220.101.15.162

January 2017

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to E233 series have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 209 series, you may be blocked from editing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@K6ka: Where is the Level 2 warning? 220.101.15.162 (talk) 01:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 209 series. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Plants vs. Zombies— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zuma (video game). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:15, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plants vs. Zombies, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Plants vs. Zombies was changed by 220.101.15.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903882 on 2017-01-20T07:59:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bejeweled 3.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bejeweled 3 was changed by 220.101.15.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871591 on 2017-01-20T08:08:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Banned

I Have Been Blocked By User:Materialscientist, And I Don't Wanna Be Blocked! :(

This Isn't Even Very Good! :(

I Need To Have A Good Reason! :(

I Want To Be Here To Build An Encyclopedia... :(

I Don't Really Wanna Let Anyone To Block Me! >:(

Hello! Hello, admins! Please unblock me! I did not receive any warning, notification or opportunity to discuss Oshwah's concern prior to my banning and I am not a vandal. Oshwah does not allow users to e-mail him and I cannot post on Oshwah's user talk page or any admin page to discuss this! --220.101.15.162 (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

You did not receive any warning?! What do you think all those things above this section are? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:40, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Still Banned

I haven't heard anything about why I was banned, how long I will be banned or whether there has been any review progress. --220.101.15.162 (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Getting Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.162 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry! --220.101.15.162 (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

When I consider appeals like this my main thought is "Will unblocking be to the benefit of Wikipedia?". Now that I have examined your contributions, which consist of repeated vandalism (of which you even boasted on at least one occasion), the answer is a big and obvious No. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Getting Unblocked 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

220.101.15.162 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm So Sorry User:Materialscientist! :( I'm Going To Make Some Helpful Contributions! :) 220.101.15.162 (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Highly unconvincing attempt at parroting. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egerton Crescent. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Thegreatgrabber (talk) ^contribs 04:51, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Charles Boxshall, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Thegreatgrabber (talk) ^contribs 04:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Thegreatgrabber (talk) ^contribs 04:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of Mon, 12 Jun 2017 04:58:10 GMT for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  – Gilliam (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---