February 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SillyBilly70 (talkcontribs) 09:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm AirWolf. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Economy of Serbia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.--AirWolf talk 15:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Serbia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--AirWolf talk 10:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Serbia, you may be blocked from editing. --AirWolf talk 14:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Economy of Serbia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Serbia. --AirWolf talk 18:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mkdwtalk 20:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by GDP (PPP), you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sock puppetry

edit

  Hello, 46.17.125.210, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Simba222 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.--Zoupan 19:47, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit

  Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Belgrade, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.