71.195.10.41

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to One Year War. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MythSearcher^talk 01:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to F-35 Lightning II, you will be blocked from editing. Edward321 (talk) 21:48, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Josh Duhamel, you will be blocked from editing. Edward321 (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at F-35 Lightning II, you will be blocked from editing.   -Fnlayson (talk) 17:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Your recent edit to the page Universal Century appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to The Super Dimension Fortress Macross. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward321 (talk) 22:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Metal Armor Dragonar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward321 (talk) 22:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Universal Century. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edward321 (talk) 23:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris (talk) 02:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to G-Saviour ‎, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Farix (Talk) 23:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to G-Saviour. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Farix (Talk) 00:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to G-Saviour. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Farix (Talk) 00:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on G-Saviour. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Farix (Talk) 00:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. RaseaC (talk) 02:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

The duration of the block is 2 * 7 * 24 hours. Here are the reverts in question.

Hello old fruit. Your talk page is a mass of warnings and your block log is impressive for one so new. But you must have noticed that your strategy of revert-but-don't-talk and ignore-WP:3RR simply doesn't work. So, you need a new strategy. If that is going to be leave-wikipedia, so be it. Otherwise, I suggest you read the rules, abide by them, and begin to discuss William M. Connolley (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Chouriki Sentai Ohranger. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Merlion  444  13:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The recent edit you made to Choujin Sentai Jetman constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 18:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Chouriki Sentai Ohranger. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 21:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kyuukyuu Sentai GoGoFive has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~SpK 22:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Samurai Sentai Shinkenger, you will be blocked from editing. at-210 ^{discovered elements ∞ what am I?} 22:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 23:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page United Nations Space Command (Halo) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 22:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page United Nations Space Command (Halo). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 22:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Don Haskins worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Immortal Grand Prix characters. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Edward321 (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sena Kobayakawa has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 21:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Seijuro Shin. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 21:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Religion in The Simpsons has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 00:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Seijuro Shin. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 01:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sena Kobayakawa. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 01:30, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Seijuro Shin. Boomshadow ^talk _contribs 17:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sena Kobayakawa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Sena Kobayakawa. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Edward321 (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Dune-related articles

You have made several inaccurate and/or badly formatted edits to various Dune-related articles; please do not add unsourced information, remove content, or make other disruptive edits. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 02:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Dune planets. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TAnthony^Talk 02:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Old Empire (Dune). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TAnthony^Talk 02:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Lasgun, you will be blocked from editing. — TAnthony^Talk 02:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Old Empire (Dune), you will be blocked from editing. — TAnthony^Talk 02:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dune'

The League of Nobles is a term invented for the recent prequels, and should not be mixed in which discussion of Frank Herbert's original works unless it is specifically noted as such. The area of List of Dune planets you persist in changing is specifically referenced to Herbert's works. Further, the Landsraad article explains, with sources, how that governing body was at some point called the "Landsraad League" (accoding to Frank Herbert) and even notes later in the article the term "Leangue of Nobles" as related to the prequels not written by Frank Herbert.

Further, you changing in this and other articles "13,300 worlds under Landsraad influence immediately after the Butlerian Jihad" to "13,300 worlds under Landsraad influence immediately before the Butlerian Jihad" is problematic. While you might argue that these would be interchangeable because this number would presumably be the same immediately before or immediately after, the source is specifically citing numbers based on deaths from a post-Jihad perspective.

Adding the information in the way you have been is inaccurate and misleading. Please stop.— TAnthony^Talk 21:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 21:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June, 2010

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to G-Saviour, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher^talk 08:29, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 6 months from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Extraterrestrial life, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Samurai X: Reflection, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 18:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Immortal Grand Prix characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ProtoFire (talk) 00:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Emperor Gaozu of Han with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Free_Bear (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:One Year War are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 22:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at One Year War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your referencing are all non-existent and continued to disrupt Wikipedia with the same self-claimed info without ANY actual official sources. If you are going to reference a video on youtube about an official show, at least give a link or an episode number, so others can verify it, but since you NEVER do that and was rebuked by multiple official sources, we all know you are just lying. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher^talk 01:22, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dirge (novel) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.   — Jeff G.  ツ 03:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Iritscen (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

August 2012

Hello, I'm Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to G.I. Joe (IDW Publishing), because it didn't appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WaggersTALK 07:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to World War III (G.I. Joe), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

---