User talk:+JMJ+/Archives/2024/January

4th (3rd East Prussian) Grenadier Regiment moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 4th (3rd East Prussian) Grenadier Regiment. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and P. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

@FULBERT But it has sources, at the very bottom. It's just that the footnotes haven't been added. +JMJ+ (talk) 19:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Major cosmetic changes

Hi!

Can you elaborate on your rationale for your recent changes to division list templates?

Also, they’re not frequently edited templates. It would be more convenient for other editors who’re viewing the history if you would make changes together (edit count-related benefits notwithstanding…)

Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 12:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, @RadioactiveBoulevardier! Hopefully my edits did not upset you. My reasoning was the following:

1) my edits simplify the templates for the reader

2) minimize useless repetition of words - we don't need to read the word division 50 times in a template exclusive dedicated to divisions only! The same goes for divisions that have the same type, so it seemed sensible to have a "child" section of e.g. the type of division to group those together and remove repetitions.

3) I thought my edits made the templates look cleaner, because it lessened the text presented to the reader, but guards and even improves the ability to find the articles through the template. I removed the endings from numbers like "th", "rd", "nd" because those do not add any information that is not there already with the number and it looks better (in my opinion, obviously).

Cheers, +JMJ+ (talk) 12:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4th (3rd East Prussian) Grenadier Regiment (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4th (3rd East Prussian) Grenadier Regiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

@Mach61, Reinhard Nelke / preussenweb.de has been already used in other Wikipedia military history articles on en.wiki [1] and especially de.wiki [2] and no one batted an eye. The website's content itself is based on extensive literature [3]. The website and its creator are also mentioned in the reference work "The History Highway: A 21st-century Guide to Internet Resources":

"Developed by Reinhard Nelke, Prussian Web houses a wealth of information on the state of Prussia, which existed as a kingdom from 1701 to 1918 and as a state within Germany from 1918 to 1947, when it was abolished by the Allies after World War II. The historical overview describes the growth of Prussia after 1701 to become the most powerful state in northern Germany and the one that unified a "small" Germany, which excluded Austria, in 1871. Besides the extensive historical overview, the site contains maps of Prussia's growth, a list of its provinces and rulers since 1134, an extensive treatment of its army's history, links to biographies of important Prussians, links to other sites on Prussian history, and a bibliography. This German-language site is a strategic place to start the study of Prussian history on the Web."

The website's content is certainly based on good sources, because it is very accurate and extensive. I do not understand why this perfectly fine website should be rejected. +JMJ+ (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the text of policy is very clear that Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. Existing use in Wikipedia or vouching in books unrelated to the field don't count. You can either cite other sources, such as the ones you say the website is based on, or provide evidence the author has been published in military jouranals or other reliable sources covering the Prussian military. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, +JMJ+! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)