74.49.174.204

January 2023

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jewish views on Muhammad, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 21:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2023

Hello, I'm LR0725. I noticed that in this edit to Province of Massachusetts Bay, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 02:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Medicine. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 02:31, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Pfizer appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 18:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did to AstraZeneca. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 20:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did at User talk:2A02:3032:305:3053:3536:7B87:60B9:9911, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 20:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---