October 2019 edit

 

Hello 151.197.63.153. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic,

false.  the edits do not give any impression.  i do not get paid for editing.  the edit (only one) was correct and sources provided.  people kept deleting it before i was even finished editing. (they tried deleting the talk page too) sources were posted on the talk page. they are factual and supported with u.s. links and isbn numbers.  this edit is to correct your shill editors who delete christian business owners out of racist financial interest.  YOU have the financial interest in attacking the vape inventor.. the interest is to harm him by lying about the invention. you are activly attacking him and that is not wiki policy.  


 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression ... Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:151.197.63.153, and the template {{unPaid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=151.197.63.153|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS💬 17:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
you provide no encyclopedic reason to delete the invention of tube shape vapes.  only theories (that a christian might venifit) and lies about the sources (which are valid).

you are therefore an obvious bigot. (with a financial interest im harming the actual inventor of tube shape vapes, an mazing piece of christian history)

you are obviously hostile to my areas of knowledge.. so having an account would be pointless. i would like to help wikipedia to filter attacks like yours.  you have no right deleting facts you did not research. 
the three day block was extended to aweek inapropriatly and i was prejudiciously attacked because you had an "IMPRESSION". your bias against the inventor is obvious and you did not follow wiki policy because you have only unsupported claims and lies.. the sources are factual and you are attacking the inventor out of your expressed financial motive to harm.  you are way out if bounds. it even runs afowl of anti trust laws 15 usc 2 and 4.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott Burley (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

151.197.63.153 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

vaporizer(inhalation dvice) talk page has links posted. attacker (talk) simply claims (with no proof that magazines, books, isbn numbers and u.s. patents are somehow "not reliable". he is a jihadist intend on toppleing the inventor of tube shape vapes. a brit who knows the same guy was instrumental in launching the www in 1988. it is you job to stop illigal attacks on u.s. businesses. that is attacks indended to de fame literally to reduce ant mention. hideing inventors is not wiki policy. the links are factual and the government is notable as are popular authors and magazines. here are three links: u.s pto publications: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=30&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=7,415,982&OS=7,415,982&RS=7,415,982 Ed Rosenthal, 2002 'Ask Ed' http://twitter.com/TheUbie/status/1186679857750728704 Skunk Magazine 2009 http://twitter.com/TheUbie/status/1186677736280072193 please ban scott and his five acomplaces for gross vandalization with intent to "defame by extinguishment". they know better and lack character to edit wikipedia. if you would like a calculation about how many lives the invention has saved (per year) then, the CDC claims vapes are about 99% less toxic than smoking. smoking causes 30% of ALL cancer (yes there are links for these too) givem the size of the vape market about 5 Billion per year the number of vape users (not smoking) is very large.. just divide by the average expendature of 400$ per year for the number.. then we also know from Reynolds studies of live tissue that volatazing prevents at least 90% of tumors. (cdc says 99%). and the American Lung association has claimed for many years thatbquitting smoking by age 35 saves 8.5 life years.(im the remaining 35 years.) so that's about 5,000,000,000,000/400 or about people vaping each year 1/35th of the 35 years and saving 8.5 years per person.. or about 12.5 million (people) maybe closter to 18 million now.. saving about 8.5 years each (per 35 years) which is 106.25 million people times 8.5/35 life years DIVIDED by the average age remaining.. roughly 35 years to unfold.. leaving about 86,734,693 american lives saved because of tube shape vapes EVERY YEAR try it your self. the number of life years has to be difided by the average age.. so it could be higher. there is no question that the data os correct and the links provided as reliable. wikipedia is charged with unrliability. there is no public scruteny of these edits. only back alley attackers. please stop attacking american history here. tube vapes were invented and it is very notable. how many life years saved do you calculate? the amount of data is extencive. but dont vandalize editsmyou have not researched. restore thisnuser and take out the crazy attackers.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for making unsourced edits. I have verified that you did not provide citations when making the edits. It is not relevant that you have sources now, you were required to provide reliable sources meeting WP:RS to WP:CITE your additions at the time you were making them. You may also want to read WP:NOR. Yamla (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify or remove a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. If you wish to make another unblock request, you are welcome to do so. First, read WP:GAB. Then, show that all of your edits included an appropriate citation matching WP:RS or WP:CITE. Nothing else is relevant apart from your failure to provide reliable citations for your edits. It's not relevant that you could have done, it's relevant whether or not you did (which you clearly didn't). --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Vaporizer (inhalation device) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 12:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

As you immediately resumed your inappropriate editing once your prior block expired, I have blocked you again. We can keep doing this until you stop editing like this. --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

i did not edit. please show proof.

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply