edit

  Hello 172.59.209.161! Your additions to FDR Drive have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Does sourcing them really not count as crediting them? 172.59.209.161 (talk) 01:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, there's a difference between "rephrasing, based on sources" and "copying sources directly." Cremastra (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Gaismagorm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 737 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gaismagorm (talk) 23:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

thanks know-it-all. 172.59.209.161 (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. —C.Fred (talk) 23:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

National varieties of English

edit

  Hello. In a recent edit to the page Applegreen, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.