September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maiden and married names, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Elizabeth Cady Stanton into Maiden and married names. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by occupation/Suffragists, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 16:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thigh Line Lyre Triangular have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Megan Rapinoe— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 15:14, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Megan Rapinoe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 15:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Valerie Solanas into Up Your Ass (play). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gertrude Stein, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 17:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Timeline of American women in war and the U.S. military from 1945 to 1999. andritolion (talk) 16:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)Reply