Neil Coyle

edit

Regarding Neil Coyle, another editor has removed the JVL as poorly sourced (diff). I was of the mind to reinstate it when it was removed, but the sources used are suspect: The Canary which is a partisan site with verification issues and allegations of anti-Semitism itself, the WP:PRIMARY source from JVL which cannot stand with a reliablle source reporting it, and a source from Southwark News which is an independent publication with uncertain verifiability. Also, it is on the editor seeking to add content to gain consensus first: WP:ONUS. As another editor has already removed it, it would not be right for you or me to re-add it without first discussing it. (PS: JVL is not the primary source, but reporting what The Canary reported.) Solipsism 101 (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archie Henderson-Cleland (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 143.159.171.113! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply