This is an informal and incomplete list of templates used in arbitration, mostly by the arbitration clerk team, assembled for convenience. Arbitrators and arbitration clerks are allowed to edit this page.
Notification templates edit
Cases and case requests edit
Filing a case:
{{subst:Arbcom notice|<request name>}} ~~~~ |
|---|
|
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks,
|
Opening a case:
{{subst:ArbComOpened|<case name>|days=<days until evidence; normally 14>|party=<yes/no>}} ~~~~ |
|---|
|
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 27, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Example/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~~~~
|
Notice to trim case request statement:
{{subst:ArbComSize|<request name>}} ~~~~ |
|---|
|
Hi, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}. I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). Thank you for making a statement in an arbitration request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case. However, we ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Your statement significantly exceeds this limit. Please reduce the length of your statement when you are next online. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence; in any event, concise, factual statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the arbitrators.
Requests for extensions of the word limit may be made either in your statement or by email to the clerks email list. For the Arbitration Committee, |
Declined premature case request:
{{subst:Arb premature|<content/conduct/admin>}} |
|---|
|
In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has decided that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.
|
Unofficial edit
Notice to trim evidence submission: {{subst:User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/EvidenceSize|1=<# words or # diffs>|2=<case name>|party=<yes or no>}} ~~~~
|
|---|
|
Hi, {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}. The Arbitration Committee has asked that evidence presentations at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/{{{2}}}/Evidence]] by parties be kept to around 1000 words and 100 diffs. Your presentation is over {{{1}}}. Please edit your section to focus on the most relevant evidence. If you wish to submit over-length evidence, you must first obtain the agreement of the arbitrators by posting a request on the /Evidence talk page.
For the Arbitration Committee,
|
Motion passage notice; see documentation at User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/Motion
|
|---|
|
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by [[Special:PermaLink/{{{1}}}|motion]] that:
{{{2}}} For the Arbitration Committee, ~~~~
|
ARCA close notification; see documentation at User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/ARCACloseNotice
|
|---|
|
Hi L235/ArbClerk, the [[Special:PermaLink/{{{1}}}#{{{2}}}|{{{2}}}]] arbitration clarification or amendment request, which you were listed as a party to, has been archived to [[{{{3}}}]]. For the Arbitration Committee,
|
ARCA edit
Filing an ARCA; party notification:
{{subst:Arbitration CA notice|<request name>}} ~~~~ |
|---|
|
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment# and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks,
|
Misc edit
Casenav used at the top of case pages:
{{Casenav}}. Update contents at Template:Casenav/data. | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD
|
|
Arbitration Committee proceedings
[edit]
Open cases [edit]
Recently closed cases (Past cases)
No arbitrator motions are currently open. |
Links to ArbCom pages:
{{ArbCom navigation}} | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Implementation notes for use on case PD pages. See Template:ACImplNotes for documentation.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision—at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion to close the case until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
These notes were last updated by 18:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC); the last edit to this page was on 18:10, 3 September 2018 (UTC) by AnomieBOT.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Editnotice and page notice for use on closed Evidence/Workshop pages:
{{Arbitration case phase closed}} | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Template for calculating majorities:
{{ACMajority|active = <#>|inactive = <#>|recused = <#> <|motion = yes>}} | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
For this case there are 15 active arbitrators. 8 support or oppose votes are a majority.
|
For preliminary statements on a case's evidence page: {{User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/Preliminary top}} and {{User:L235/ArbClerk/Templates/Preliminary bottom}}.
|
|---|
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
|