Only warning: Falsifying discussion outcomes edit

I see that you've edited constructively before, including regarding University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication, so I have no clue what led you to think it was a good idea to falsify the outcome of that article's AfD, but please consider this your only warning for that or any similar disruptive editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 04:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Oregon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EMH333 (talk) 00:41, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome! edit

 

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to University of Oregon! If you are interested in continuing to edit, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! EMH333 (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Bharel. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Phil Knight, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you're adding something contrary to reports, please provide proof. Bar Harel (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2023 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Century Initiative, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply