September 2016 edit

Hey, you seem to enjoy posting on talk pages. Unfortunately, all but one of them are nothing but forum posts whose purpose seems to be to start some kind of chatter about illegal immigration, the Evil Left Wing Liberals, Hillary Clinton's campaign, etc. Your last edit was such a violation that it had to be scrapped as a violation of WP:BLP. Please refrain. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey, you seem to enjoy posting incoherent remarks. Who are you? I have four advanced degrees, am a veteran, and have not edited anything on Wikipedia in over 10 years because Wikipedia has devolved into Liberalpedia. Illegal immigration is a real and valid issue; indeed, you can wake up and recognized that there was just a national election largely on that issue. Please refrain from posting until you can identify yourself as something less cryptic than user:Drmies. What the heck is a "user:Drmies"?

Who awards advanced degrees to someone so stupid and ignorant ... Liberty U? "user:70.44.233.118" is complaining that "user:Drmies" is cryptic? Their remark is not incoherent, you're just an imbecile. They didn't say that illegal immigration isn't a real and valid issue, just that Wikipedia talk pages aren't for discussion of issues, moron. It's people like you who force the recognition that the right wing is comprised of garbage ... idiots, jackasses, liars, sociopathic scum of the earth. Any position that you argue against gains credibility by the fact that you oppose it, you cretin. -- Jibal (talk) 02:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Report regarding disruptive editing. edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Edaham (talk) 00:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN talk to me 00:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Consider this your last warning. Any more posts like this with unfounded insinuations or pure whinging like this will result in a block. --NeilN talk to me 00:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply