Your submission at Articles for creation: Union Pacific 4005 has been accepted

edit
 
Union Pacific 4005, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ratnahastin (talk) 09:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 4451 (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 210.185.110.172! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Pacific 4274 (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Trainsandotherthings (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Union Pacific 4005

edit
 

The article Union Pacific 4005 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This has been WP:REFBOMBed to make it appear more notable than it is. By my analyis only two of the citations cover the topic in any depth and they are identical (one being an archive of the other). The rest are either about other topics or only cover the subject in passing. I can not see how this passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarnishedPathtalk 08:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply