October 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Japanese adult adoption has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Central Plaza (Hong Kong). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 18:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Victoria, British Columbia, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Disney California Adventure. Serols (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Student. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Ifnord (talk) 21:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kanazawa. SolarFlashDiscussion 20:22, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


  This IP address seems to be in use strictly to vandalize Wikipedia. If you continue to make unconstructive edits, as you did at Cape Breton Regional Municipality, you will be blocked from further editing. SolarFlashDiscussion 20:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

February 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Instant noodle have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Benaweephopia

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Benaweephopia, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benaweephopia (February 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Spiderone was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 184.69.124.182! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply