Welcome! edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a certain number of days and made a certain number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (109.235.153.213) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! –eggofreasontalk 20:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request for help edit

Good afternoon, I'd like to open 4 new pages. I published 4 drafts some days ago (titles: "Seminar on Youth", "The Standard Life of a Temporary Pantyhose Salesman", "Sodomies in Elevenpoint", "Uses and Abuses") but the pages haven't been opened yet. Also the page "Aldo Busi" that I've been editing for a while at the top says «page issues». Can you please help? 109.235.153.213 (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

When you think the drafts are ready to go into the encyclopedia, put "{{subst:submit}}" at the top of the draft. That will create a little box that alerts reviewers that the draft needs review. It can take quite some time (a few weeks in some cases) after that before someone gets to it. That said, if I were you before adding that I'd try to add a little more information to those articles and add some citations to secondary sources. As for Aldo Busi, I see you have put a lot of work into expanding it, and it looks like you may have used the Italian Wikipedia article for some of it as the tag suggests. If you feel there would be no additional benefit to someone translating the Italian article feel free to remove that tag, however I see the Italian article looks like it still has sections we don't, and definately has more sources than we have, therefore it may be premature to remove it. However, I can't read Italian so I don't know how valuable that content is or if it is duplicated in our article. Either way, I would leave the additional citations needed tag on ours as it doesn't cite very many. I hope this helped answer your questions; let me know if you need further help. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:45, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aldo Busi has been reverted.
Your edit here to Aldo Busi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IFlpiMdrWck) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uses and Abuses (January 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 12:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 109.235.153.213! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 12:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seminar on Youth (February 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Standard Life of a Temporary Pantyhose Salesman (February 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Archive