Welcome to my talk page! Please be aware that if you leave a message for me HERE, I will reply HERE. If I leave a message on YOUR page, I will look for a reply THERE. Thanks!


QuestionEdit

Hi. I'm a wikipedia newbie and confused why you've removed a reference in the Zandar GI Joe character article. There's a lot of information in that source, and that particular character trait should have a cited reference. Joefan777 (talk) 23:06, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Joefan777, that reference is cited at the end of the very next sentence. I figured it could cover both sentences, instead of having to be cited twice. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Grand Jury (1936 film)Edit

Hi and Happy New Year. It's been a long time since we interacted. Thanks for checking the B level criteria on the article. I always prefer other editors to evaluate, so I do appreciate it. If you wouldn't mind however, could you tell me what it is missing from B5? I really thought I had that covered with the lobby card in the infobox, and the two pics I managed to find in old magazines? Also, on the B2, what additional type of information would you be looking for. Not that I can find it with my available resources, I pretty much included everything I could, but for future reference, where do you see it lacking. Thanks for your input, and again, thanks for the review. Onel5969 TT me 17:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

QuestionEdit

In this edit you removed the {{WikiProject Romance}} template. Was that your intention? And if so, why did your edit summary say only "Updated classification using AWB"? Debresser (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I meant to just remove the United States template, since I was cleaning up unassessed American film articles. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Sure. Thank you for fixing it so promptly. Debresser (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

UpdateEdit

Could you please rate this[1] unassessed article. 117.246.84.62 (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

AWBEdit

Hi. Please read the rules of use for AWB, esp. #4 - "Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits. An edit that has no noticeable effect on the rendered page is generally considered an insignificant edit". For example, this edit was pointless. Thanks. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 18:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I understand why you feel that edit is insignificant, but it was not pointless. I was using AWB to catch some silent film stubs that were not tagged as part of the Silent films wikiproject. I discovered that there are still some articles that were initially tagged by a bot, with a space in front of the parameter. This makes it difficult for AWB to recognize those articles, so I see no reason not to clean them up when I come across them. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
This is quite easy for AWB actually. Use regex. \s* is the code to detect all white space (however much is there). Also please mark simple category changes minor. You've inadvertently spammed my watch list something awful. ~ Rob13Talk 01:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Dungeons & Dragons character stubs has been nominated for discussionEdit

 

Category:Dungeons & Dragons character stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Batman revertEdit

Hi, could you explain this revert? Your edit summary included no rationale. Thanks. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

You’ve really never heard anyone refer to Batman Begins as simply Batman, being the first in a new line of movies? Because I could have sworn I had, which would mean it belongs on the dab page. Are you sure? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 03:53, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes I'm sure it doesn't belong there, for the reasons I stated in my edit summary. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be forgetting that we don’t just go by the official title, but any name commonly used to refer to the subject. WP:PTM and MOS:DAB both support this. So I ask again: are you sure this movie is never referred to as just “Batman”? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 23:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Din of Celestial BirdsEdit

An article that you have been involved in editing—Din of Celestial Birds—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Paleface Jack (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackgate Penitentiary.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Blackgate Penitentiary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DrRC (talk) 20:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blackgate Penitentiary.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Blackgate Penitentiary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:D&D-char-stubEdit

 Template:D&D-char-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The rating for OthelloEdit

Hi Fortdj33. If you have a look at the grading scheme, you'll find it says, in part, "the article should … provide enough sources to establish verifiability." The most generous interpretation possible of that is that the article should contain at least one source in order to qualify for Start class. Personally I use two rules of thumb to distinguish between Stub and Start class: headings and references. If the article is organised into sections using headings and cites at least one source it's Start-class, otherwise it's Stub-class. I've found that helpful over the years, particularly when it comes to borderline cases like Othello. Anyways, I would encourage you to consider the rating one more time. Cheers, --Xover (talk) 04:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

List of Punisher titlesEdit

Why have you been reverting my work when I've been trying to sort out the list? The version you revert back to has several flaws that I'm trying to correct, many of the volumes listing are not correct and end up being confusing with the old version.★Trekker (talk) 15:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The version you're reverting back to is completely bonkers, nothing makes sense. It doesn't even list the limited series in the correct place like most character title listing do.★Trekker (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Just a QuestionEdit

Hello, I noticed that you added a "stub" tag in some articles I have created. So I became very curious about how this classification is made. There some program or you do it by yourself? Just out of curiosity. Cheers!--SirEdimon (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Well, a good rule of thumb for classifying an article as a stub is WP:STUB, but it is completely arbitrary. Usually it depends on the amount of prose in the article, and the size of the article in relation to any WikiProjects. Adding an appropriate stub tag highlights the article's status, and places it in the proper categories for expansion. Fortdj33 (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
When I create an article I don't put any tag, because I really don't know how it's work. But sometimes I see some similar articles, but one is tagged as "start" and the other "stub". So, I was really confuse. I saw that you tagged many articles and I thought: "Why not to ask?"--SirEdimon (talk) 04:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Concerning your recent move of "The Legend of Billy the Kid (TV film)" to "The Legend of Billy the Kid"Edit

Hi, Fortdj33. I saw in my watchlist that you recently moved The Legend of Billy the Kid (TV film) to The Legend of Billy the Kid. This caught my attention because there is now only the article "The" distinguishing that title from the title of the article, Legend of Billy the Kid, that I created on 30 August 2016.

It seems to me that this move causes confusion between the two articles, and that the previous disambiguation was necessary to prevent such confusion. What do you think? Carlstak (talk) 14:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

I understand why you would want to prevent confusion, but per the naming conventions at WP:NCF and WP:NCTV, disambiguation is only necessary if there is another article on Wikipedia with the exact same title. If the article Legend of Billy the Kid required "The", it would be appropriate to add "(film)" to the other article, but otherwise The Legend of Billy the Kid is sufficient. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Hmm. Personally, I don't think it is sufficient. Are you so committed to your changes that you wouldn't consider reverting them? Carlstak (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Bee GeesEdit

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.bathroomreader.com/2014/06/bee-gees-meet-eric-clapton-bunbury-tails/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some of the content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Boy 7Edit

I think you misunderstood Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films). In this case, the qualifiers "Dutch film" and "German film" were enough to distinguish the two film. Adding the year as therefore not necessary any more. The guideline which say to add the year for all non-primary articles, meant only if the year is necessary to disambiguate. Debresser (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. WP:PRIMARYFILM states: "In the rare case that multiple films of the same name are produced in the same year, include additional information such as the country of origin". In other words, the year should be used to disambiguate first, and the country of origin should be added if further disambiguation is needed. Fortdj33 (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Correct, but since in this case the year does not help to disambiguate, it should not be added. That is a rather rare case, because usually it is the year hat helps to disambiguate, which is why this cased isn't specifically addressed by the guideline, but I feel confident that it can and should be inferred from the guideline along these lines. Would you care to present the issue and our diverging opinions at WP:FILM and ask for their opinion? Debresser (talk) 16:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Tagging templates under CSD T2Edit

Please do not tag templates like Template:Italian-short-film-stub, Template:UK-horror-film-stub and Template:UK-short-film-stub as {{db-policy}} unless the WP:CSD#T2 criterion (summarised as "Misrepresentation of policy") really does apply. Stub templates (which are all built around {{asbox}}) are largely informational, they do not not state any policy, so cannot be misrepresenting policy. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Assessment of the Microman page.Edit

Way back in 2011 you graded and assessed the page for the Microman toy line. The page has come a long way since it’s disjointed state in 2011 and I have made some review requests to the folks to maintain Wikipedia toy pages as well as those who maintain Transformers pages but also just wanted to post a friendly “heads up” about these requests since you were the first person to formally look these pages over in any significant way. --SpyMagician (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

an help for Sabrina FerilliEdit

Good morning from Calabria, I'm writing to say hello and know how you are. Well, I'm writing to ask you some help regarding Sabrina Ferilli's page in English, would you give her a refreshed and improved? right and not more than 10 minutes of your precious time. If so, if I can then return the courtesy you will be grateful for it infinitely. Thanks and greetings from Coreca--Luigi Salvatore Vadacchino (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Edits on Scarlett (G.I. Joe)Edit

Read this and this. Also, most of the refs on the page are user-generated sources. 86.173.238.53 (talk) 16:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

"Removed from wikiproject per WP:FILM"Edit

Hi, Fortdj33. Regarding this, what is that about? Did I miss some WP:FILM discussion? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:54, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

No, it's been established for years that the Film project does not cover biography articles. Therefore, instead of adding the {{WikiProject Film}} banner to articles about actors, directors and filmmakers, those articles are covered by adding |filmbio-work-group=yes to {{WikiProject Biography}} instead. This applies to all of the film task forces as well, which means that the American cinema task force does not include articles about American actors, directors and filmmakers, and consequently should not have the |USfilm=yes parameter on the {{WikiProject United States}} banner. Fortdj33 (talk) 21:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
I came here to ask the same question, did some research and discover you were correct Fortdj33. I think, though, rather than removing wholesale any Project header-connection of these various articles to being a filmmaker/actor, wouldn't it be better to replace that parameter with "|filmbio-work-group= |filmbio-priority="? Seems like many filmbio articles have probably been mistakenly placed within WP:FILM - perhaps this could be something for a bot to handle on an ongoing basis - removing the errant template and replacing it with the correct one. In any case, possibly if you mention "filmbio" and link to Template:WikiProject Biography#Work groups in your edit summaries (instead of WP:FILM) that would forestall some of the ongoing hubbub/blowback you probably get here on your talkpage about these Project deletions. Shearonink (talk) 13:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
If you didn't want to link to the Template then I would recommend linking to Wikipedia:WikiProject Film#Scope as that explains the reasons. When you link to WP:FILM alone...well, that's a pretty huge page with lots of tabbed-subpages...an editor might not be sure where to look. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the suggestion, I will adjust my edit summaries to be less confusing. Which one do you think would be more accurate: "Covered by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers", or "Not in the scope of the American cinema task force"? Or maybe both? Fortdj33 (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Part of the problem for many editors is that the deletion will seem arbitrary and possibly might seem like vandalism, so to my mind, the edit summaries have to sufficiently explain the why. I think the best edit summary would include the #Scope linkage because that explains the why the best, why film bios do not belong within the Film WikiProject. If you link to WP:Actors or say "not in the scope of 'American cinema...' " it doesn't state, quite as clearly, why film bios don't actually belong under the WikiProject Film.
This is what #Scope says:
However, for present organizational reasons (as of October 2007), the project does not include articles about actors, directors and filmmakers; those are in the scope of the Biography WikiProject, most especially the Actors and Filmmakers and Screenwriters projects thereof.
You could maybe construct an anchored/linked section (with the above wording or something similar) and then place that section somewhere appropriate onto the [[WP:Actors]] page. Shearonink (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I added a version of the disclaimer above, to the scope of the affected projects and task forces. Hopefully that will allow the modified edit summary "Removed per American cinema task force" to suffice. Fortdj33 (talk) 03:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!Edit

  Thanks for the thanks. I have been in the past working on individual bikinis. The fur bikini is one of them. May be we can collaborate.   Bikini in popular culture has a list of iconic film bikinis. Aditya(talkcontribs) 03:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Cobra (G.I. Joe)Edit

Mind telling me what's disruptive about my edits?.86.131.240.16 (talk) 23:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Well, you seem to be making the same POV edits on this article, that were being made on Scarlett (G.I. Joe), which led to that article being protected. And per WP:BRD, you should try to come to a consensus on the talk page, once your bold edits are reverted. Instead you are edit warring, which is disruptive and not helpful to improving the article. Fortdj33 (talk) 23:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Mind telling me what was actually wrong with what I did?.86.131.240.16 (talk) 23:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

B. UnnikrishnanEdit

Hi, could you re-assess the BLP article B. Unnikrishnan. It currently holds stub-class, but have developed since then.--Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 14:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Plot summary on An Eye for an EyeEdit

Hey, Fortdj33, I added the plot summary on the 1981 Chuck Norris movie An Eye for an Eye. Might need clean up and such. See what you think? BattleshipMan (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

I've never seen the movie, but did my best to clean up the Plot section. Fortdj33 (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World ContestEdit

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

New Page ReviewingEdit

Hello, Fortdj33.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer grantedEdit

Hello Fortdj33. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Fortdj33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nutcracker ChristmasEdit

I've been having computer problems and I'm heading on vacation so when I come back into town I will finish the article. Quidam65 (talk) 22:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Black and burst assessmentEdit

You recently added a stub tag to Black and burst. The article is assessed Start on its talk page. I can go either way with this but we should adjust the assessment to match if we're going the leave the stub tag. ~Kvng (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

NimantranEdit

Hi, Fortdj33!. Thanks for updating the classification on Talk:Palanka (film). Could you please spare a few moments to assess this? Thanks a lot! Amuk (talk) 19:51, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

  • Oops, sorry for the accidental save. The request stands. Amuk (talk) 19:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
    • Wow, that was really prompt. Thanks again! Amuk (talk) 20:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!Edit

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' GreetingsEdit

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)





Articles for Creation ReviewingEdit

Hello, Fortdj33.
AfC submissions
Random submission
~7 weeks
2,592 pending submissions
Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

India film articlesEdit

Hi, Fortdj33. A very happy New Year to you!
Continuing on the theme of my last message, here's another article on an Indian film that is ready for review/reassessment: Massey Sahib. Please take a look. Thanks! Amuk (talk) 06:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Hi. Could you take a look at this article: Strir Patra? I have added several references, but in my opinion the Synopsis doesn't need a citation. Amuk (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
    • Prompt as ever! Thanks a lot. I notice you've left the refimprove tag in place, though. I feel there are enough references for a start class article, and the sources are pretty reliable. So I'm at a bit of a loss. Amuk (talk) 17:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
      • I'm still not sure how to carry out the refimprove. Meanwhile, here's a new article on an Indian film: Ekhoni. Please take a look. Cheers. Amuk (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Here's another new article on an Indian film: Atithi (1965 film). Please take a look. Thanks! Amuk (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Here's another new article on an Indian film:Ghashiram Kotwal. Please take a look. Thanks! Amuk (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Fortdj33. Best wishes for 2019. Here's another new article on an Indian film: Chhuti. Please take a look. Thanks! Amuk (talk) 05:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Reverting editsEdit

Before you continue reverting dozens of edits, can we perhaps first have a chat? Marcocapelle (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

I have no intention to revert dozens of edits, but now that the more specific Category:G.I. Joe soldiers has been created, it should only apply to soldiers on the G.I. Joe team. Other G.I. Joe characters may have served in the military, but they should still be kept in a separate category. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
I see, I thought you were going to revert the whole lot. Then I won't bother you any further. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
No problem, I can understand your concern, but I know that the category was created by consensus. As long as you are OK with the 5 articles that I reverted, I think we're good. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Non-free mediaEdit

I recommend you review Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria which states that we are to include "Minimal number of items. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." This is not my opinion but a local legal policy. Why you think Snake Eyes (G.I. Joe) needs five pieces of non-free media (including several from comic books) to identify one character is beyond me. Can you please explain how five is the minimal amount of pieces of non-free media for this article? ―Justin (koavf)TCM 23:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

I understand the policy, but it does not place a limit on how many images can be used to identify a character. Of the 5 images on the article Snake Eyes (G.I. Joe), only 2 of them are from comic books, and the one that you keep trying to remove, is directly referenced in the prose of the article! The other images are being used to identify the character in toys, movies, etc. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
So are issue #1 and #45 and #27... This particular piece of non-free media adds no value on this page. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 05:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Again, it is your opinion that the image adds no value. You asked for an explanation and I gave you one. Just because you disagree, doesn't mean that you can tailor the article to suit your POV. Fortdj33 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Bold Emett, Ireland's MartyrEdit

Why did you redirect "Bold Emmet, Ireland's Martyr" to "All for Old Ireland"? It's not the same films. Both have a different copyright.

Bold Emmet : © 1915. 3 000 ft. Credits : screenplay and production Sidney Olcott. © Lubin Mfg. Co. (Sidney Olcott, author) 3 Aug 15 ; LP6006.

All for Old : © 1915. 3 reels. Credits : written and produced by Sidney Olcott. © Lubin Mfg. Co. (Sidney Olcott, author) ; 6 Jul 15 ; LP 5 772.

More informations : http://www.sidneyolcott.com/Bold_Emmett.htm (it's in French).

Sincerely Derrien56

G.I. Joe pagesEdit

It looks like you need to step in and do something about the G.I. Joe pages being vandalized[2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.12.132 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Re. Move from Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar (film) to Ramabai Bhimrao AmbedkarEdit

Hello, I am in the process of translating the bio page the Marathi version of the subject bio to Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar (using WP:CXT for starters). I am not entirely sure how to deal with the presence of an existing page which has been moved there from what now seems to the right article name (with the "(film)" suffix). Looking through your profile, I felt there are more chances of you having dealt with something like this - I certainly haven't. Could I ask your help in reverting back Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar to Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar (film), and deleting/blanking Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar so I could replace that with a bio? Alternatively, please feel free to point me to somewhere that helps me figure out how do this myself. :) Thanks in advance -MayureshK 09:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

In the meanwhile, I have created the bio-article stub under Ramabai Ambedkar. In my opinion, the main bio article needs to be under Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar with Ramabai Ambedkar as an additional redirect to the same. The marathi film article needs to go back from Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar to Ramabai Bhimrao Ambedkar (film). Hope that makes sense? -MayureshK 11:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
I was able to sort this on my own. Please feel free to archive this conversation. -MayureshK 14:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Të paftuarit plot's templateEdit

Hello, I hope you can consider few things on this movie. The plot is long since the script is strictly based on a more than 200 pages novel (there's no original script for the movie besides the novel's "condensed" narrative). The movie includes virtually all of the book's narrative chapter by chapter and it actually is rather fragmented, giving the impression that the director has aimed to include everything. The plot tells of elements and characters that's rather hard to omit. I would appreciate if you could revise the plot or maybe remove any redundant phrase or description you can judge it helps this matter. Empathictrust (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Recommendations for your WikiProject G.I. Joe will be delivered soonEdit

Hi Fortdj33,

Thank you for your interest in using our tool. Sorry about the wait. We've been working on improving our tool in the past several weeks, and we will send recommendations to you very soon. Stay tuned. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 23:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Recommending new editors to your WP G.I. JoeEdit

Hi Fortdj33,

Our system generated a list of potential new editors for your project. They may be interested in collaborating with your project members on your project's articles. As you will notice, the list contains both experienced editors and newcomers. Both are valuable for Wikipedia and your project. Please go ahead and introduce your project to them, and point them to some project tasks to start with. We also provide a template invitation message to make it easier to contact the potential new editors. Just click the invite link to write the invitation message.

We'd appreciate it if you could fill the survey to let us know what you think about our recommendations so we can improve our system.

Username Why we recommend this editor First Edit Date Total Edits in ENWP Editor Status Invite Survey
Parkin peet (talk · contribs) Parkin peet's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2018-1-18 82 Newcomer invite survey
The Lool (talk · contribs) The Lool's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2017-11-3 43 Newcomer invite survey
Looplena1997 (talk · contribs) Looplena1997 made 1 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. 2017-12-13 129 Experienced Editor invite survey
Foodles42 (talk · contribs) Foodles42 made 2 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. 2017-4-28 217 Experienced Editor invite survey
StephRJ (talk · contribs) StephRJ's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2012-2-10 178 Experienced Editor invite survey
Kyojikasshu (talk · contribs) Kyojikasshu's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2006-2-25 138 Experienced Editor invite survey

Please let me know below if you have any general feedback about our recommendations. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi Fortdj33, I update the recommendation list sent to you earlier. I fixed some bugs in the previous version (as you might have seen that some editors on the previous list were not quite active). Very sorry about it, but now, everything should be good! Please take a look, and let me know what you think! Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Scarlett (G.I. Joe)Edit

What was wrong with this edit ?. 2A00:23C5:2E16:5701:68ED:47C1:DCC1:BA3A (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

It was very similar to this edit and this edit, both of which resulted in the article being protected. If you feel your edit was reverted in error, please take the discussion to the talk page of the article, instead of edit warring. Fortdj33 (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
What exactly did I do wrong ?. 2A00:23C5:2E16:5701:68ED:47C1:DCC1:BA3A (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
What was wrong with me tagging the page with unreliable source tags?. 2A00:23C5:2E16:5701:84C3:15CC:2D36:723 (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Help to create new articleEdit

I created a article Swastika Dutta help me to improve it. And published this article in keep. Rakhi (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Recommending new editors to WikiProject G.I. JoeEdit

Hi Fortdj33,

Here is a new list of recommendations for WikiProject G.I. Joe. Please take a look when you get a chance. Thank you!

Username Why we recommend this editor First Edit Date Total Edits in ENWP Editor Status Invite Survey
Parkin peet (talk · contribs) Parkin peet's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2018-1-18 82 Newcomer invite survey
The Lool (talk · contribs) The Lool's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category People and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2017-11-3 43 Newcomer invite survey
Jaimeastorga2000 (talk · contribs) Jaimeastorga2000's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! 2006-11-25 422 Experienced Editor invite survey

Bobo.03 (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Scooby DooEdit

People keep adding unrelated nonsense to the Scooby Doo film series page. The live-action part is needed to prevent people from adding shit about the DVD films and other animated projects.★Trekker (talk) 18:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Make a counter argument maybe or at least acknowledge my point please?★Trekker (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
So?★Trekker (talk) 12:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Sorry that I have been away from Wikipedia for a while, but I don't appreciate you pushing me for an argument on my talk page. As I briefly mentioned in my edit summary, per the naming conventions for film articles and disambiguation in general, the title should be as precise as possible. Since there is no article about any other Scooby-Doo film series, the "live action" disambiguation is unnecessary. But I do understand what you are trying to prevent, so I added a hatnote to the article for that effect. Hope that helps. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Sorry but I've seen you edit a bunch of times and I only ever added a comment here after I'd seen you edit the Scooby Doo article. And as far as I'm concerned I don't appreciate being ignored without as much as a single acknowledgment, could at least say something like "really busy right now, will be back when I feel like it". Otherwise I just feel like someone is trying to ignore me until I go away, which has happened on this site before.★Trekker (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!Edit

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!Edit

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Fortdj33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Can you offer your opinion in this discussion?Edit

Hi. In the past you've offered your opinion in choosing photos for the Infobox. Can you offer your neutral opinion in this discussion on a related topic? It may go toward a precedent regarding captions. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Viral (upcoming Bollywood film) listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Viral (upcoming Bollywood film). Since you had some involvement with the Viral (upcoming Bollywood film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Batmanlogo.jpgEdit

 

The file File:Batmanlogo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!Edit

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

XmasEdit

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:27, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

A cookie for you!Edit

  Good to see that you are back!!! SirEdimon (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft helpEdit

Hello could you please assist me regarding the draft Draft:Meri Pehli Mohabbat as I have submitted it for Article for creation AR.Dmg (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trigon DC Comics.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Trigon DC Comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 10:42, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Netherlands and Flanders) listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Netherlands and Flanders). Since you had some involvement with the List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network (Netherlands and Flanders) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paper Luigi TC 12:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Tristan_(disambiguation)Edit

Tristan Cooke's stage name is Tristan and I think I'll add article about him, but even that in disambiguation pages there are non existing pages like Tristan (poem), I think he's known enough person to have a page on Wikipedia, can I edit this page again when there is article about him? jcubic (talk) 09:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Film stub templatesEdit

"Decade-canada-film-stub" is not redundant with "Quebec-film-stub" — for starters, you may have noticed that the national parent category is subdivided by decade, while the provincial subcategory is not. So decade-Canada sorting is always essential on every Canadian film that has stub templates on it at all, with zero exceptions — the Quebec template can sit alongside the decade-Canada template as a second sorting criteria where that's deemed useful, but cannot replace decade-Canada outright, because decade-Canada is the most important and salient and critical point. If Category:Quebec film stubs were being subdivided by decade, then it wouldn't be a big deal — but since it isn't, the by-decade scheme in Category:Canadian film stubs takes precedence in terms of which stub templates are required to be there and which ones are optional. Bearcat (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry Bearcat, but I disagree. Film stub templates are only subdivided by decade, when the parent category becomes too large. Since "Decade-canada-film-stub" and "Quebec-film-stub" are both subcategories of "Canada-film-stub", it is redundant to have both of them on the same article. And per WP:STUB, "If a more specific stub template than is currently on an article exists and completely covers the subject of the article, remove the more general template and replace it with the more specific type." Therefore, since "Quebec-film-stub" is more specific than "Decade-canada-film-stub", again it is redundant to have both of them on the same article. Fortdj33 (talk) 15:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
"Quebec-film-stub" is not more specific than "2010s-Canada-film-stub". The "more specific" rule only requires diffusion of the undifferentiated "Canada-film-stub", while Quebec and decade-Canada are parallel but non-contradictory siblings at the same level of "more specific". Since Quebec-film-stub subcategorizes films by province while decade-Canada-film-stub subcategorizes them by timeframe, Quebec is not a more "more specific" level that vitiates the need for a film to be sorted as decade-Canada at all — especially given that Quebec is the only Canadian province that actually has its own dedicated film stubs category at all, while by-decade is the scheme that actually exists at a comprehensive level, it's essential that the films stay present in the by-decade tree alongside all other Canadian films from that decade, so that they don't get missed by people who are using the genuinely comprehensive scheme instead of the one-off oddball. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Distant Voices Still Lives.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Distant Voices Still Lives.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Tina Ballerina listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tina Ballerina. Since you had some involvement with the Tina Ballerina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Goveganfortheanimals (talk) 07:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of See Jack RunEdit

 

The article See Jack Run has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable stub; film doesn't appear to have had any impact. I couldn't find any reviews or mentions other than to support that it was made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Schazjmd (talk) 23:58, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ThePhotographer2000.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ThePhotographer2000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

"Ramu (1966 Telugu film)" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ramu (1966 Telugu film). Since you had some involvement with the Ramu (1966 Telugu film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Infinity (Marvel Comics).jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Infinity (Marvel Comics).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!Edit

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kup (Transformers) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kup (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kup (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Female Autobots for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Female Autobots is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female Autobots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star BrigadeEdit

 

The article Star Brigade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT+WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ninja ForceEdit

 

The article Ninja Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this toy line related to a fictional military organization (from a game/action product series) passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT+WP:OR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Battleforce 2000.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Battleforce 2000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Iron Grenadiers.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Iron Grenadiers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NinjaForceLogo.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:NinjaForceLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OktoberGuard1297693386.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:OktoberGuard1297693386.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Python Patrol Logo.gifEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Python Patrol Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Brigade Logo.gifEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Star Brigade Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flipside (Spider-Man 2099).jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Flipside (Spider-Man 2099).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Season's GreetingsEdit

  FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!Edit

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 21:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HomerHappyGhost1.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:HomerHappyGhost1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

"Kaa (Oriya fim)" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kaa (Oriya fim). Since you had some involvement with the Kaa (Oriya fim) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Creation of Gilpertpedon stand alone articleEdit

New Updates & Messages For Active Participants in the Marvel Comics work group

  • Current message (25/1/2020)

Greetings to you all & a great weekend. I took the iniative to send this mass message to you all because I observed from the article on Elders of the Universe that certain key members of the Elders of the Universe have no article of theirs and most glaring is that of Gilpertpedon/The Runner. I believe subject has become notable enough for a stand alone article & it would be a great idea for someone in possession of a picture of the runner which is their own work (as to avoid image copyright violations) to begin the article. Then the rest of us contribute to the article’s development.Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Pending Action Requiring Urgent AttentionEdit

Greetings to you all & a great weekend to you all. I want to use this medium to remind us that certain imperative actions such as the under listed actions still need to be attended to

And most imperative;

  • Recruit interested editors who have shown interest in our Marvel community.

Sent by Celestina007 on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Marvel Comics work group. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:GI-JOE-Movie-Figure-Roadblock.jpgEdit

 

Thank you for uploading File:GI-JOE-Movie-Figure-Roadblock.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussionEdit

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BatmanInferno.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BatmanInferno.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hellrazor Marvel Comics.pngEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Hellrazor Marvel Comics.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

What I said in the Hasbro Comic Book Universe talk page.Edit

After some time, I decided to withdraw about what I said about the renaming the article Hasbro Comic Book Universe, because there is no other better name for that franchise, as many fans named it that way. Until the official name is confirmed by IDW Publishing and Hasbro, we keep that name as it is. Thank you, anyway. F. E. Puricelli (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

File:SilverSable3.gif listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SilverSable3.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:09, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DreadnokBuzzer.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DreadnokBuzzer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MonkeywrenchBF.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:MonkeywrenchBF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RoadPigBF.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:RoadPigBF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

"Ram Janmbhoomi ( Movie )" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ram Janmbhoomi ( Movie ). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 7#Ram Janmbhoomi ( Movie ) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WildWeasel.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:WildWeasel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GIJoeDefiant.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:GIJoeDefiant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RipperGIJoe.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:RipperGIJoe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Voltar1514223-1.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Voltar1514223-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crocmaster.gifEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Crocmaster.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CobraTerrordrome2.jpegEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CobraTerrordrome2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HeavyMetal1114.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:HeavyMetal1114.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mobat1.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mobat1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Skystriker1.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Skystriker1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CobraRattler02.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CobraRattler02.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CobraHISS.JPGEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CobraHISS.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jinx307027.jpg listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jinx307027.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

File:BillyGIJoe.gif listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BillyGIJoe.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

File:GIJoeSpirit.jpg listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GIJoeSpirit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Flint Retaliation.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Flint Retaliation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HeavyDutyTROC.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:HeavyDutyTROC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lady Jaye Retaliation.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Lady Jaye Retaliation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lift-Ticket1103.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Lift-Ticket1103.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IcebergRAH.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:IcebergRAH.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)