User:The High Fin Sperm Whale/RfA expectations

These are my expectations that I think RfA candidates should have. If they do not meet these standards, I will vote oppose or neutral. Do note that in the "Participation in admin areas" section, I will only look at the contributions in the areas the candidate says he will be working in, so if he says he will work in one area, I will not review his edits to other areas. Also, every person is different, so these are just rules of thumb - they are not meant to be followed to the letter. There will be exceptions. If you think that these standards are not fair, please do not modify them, but post comments here.

RfAs edit

Criteria Likely to vote support Likely to vote neutral Likely to vote oppose
Experience and edit count
Account created 1 year ago or more 3 months-1 year less than three months
Edit count (non-automated, I will not count edits made with automated tools) 2,000 + 1,750-2,000 1,000 -
Participation in admin areas
AfDs and XfDs 75 + 50-75 50 -
CSDs 200 + deleted contributions 200-100 deleted contributions 100- deleted contributions
AIV, RFP, AN, AN/EW, AN/I, UAA, SPI, etc. 100 + 75-100 75 -
Behavior
Block log 6 + months ago 6-3 months ago 3 - months ago
Edit warring No EWs in the last 9 months ago EWs 9-6 months ago EWs 6 - months ago
Usage of Edit Summaries 90%+ 90-75% 75%-
Behavior on his RfA
Responses to opposes Responds in a civil and calm manner Responds in a somewhat civil manner Makes personal attacks and behaves immaturely
Responses to questions Tells the truth and answers the question Tries to avoid the question Tells a blatant lie

RfBs edit

Criteria Likely to vote support Likely to vote neutral Likely to vote oppose
CHU, CHU/SUL, and CHU/U 150 + edits 150-100 edits 100- edits
RfAs and RfBs 100 + 100-75 75-
BTR 150 + 150-100 100-