Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Batangas City worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. The following is the content of your previous edit in Batangas City as shown below.

.. tae si vilma

Please, Wikipedia is not the proper forum for your grievances or disappointment. If you have any grievances with this person, try to air your grievances to the proper office. Thanks. Kampfgruppe (talk) 07:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Online shopping worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 17:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Online shopping constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 17:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Ong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anirudh Emani (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Our Lady of Peñafrancia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Our Lady of Peñafrancia was changed by 125.212.34.94 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-09-24T04:48:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Template:Philippine regions, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss World 2010. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John KB (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Patti Smith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Liturgical year worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   09:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2011 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Armed Forces of the Philippines, you may be blocked from editing. See this edit. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:05, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Enchong Dee has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 12:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kathryn Bernardo with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 03:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eduardo V. Manalo, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Norm (sociology) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Grafen (talk) 10:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Arnold Sodeman. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GrayFullbuster (talk) 14:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit tests on Corn starch edit

  Hello, I'm 28bot. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Corn starch that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,