October 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jesus College, Cambridge, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jan1naD (talkcontrib) 21:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Cambridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at University of Oxford, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Your addition to List of Merlin episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Xeworlebi (talk) 20:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Rednex, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2011 edit

  Your recent edit to the page Sudan appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Erik Lönnrot (talk) 19:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at University of Oxford. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC) ‎Reply

May 2011 edit

 

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cambridge. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - JCJ (talk) 12:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to University of Oxford with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Monty845 14:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Hai2410 with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 15:32, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Rednex. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

131.111.243.142 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Term time is over and a large number of students have returned home. Very strong likelihood that those responsible for the block have departed us. I request an unblock on these grounds. Please consider.

Decline reason:

Any Cantabridgian who wishes to edit and does not have an account can create one somewhere else or request it through email; those users with accounts can request IP block exemption if they do not already have it. In other words, it's really not necessary to lift blocks based on academic schedules. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patricia Bentancur. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hallows AG (talk) 23:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

131.111.243.142 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

"Several months have now passed - is it still necessary to maintain the block? I'm pretty sure that several people on this IP address are able to contribute constructively to articles, and the block could be restored pretty quickly if there is another outbreak of vandalism."

Decline reason:

This IP address is not currently blocked. Closedmouth (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to St John's College, Cambridge with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. QU TalkQu 19:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Union Jack, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 01:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Wdchk. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Blue (university sport) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Wdchk (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nicholas of Cusa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, TransPennine Express, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.