114.134.140.31

On Nagasaki's case count in Template:COVID-19_pandemic_data/Japan_medical_cases

Hi there,

Thanks for keeping Template:COVID-19_pandemic_data/Japan_medical_cases up to date! You recently increased the case count in Nagasaki prefecture from 17 to 166, but the 149 cases on Costa Atlantica is already counted in a separate row. In order to avoid double-counting, I am reducing it to 17 again. I think this is in line with almost all official COVID-19 stats in Japan (MHLW, NHK, Nagasaki prefecture). Please let me know if you think strongly that Costa Atlantica cases should be mixed into Nagasaki's count.

Thank you. オオカワウソ (talk) 09:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I am the editor who is undoing your edit on Nagasaki's case count (17 → 166) repeatedly. I am sorry if you find it frustrating, but I have already written my rationales above. In addition to them, you can find that the vast majority (if not all) of Japanese COIVD stats exclude the 149 Costa Atlantica cases from Nagasaki's cases by comparing search results on 長崎 covid "166" and 長崎 covid "17".

If you believe the 149 cases should be in Nagasaki's count, could you (1) cite an official stats doing it, (2) delete the Costa Atlantica row, and (3) delete the footnote on the exclusion of Costa Atlantica cases? Otherwise your edit (17 → 166) makes the table wrong.

Of course having a discussion on the issue on the talk page (or here) is much more appreciated.

Thank you.

(Japanese translation)

こんにちは。

長崎の数字を 166 から 17 に減らしているのは私です。お気を悪くされたらすみません。ただ、理由については上述の通りです。(日本のどの公式な統計でも、長崎の感染者数 17 になっています。 例: 厚労省, NHK, 長崎県。) また、長崎 covid "166" と 長崎 covid "17" の検索結果を比べてみれば、その差はさらに明らかになります。

もしどうしてもコスタ・アトランチカの 149 件も長崎に数え入れなければならないとお考えであれば、それを行っている公式な統計情報を引用した上で、コスタ・アトランチカの行を消し、かつコスタ・アトランチカは含まないとしている脚注も消してもらえますか？ そうしないと、この表自体が嘘になってしまいます。

もちろん、この件について talk ページやここで議論できればその方が嬉しく思います。(日本語でも英語でも構いません。)

よろしくお願い致します。 オオカワウソ (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thanks a lot for reading my comments. (I assume so because you deleted the footnote on the exclusion of Costa Atlantica cases unlike your previous edits). Could you add a citation of some official statistics which include Costa Atlantica's cases into Nagasaki's cases? If you cannot add it to the page (you seem to be using mobile visual edit), you can just paste it here and I may be able to help adding the citation. Thank you. オオカワウソ (talk) 19:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Japan medical cases—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Japan medical cases, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Japan medical cases, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Japan medical cases. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

---