2A00:23C8:8B04:2F01:30EE:787F:4D6A:7C4B

This is 2A00:23C8:8B04:2F01:30EE:787F:4D6A:7C4B's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tatiana Suarez-Pico (May 9) edit

Latest comment: 11 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tatiana Suarez-Pico and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 2A00:23C8:8B04:2F01:30EE:787F:4D6A:7C4B! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Latest comment: 10 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for consideration. Though I do not understand, how, for instance, a person like this gets a wikipedia page....Hilary Bettis#cite note-2

This person has less citations and doesn't have articles about her that are not from a blog and the citations do not meet this criteria: "that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)."

And there are countless of examples. The page I submitted has over 10 citations referencing the person and somehow the person does not qualify. I am confused. 2A00:23C8:8B04:2F01:30EE:787F:4D6A:7C4B (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

Add topic