69.162.8.80

March 2013

Hello, I'm 069952497a. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pete Rose because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 15:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nevada National Guard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ijon (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nevada National Guard, you may be blocked from editing. Ijon (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pete Rose was changed by 69.162.8.80 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885819 on 2013-03-29T19:55:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pete Rose with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 20:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pete Rose was changed by 69.162.8.80 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911751 on 2013-04-06T16:00:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivory. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ivory was changed by 69.162.8.80 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967987 on 2013-04-08T00:23:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ivory with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 00:31, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Johnnie Ray has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Johnnie Ray was changed by 69.162.8.80 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962376 on 2013-04-15T22:48:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Johnnie Ray, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm Weedwhacker128. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Pete Rose, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Weedwhacker128 (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 3,000 hit club. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Minima© (talk) 15:17, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 20:27, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Prescott, Arizona. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Speed climbing. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bellagio (resort and casino). DVdm (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Prescott, Arizona shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Acroterion (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please be aware that Wikipedia is not a place for free promotion. Please read WP:PROMOTION.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkdw^talk 21:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Hello, I'm Aaron Booth. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Jersey Boys, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 22:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to 311 Boyz, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 03:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lakeview, Illinois may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• and they welcomed the freed men with open arms.<ref>"Memories of Lakeview, Jewell Cofield, 1976}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at M1 Abrams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 18:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at M1 Abrams, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W ^talk 18:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of the M1 Abrams. Thomas.W ^talk 18:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.162.8.80 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The edits made to M1 Tanks are completely true and in no way vandalism. You must have no idea how to tank at all.

Decline reason:

Rhymes with tanker. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for people who want to have a bit of fun in between trying their luck at the slot machines. So your hoax/joke edits don't belong here. And, yes, I know what a tank looks like from the inside, having spent far too much time inside one. Thomas.W ^talk 19:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
• If your claim in the last sentence is true, then you would know the Turret Monster is no hoax or joke. I'm declaring shenanigans on you spending any time inside a tank.

As I said, this is an encyclopedia, not a place for jokes. Thomas.W ^talk 19:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm not joking; you have no concept of tank turret operations if you don't know what a Turret Monster is, or believe it to be fictional. You have no credibility here.

I know what a turret monster is said to be, but I also know the difference between fact, like what we want here on Wikipedia, and fantasy, like what you tried to add. So over and out, buddy. Thomas.W ^talk 19:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Of course you know what a Turret Monster is said to be NOW, you read my good-faith edits (which were filled with facts backed up by years of empirical research). Of further damage to your already flagging credibility, however, is the incorrect radio procedure you're using in an attempt to end this discussion. And I'm not your "buddy," friend.

FYI I'm British, not American (as can be seen on my user page). In case that makes you feel any better. You probably got the entire MGM Mirage temporarily blocked, BTW, so some people there might not like it. Thomas.W ^talk 19:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

I doubt anyone here has an immediate need to update Wikipedia. Your irrational denial of the Turret Monster aside, you seem to be an OK fellow. Challenger 1, 2, Chieftain, or Centurion???

October 2016

Hello, I'm EricEnfermero. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Moose Haas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 20:57, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---