concentrating on that draft and abandoning the new one (Draft:Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter). I have proposed doing this by merging the two (see the tags at the top of the two drafts and the link to the merge discussion at Talk draft:Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter). I have now (roughly) translated the German article (de: Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter) and added references to reliable independent sources, including national and regional newspapers.

Take a look at the new version of Draft:Rita Schwarzelühr-Sutter and feel free to resubmit after checking the references. Let me know if you need any assistance; I am a bit busy but will get back to you as soon as possible.

Just a few tips:

  • Although English sources are obviously preferred for an English language encyclopedia, there is no problem with using German sources.
  • Notability is not the same as importance. Notability within the meaning of Wikipedia policies and guidelines is generally related to the coverage of the subject by independent sources, as described in the general notability guidelines. Sources conected to the subject can be used for some purposes, but do not normally help to establish notability. So sources like reputable regional and national newspapers and news magazines are usually good sources for contemporary politicians.

I have added the information that Rita Schwarzelühr-Sutter is in Merkel's cabinet to the introduction. This helps establish importance and notability as a politician.

Creating an account would help communication. For instance, you could then be "pinged" on talk pages, and you can set your notification preferences. --Boson (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Parliamentary State Secretaries concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Parliamentary State Secretaries, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 31 March edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Parliamentary State Secretaries edit

 

Hello, 77.87.224.97. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Parliamentary State Secretaries".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 talk 06:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter (June 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 21:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter has been accepted edit

 
Rita Schwarzelühr Sutter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply