109.78.212.25

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 109.78.212.25, has made edits to Charlie's Angels (2019 film) that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! KyleJoan^talk 16:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

We can agree to disagree but accusing me of disruptive editing is just rude and disingenuous. -- 109.78.212.25 (talk) 22:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

When was the word disruptive ever uttered? KyleJoan^talk 02:45, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

The edit summary said the template used by Kyle Joan was Welcome-anon-unconstructive and it accused me of vandalism, ie disruptive editing. You can disagree with my edits but disagree with changes specifically instead of using generic templates which use harsh words like unconstructive and vandalism to describe edits you disagree with. -- 109.79.184.96 (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2019

Your recent editing history at Charlie's Angels (2019 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 02:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Charlie's Angels

In all seriousness, you seem to have a lot of ideas regarding how the critical response section should look in terms of structure and use of conjunctions. Why not rewrite it completely and present the version with your proposed changes on the talk page and see which version other editors prefer? KyleJoan^talk 02:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

We had a minor disagreement about prose style.[1] We discussed in the edit summaries on the article. KyleJoan escalated to talk page warnings. I didn't see any point in taking it any further, it wasn't about substantive meaningful changes to the article so I dropped it. -- 109.79.184.96 (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

---