24.154.205.176 (talk) 04:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Personal request, unblock this immediately.24.154.205.176 (talk) 04:58, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NFL on CBS has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1994–95 New Jersey Devils season, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 2602:306:3357:BA0:3D1C:6D71:19AF:2388 (talk) 02:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1994–95 New Jersey Devils season, you may be blocked from editing. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 03:07, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nyttend (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

24.154.205.176 (talk) 03:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)DJsasso, unblock it.24.154.205.176 (talk) 03:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DJSasso (talk) 14:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.154.205.176 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm convincing Djsasso to my request of unblocking my edit, that I'll won't do it again, through and through.24.154.205.176 (talk) 02:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

(1) I will repeat what Huon told you in answer to an earlier unblock request: "You'll have to address the past issues in greater detail to enable us to ascertain that you have understood why your behaviour was problematic and to tell what you'll do to prevent those issues from re-occurring." This latest unblock request does even less to address that than the earlier one to which that was a reply. (2) As long as your original account is blocked, you do not have permission to edit Wikipedia at all, except for the talk page of that account, so requesting unblocks of IP addresses is pointless. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.154.205.176 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

When I edited the 1994-95 New Jersey Devils season earlier this year, I did so with disruptive editing for which I apologize for that.24.154.205.176 (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Per the above unblock requests, we need more information so you can convince us you won't be immediately disruptive upon unblocking. Why exactly was it disruptive, and what do you plan to do to address the behaviour? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.154.205.176 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It was disruptive because of my failure or refusal to get the point straight across, I also plan to really change my behavior editing wise to make things a little easier 24.154.205.176 (talk) 02:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I'd advise you to take the standard offer. You can make the request at that time at your main account, SNIyer12, as you did with your April 2015 request at User_talk:SNIyer12#Unblock_Request.—Bagumba (talk) 05:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK, I'll take the standard offer and wait it out for six months.