43.241.132.78

This is 43.241.132.78's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codingal (September 8)

Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JSFarman were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Hindu Times article is great but the other references used don't go toward notability. To establish notability, mulitple references via indepdendent, reliable sources that cover Codingal, specifically, are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Codingal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Julie, Thank you for reviewing the AfC. I think the references from The Hindu, India Today, VCCircle, EdTechReview, Entrepreneur.com, The Economic Times (which is a part of The Times of India group) and Mint are all reliable sources.

The article has been rewritten to meet the Neutral Point of View.

Can you please guide me more. Thank you for your support. 43.241.132.78 (talk) 13:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi and apologies on the delay. I only just came across your note. If you're leaving a message for another editor, they will not be notified unless you ping them by username. (For example: [[User:JSFarman|JSFarman]].)

Your edit is good but notability has not yet been established. If an article is based on a press release it isn't considered independent. The Economic Times and Mint are both based on a press release -- they use the same quote from the COO (as do other articles via less-reliable sources). The Entreprenuer article is written by a contributor, not a staff member, and, as such, is not considered reliable. It's hard to take ANI seriously given the issues with the content (repeated sentences, etc). Coverage needs to be extensive, and of the seven references from The Hindu, only one has signficant editorial on Codingal. The other references are via niche or trade publications as far as I can tell.

Sorry I can't be of more help. Thanks for the message. JSFarman (talk) 20:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 43.241.132.78! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bilby (talk) 21:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

Add topic