Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Someone using this IP address, 71.233.160.111, has been reverting editson {{{Article}}}. It is important to note that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring prohibits more than three reverts in a 24-hour period. You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 73.69.184.160 (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Alex Morse. Thank you.

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Kleinpecan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Michael Foot, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kleinpecan (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Aeschylus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shelley Haley—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschylus (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Shelley Haley. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 21:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shelley Haley. ... discospinster talk 21:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

discospinster, it isn't unsourced or poorly sourced, the entire wikipedia entry has multiple examples of her racism. Please stop removing factual, sourced information from wikipedia entries.

There are no examples of racism in the article, please do not add your own interpretation. ... discospinster talk 21:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Tiffany Cross. Pahunkat (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tiffany Cross, you may be blocked from editing. David Brooks (talk) 02:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

DavidBrooksI don't understand what you mean. There are many articles on wikipedia that document racists and conspiracy theorists. Why is it disruptive to label this racist conspiracy theorist appropriately?

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tiffany Cross, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CodeTalker (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

CodeTalker What sources do you need? Her show is a constant stream of racism and violent conspiracy theories. It's well documented.

You did not provide a single source to support the changes you made. Any change, especially to a biography of a living person needs a reference to a reliable source. To make a change like this, you must include one or more references in the article along with your change. If, as you say, this is "well documented", then you should be able to easily find them. But I am fairly confident you will not find a reliable source that says that her occupation is "Racemonger, Race Agitator, Conspiracy Theorist and Statist Bootlicker". CodeTalker (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

CodeTalker And by "reliable source" you mean only leftwing sources, right? Because if it's only covered by Fox News or Daily Wire, it must not be true. Bias by omission. Look at her biography edit history, she called Rittenhouse a "murderous white supremacist" after his jury trial and it was sourced but it was still removed.

Anyway, if you want I'll link to dozens of her racist conspiracy theory comments with links to them, and you guys will remove them all anyway. You don't care about sources.

That would be wp:synthesis. You need to wp:cite a wp:reliable source that makes that statement. Adakiko (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Brianna Keilar. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 00:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Adakiko Is Brianna a conservative?

Tommy Dorfman

edit

Please stop changing the pronouns on that article to he/him. The gender change to female is supported with citations in the article. RteeeeKed💬📖 22:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tommy is a man, not a woman. Wikipedia is no place for far left conspiracy theories and anti-science misinformation. 71.233.160.111 (talk) 23:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The consensus of the Wikipedia community is to respect the self-reported gender of individuals, when appropriately sourced. Wikipedia is the place for that which the Wikipedia community chooses by consensus. You are free to not read or edit Wikipedia, and you are free (and warmly invited) to raise topics in Talk pages in an effort to build new consensus, but you are not free to edit Wikipedia in contravention of consensus. --DavidK93 (talk) 23:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You might be shocked to know that consensus is that Tommy is a man. Regardless of whatever far left conspiracy theories you pass around in your weird gender cult. 71.233.160.111 (talk) 03:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Monstrosity (film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply