Here are the articles that were created or expanded by students in Semester 2 of the 2013–2014 academic year. (The articles are in the process of being edited and made publicly available on Wikipedia.)
← 2012–2013 |
Group | Section G2 | Section G3 |
---|---|---|
1 | Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General Please write part of an article about Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General [2013] 4 S.L.R. 1, C.A., that summarizes the Court of Appeal's views on the interpretation of Art. 49 of the Constitution of Singapore. |
Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v. Attorney-General Please write part of an article about Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v. Attorney-General [2013] 2 S.L.R. 619, H.C., and [2013] SGCA 56, C.A., that summarizes the Court of Appeal's views on the interpretation of Art. 144 of the Constitution. |
2 | Judicial review in Singapore Please write the part of this article dealing with judicial review of administrative action in Singapore. |
Judicial deference Please expand the existing short article "Judicial deference". This article currently focuses on United Kingdom and United States law, so please add information about Singapore law to it. |
3 | Hinds v. The Queen Please prepare an article on Hinds v. The Queen [1977] A.C. 195, P.C. (on appeal from Jamaica). |
Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu v. Public Prosecutor Please prepare an article on Mohammad Faizal bin Sabtu v. Public Prosecutor [2012] 4 S.L.R. 947, H.C. |
4 | Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law Please write a section on the law relating to prematurity and exhaustion of remedies. |
Yong Vui Kong v. Attorney-General Please prepare an article on the parts of Yong Vui Kong v. Attorney-General [2011] 2 S.L.R. 1189, C.A., dealing with the application for the recusal of the Chief Justice and the submission that the Cabinet was affected by apparent bias. |
5 | Lim Meng Suang and another v. Attorney-General Please write an article about Lim Meng Suang and another v. Attorney-General [2013] 3 S.L.R. 118, H.C. |
Tan Eng Hong v. Attorney-General Please write part of an article about Tan Eng Hong v. Attorney-General [2013] 4 S.L.R.(R.) 1059, H.C., which deals with Art. 12 of the Constitution. |
6 | Judicial review in Singapore Please write the part of this article dealing with judicial review under the Constitution in Singapore. |
Tan Eng Hong v. Attorney-General (standing) Please write part of an article about Tan Eng Hong v. Attorney-General [2012] 4 S.L.R. 476, C.A., which deals with standing. |
7 | Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v. Attorney-General Please write part of an article about Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v. Attorney-General [2013] 2 S.L.R. 619, H.C., and [2013] SGCA 56, C.A., that summarizes the Court of Appeal's views on standing. |
Yong Vui Kong v. Attorney-General Please prepare an article on the parts of Yong Vui Kong v. Attorney-General [2011] 2 S.L.R. 1189, C.A., dealing with the justiciability of the clemency process. |
8 | Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General Please write part of an article about Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General [2013] 4 S.L.R. 1, C.A., that summarizes the Court of Appeal's views on standing. |
Threshold issues in Singapore constitutional law Please update the "Standing" section with information from Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General [2013] 4 S.L.R. 1, C.A., and Jeyaretnam Kenneth Andrew v. Attorney-General [2013] SGCA 56, C.A. |
Accolades
editOn 6 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that in a 2013 case, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that the Prime Minister was wrong to say he had discretion under the Constitution not to call a by-election to fill a parliamentary vacancy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vellama d/o Marie Muthu v. Attorney-General. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC) |
Participants
editGroup 1 | Group 5 |
Group 2 | Group 6 |
Group 3 | Group 7 |
Group 4
|
Group 8
|
Group 1
|
Group 5 |
Group 2 | Group 6 |
Group 3 | Group 7 |
Group 4 | Group 8 |