Welcome to Senior Trend's talk page

Please place comments at the bottom of this page and include a section heading if it is a new subject. Also, add your signature using four tildes

Welcome! edit

Hello, Seniortrend, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Tomcheek.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Tomcheek.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tomcheek.JPG edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Tomcheek.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Acather96 (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of Reception of Country Music edit

Thanks for notifying me about this. I just posted the follwing on that discussion page (mispellings and all). Without reviewing all of the policy links, etc, whcih in the end seem to be merely guidelines subject to interpretation, I have to say that I don't know why anyone would eb interested in an "encyclopedic" article on something that would best be covered in a discussion forum, or an academic treatment, or a just plain opinion piece. If someone wants to bring facts on record sales, or the demographics of those those sales, concert attendence figures, number and location of radio stations devoted to country western by decade, etc, that may be pretinent. (In fact some of that information is in the article. But this article nominated for deletion seems out of place in wikipedia. Furthermore, the material in the artcle under discussion does not seem appropriate for an encycopedia. In summary, I am in favor of deletion. Steve Pastor (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wayne Gretzky edit

There has been an endless edit war for months and months. I have simply removed the nationality from the lead altogether. I realy think per the MOS there is no need to mention his nationally in the lead at all - plus sounds odd hes a retired Canadian? We cant keep edit Waring over this silly point.Moxy (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply