107.190.69.245

July 2024

Hello, I'm Rusty4321. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 Mannheim stabbing have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rusty ^{talk contribs} 17:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

The entire first paragraph of the section "stabbing" had no information about the stabbing and instead focused on one of the victims. Either the section should be renamed or more emphasis on the actual stabbing need to be published. A strong smell of political bias in the first paragraph. If you want to delve into the life and times of Michael Stürzenberger, do it in another section of the article. 107.190.69.245 (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

I think the popular term for this first paragraph is "victim blaming". 107.190.69.245 (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi 107.190.69.245! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2024 Mannheim stabbing several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2024 Mannheim stabbing, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---