Following SPECIFICO around?

edit

I am not following SPECIFICO around. If you would check most of those interactions are to do with Julian Assange. I am also interested in a number of areas, you might be interested in User_talk:NadVolum#Alerts where SPECIFICO just dismissed my idea for an article as quack. That was long before I knew he was involved in economics as well and you can see my impression of economics there. ANyway if you read my comment I'm suggesting to Pauloroboto that they accept SPECIFICO's reversion and try doing smaller edits with justification for each. Can't say I'm a fan of SPECIFICO but how exactly is that supposed to be disagreeing with them? NadVolum (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vinerian Scholarship, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Gobonobo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kirsty Blackman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. gobonobo + c 22:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.