Reason: Non-notable, somewhat amateurishly-produced relatively new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: Non-notable journal, not indexed in any selective database. The three sources listed in the article are 2 interviews with the journal's editors in Kritikos (itself of dubious notability) and an article written by one of the journal's editors. No independent sources available. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: Six issues published over 10 years, not indexed anywhere (let alone in selective indexes), no independent sources, according to journal's own homepage a grand total of 229 subscribers. Utterly non-notable publication, does not meet WP:NJournals (insofar one wants to consider this an "academic journal") nor WP:GNG (or any other possibly applicable notability guideline).
Reason: Only claim to notability is a silly claim to be world record holder for number of soaps and business cards collected. Only independent references are to "Indian Book of Records" and the "Limca Book of Records" (i.e., not Guinness). One reference to news site of unclear notability, but in any case is just a few lines (i.e., not in depth). Claim to have founded a company of unclear importance named "Medical Darpan" are supported by a blog post that doesn't mention the subject of this article. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG.
Reason: Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases (ESCI is not selective), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: Non-notable irregularly-appearing journal with only 4 issues published. Not indexed in any databases (selective or otherwise; does not even list an ISSN), no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: No independent sources, not indexed anywhere. Only claim to fame is having been included on Beall's list. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.
Reason: Promotional stub about a non-notable organization. Only claim to fame is inclusion on Beall's list of predatory publishers. No indication this is a bona-fide professional organization.
Reason: Non-notable new journal, likely predatory. Website lists fake impact factors. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: Official website is a Wordpress blog. Apparently this publication does not even have an ISSN, let alone that it is indexed in any selective database. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals (insofar applicable to a literary magazine) or WP:GNG.
Reason: No indication of notability. Sources are either not independent or don't mention the subject. Only one source (The Independent) is more than an in-passing mention, but that is not enough for WP:BIO or WP:GNG.
Reason: Likely predatory journal: website promotes "Research Gate impact factor", a paltry Google Scholar 5-year h-index of 7, indexing in databases that are either fake (e.g., Index Copernicus) or trivial (e.g., OCLC), claims indexing in Scopus (but was in fact delisted in 2016 when Scopus removed a large number of predatory journals), weird page for editorial board with disfigured photographs, ungrammatical English, and more signs of not being a legitimate academic publication (see [ttps://thinkchecksubmit.org/ Think Check Submit]). Article lists a smattering of in-passing mentions in some newspapers, but no in-depth coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG. Does not meet WP:NJOurnals or GNG. Hence: delete.
Reason: Unsourced bio of editor of predatory journal. Very modest citation record (see GScholar profile) does not indicate that this meets WP:ACADEMIC.
Reason: No independent references. Group seems to be moribund, website doesn't appear to have been updated since 2014/2015 (list books from that period as "Just published"... Like most researchs groups, this does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG.
Reason: Huge amount of original research (see edit summary of article creator). Not a single source showing notability of the concept of "songs about animal rights". WP:INDISCRIMINATE.
Reason: Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources apart from two general registration sites. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
Reason: Drummed up bio with large list of publications by (not about) the subject. Is said to be "president" (in fact, secretary general) of the grandiose sounding "World Congress of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Techniques", which, in fact, has just 51 members... No indication whatsoever that this meets WP:ACADEMIC.
Reason: Non-notable journal, included on Beall's list of predatory journals (info removed by anonymous IP). Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.