69.243.78.25

August 2022

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Stuart J. Ritchie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 20:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

Thanks for working to improve wiki accuracy. I am having trouble adding citations and references, but Ritchie's book advocating open science ("Science Fictions") is already referenced on the page. He's also written several other pieces that may be cited for this, such as this one: https://worksinprogress.substack.com/p/notes-on-progress-doing-science-backwards

Hope that helps,

amateur editor 69.243.78.25 (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023

Hello, I'm Aviram7. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dan Ariely—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 11:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

This edit was for accuracy. As reported extensively in the page, Areily is widely suspected of scientific fraud. Removing the edit reverts the page to a distorted introduction. 69.243.78.25 (talk) 16:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Further explanation: I see you just made another edit, now to the first sentence of the lead. It got almost immediately reverted as it does not obey Wikipedia policies. Please don't make such high profile changes to a biography of a living person unless you are better accustomed with Wikipedia policies. If you feel like the article is not neutral, please discuss on the talk page first. AncientWalrus (talk) 19:48, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

---