April 2018

edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Allegiant (novel). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Divergent Series: Allegiant has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Home Alone 2: Lost in New York, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history at Pocahontas (nickname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Louisa Adams, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:35, 11 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to A Thousand Words (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Home Lander (talk) 16:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Donald Trump filmography, you may be blocked from editing. Plandu (talk) 16:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply