192.251.69.4

June 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

192.251.69.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Visited Universal did nothing wrong.192.251.69.4 (talk) 21:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Adding sources after damage totals in infoboxes

Hello! I saw in this edit, you removed some citation needed templates off damage totals in infoboxes. Normally, the sources are listed just after the damage total in the weather infoboxes, regardless of them being listed elsewhere in the article. Examples of that are Salado tornado & Winterset tornado from this year. Based on your comment, I am assuming you are the same user who filed the AN/I against my edits about the RfC, so I am not going to revert, but I urge you to either readd the citation needed templates in the infobox or, better yet, actually copy/paste (or fully add) any sources for the damage totals into the infobox. Elijahandskip (talk) 03:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello, I'm ObserveOwl. An edit that you recently made to David Yost seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ObserveOwl (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---