August 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Death of Prince. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop recreating articles that have been redirected after an AFD. You've done it twice to this article and once to Reactions to the death of Prince. You can open discussions on the parent articles' talk pages about splitting the articles, but do not keep recreating them. Meters (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Death of Prince, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Death of Prince. It was redirected at AFD. It needs consensus to split. You having started a discussion 4 minutes earlier is not consensus to split the article. Meters (talk) 22:40, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Meters: Can you please stop following me around and reverting my edits? I want to hear your thoughts on the Death of Prince having its own article. There aren't any responses yet, and I even mentioned your name in the discussion. See Talk:Prince (musician) and talk to me about this. 50.226.46.222 (talk) 23:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've redirected Prince Rogers Nelson‎ to Prince (musician). We do not need another article at his birth name. This is a clear case for a redirect from a birth name. Stop creating all of these articles.

And as for [1] and the above, t's entirely up to me when I comment on a thread, or if I choose to do so at all. As a matter of fact, I had already commented at Talk:Prince (musician) before you posted the above. Perhaps you should have looked first. Meters (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • IP, I concur with what Meters is saying. You need to stop trying to recreate articles that were turned into redirects due to a properly run AFD. If you don't understand this process, please by all means feel free to ask. However, continuing to edit war as you have done and try to force the recreation of these articles is going to end in you very likely being blocked. Please stop. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

August 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Araratic | talk 23:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Purple rain (film), you may be blocked from editing. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince (singer). Donner60 (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SpencerT•C 03:29, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Listen, I'm so fucking sorry for being such a bad user. Can you please unblock my fucking IP and let me talk to somebody? 50.226.46.222 (talk) 21:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Optimist on the run (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand that what I did was completely wrong and I won't do it again. I'm not stupid at all. Wikipedia's rules are stupid, which is why I want to make this website great again. This site just doesn't need rules anymore. Let me do whatever the fuck I want. 50.226.46.222 (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

While you hold these beliefs about Wikipedia you have no chance of being unblocked. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.226.46.222 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please let me edit Wikipedia again. I won't add anymore nasty things about Prince anymore. I'll be a much better editor from now on. In this case, blocking me is completely pointless. If you want to talk to me personally, my phone number is (redacted). 50.226.46.222 (talk) 22:18, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Removing talk page access due to numerous disruptive requests. RickinBaltimore (talk) 22:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.