188.148.229.11

Welcome!

Hi 188.148.229.11! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Evermore (Evermore album)

Hey. I just want to let you know why I redirected Evermore (Evermore album) again. It doesn’t meet the general notability guidelines because it has one actual source. The West Australian is a source that can be used. There are also two links to 7digital sources and one link to Amazon, all of which should be removed from the article per MOS:ALBUM#Track listing. There is also the NZ hung median source.

Two sources isn’t enough to warrant an entire article, especially when one is a charting source. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 14:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Benefits of registering

Hi. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. I hope you stick around. Have you considered creating an account? There are a range of benefits in doing so. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Critics' Choice Super Awards

Your request at WP:RM/TR has been contested, so is now open for discussion at Talk:Critics' Choice Super Awards. - Station1 (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Adding year parameters to chart citations

These were unnecessary to add to chart citations when you went about updating the Swedish chart peaks. Readers could already tell the chart was published in 2021 both from the URL and the access-date, so it adds nothing. An actual publication date would be more helpful than a generic year. If the date is not clear or unknown, it's best to leave anything publication date-related out entirely. Thank you. Ss112 15:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:What Other People Say, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tommy has a great username (talk) 15:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:NOTBROKEN was not written to justify including redirects to non-existent articles

WP:NOTBROKEN was written for editors who bypass redirects by linking directly to a target or by obscuring a redirect by piping links, hence the name: we shouldn't (always) avoid linking to redirects because they're not broken. That is not what this instance is. You're arguing we should include a link to a song that doesn't have an article because it might have one made for it. Now sure, you could argue that NOTBROKEN says "redirects can indicate possible future articles" but as I've now repointed One More Time (Robin Schulz and Felix Jaehn song) to the article for IIII, as songs should be pointed to their parent album if the album has an article, it constitutes a self-redirect and the link has been removed. If you are concerned about including the link, start the article for the song. Don't fight to include links to redirects by citing guidelines that were not written for that purpose. Thanks. Ss112 14:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Another thing to bear in mind is that we generally should assess linking to redirects based on how helpful it is to readers to include a link to that redirect. If the original target for the song had've been retained, it would not be particularly beneficial to readers to link back to a discography article they might have just come from before navigating to the album article and that doesn't have any different information about that song than the album article does. Ss112 15:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! 188.148.229.11 (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Montero

Thanks for expanding the article. I have nominated it for DYK. You can see it here, where you can also add additional hooks that you consider interesting for the Main page. Regards. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Montero (Call Me by Your Name)

On 14 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montero (Call Me by Your Name), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the music video for "Montero (Call Me by Your Name)", Lil Nas X gives Satan a lap dance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montero (Call Me by Your Name). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Montero (Call Me by Your Name)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Swedish component charts

There is no point in including the Vinyl Albums chart when an album already charted on the Swedish Physical Albums chart. Physical album sales obviously include vinyl so it is redundant. It really just seems like you're looking for extra charts to add for something to do. Nobody really cares about these Swedish component charts to begin with, as Sweden is a particularly small market in terms of music revenue sales worldwide. I could think of at least 10 other countries whose component charts more people would care about than Sweden's. We need to draw the line somewhere with what we choose to add, because Wikipedia is not an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information. Please bear this in mind next time you want to add Sweden's component charts. Thank you. Ss112 12:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hey Boy (Sia song), did not appear constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melmann 10:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello Chloemimi (talk) 17:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Swedish charts

If another editor (in this case, me) has started updating a certain batch of something, don't try and jump ahead of them to do the rest of the charts. I am certain you just saw the rest of the singles chart peaks updated. I edit conflicted with you on Bo Burnham discography, and that is annoying, I would prefer to avoid it. Ss112 12:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I did not see the rest of them because I started at the bottom of the list. 188.148.229.11 (talk) 12:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I find that hard to believe considering that when I've been late some weeks, you always started doing the higher chart positions first, and the fact that one needs to load the whole page (as it's not all pre-loaded) to even get to the bottom. Ss112 12:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I am not a robot so I do not do the same thing every single time. Could you please assume good faith? I am always just trying to make some positive changes on Wikipedia and every time you message me, it's to criticise me for something I'm doing "wrong". It's honestly discouraging. 188.148.229.11 (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

---