Please discuss my alternative account Nomromex here.

13aunihert, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi 13aunihert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi 13aunihert! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 09:49, Monday, June 27, 2016 (UTC)

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

13aunihert (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I just realised my account had been blocked this morning when I logged in and upon further investigation discovered the reason for my block I believe is absurd. I understand that maybe my alternate account Nomromex might have caused an issue with sockpuppetry, but not in the manner stated on my user page. I decided to investigate the linked account Royer2356 and discovered it was blocked over 4 years ago. Can you please explain to me why I'm blocked, as this account isn't used abusively, which can be found in my contributions and neither is my alternate account. I'm not a sockpuppet of the user stated on my userpage and the strikingly different contributions show that. I sometimes use a public network in my place of study and may have left myself logged in by mistake. Can you explain to me what evidence you might have to link me to an account which was blocked over 4 years ago? 13aunihert (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Materialscientist:The user makes a point that this acxcount wasn't used the same way as the ones listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Royer2356/Archive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

That may be so, but the CheckUser evidence is completely unambiguous. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply