Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 116.231.75.71, has made edits which do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 14:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Radiotelephone edit

Talk:Radiotelephone Re "tit" definition. - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Hagennos. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Sting without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HagennosTalk 03:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Sting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Travelbird (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Travelbird (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Bellezzasolo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Arthur Foss— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Bellezzasolo Discuss 13:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, 116.231.75.71. You have new messages at Bellezzasolo's talk page.
Message added 10:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Bellezzasolo Discuss 10:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Rifleman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 12:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Cnbrb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Darth Vader have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Cnbrb (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marin County, California, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Correct grammer edit

"Glass's" should be "glass' " 109.199.156.251 (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply