Wikipedia

User:Herna327/sandbox

< User:Herna327

Article Evaluation - Pasteurization

Although everything in the article is relevant to the topic, some sentences and their wording were distracting upon reading the article. Additionally, some of the points throughout were random (but still somewhat relevant) to the article. The article was written in a neutral tone, but I felt like some view points were overrepresented (alcoholic beverages section) while others were underrepresented (microwave volumetric heating section). The main topics of the article were the history and process of pasteurization, with the main focus being milk. Personally, I would have liked to see the article extended in terms of the "Products that are commonly pasteurized" section and further exploring the conditions and reasons as to why those products (beer, canned food, dairy products, eggs, milk, juices...) are pasteurized.

All of the citations I reviewed were working and supported the claims. Two of the 64 references used had "help" error yet I was still able to navigate to the sites with the hyperlink provided. Multiple of the references were obtained from government and education websites such as USDA, CDC, HHS, and Michigan State University, while many others were from journal articles published in journals such as Journal of Food Protection, Journal of Dairy Science, and British Dairy Journal - to mention a few. There were several books cited, which are reliable and non-biased sources, which are adequately used throughout. However, some of the references were not properly cited (three that I came across [Source 10, 24, and 25]). Those three improperly cited references appeared to be of news articles, which could express biased opinions; however, I was unable to note whether or not there was bias in the WikiPedia article as I could not track down those sources given their vague description/improper citing. Although the information in the article was useful, there is additional information that could be added just by reading our class textbook (3rd edition), that would provide more in-depth information of pasteurization. Additionally, new articles/research could be added given the recent advances in technology (mainly in regards to validation of pasteurization). In the "Talk" page of the article there are a few conversations of what is being covered in the article (flash pasteurization and the article lacking basic information and focusing greatly on milk). The article is currently rated a B-class article and is also of interest in two WikiProjects. Overall, the article is a good, basic beginning to inform readers of pasteurization, but can improve in terms of depth and grammar.

Article(s) of interest:

  • High Pressure Processing - the "Talks" page only discussed a potential merge between HPP and another article (high pressure food preservation) and how HPP foods are used in the UK. The foods section could be thoroughly expanded given the advantages of HPP and how it is now used world-wide. The article is useful but VERY basic and can be used to further educate readers given new HPP research and history since the 1990s.
  • Pasteurization - can improve on the basic information as suggested in the "Talks" page. Although the article is focused on milk, it can be expanded as mentioned above in other products commonly pasteurized. The "specifics/parameters" of pasteurization and its respective equipment could be improved and better explained to readers.
  • Hurdle Technology - only two section in entire article (hurdles and synergistic effects). Can further elaborate on many points to educate readers. Nothing has been previously discussed in the "Talks" page.
  • Food Irradiation - article explores a wide variety of sections, but very basic and superficial information. Can also focus more on the foods commonly exposed to irradiation and the process of irradiation. Additionally, the article could improve on the three most common forms of irradiation (gamma, UV, and e- beam).

Self-Assigned Article: Food Irradiation. Plan on cleaning up the citations and incorporate more food products and effects throughout the article. Additionally, plan on organizing and updating the "Treatment" section, focusing on the process of irradiation. As mentioned above, will improve on the three most common forms of irradiation and and known advantages and disadvantages. The "History Timeline" located at the bottom of the article can also be improved in the sense that the bullet points can be eliminated and turned into sentences and paragraphs given the references on each bullet point and history of irradiation.

The following are several references that will be used to improve the article:

  • Food Processing Technology Principles and Practice - Book by P.J. Fellows
  • Irradiation for Quality Improvement, Microbial Safety and Phytosanitation of Fresh Produce - Book by Peter A. Follett and Rivka Barkai-Golan
  • Food Irradiation Research and Technology - Book by Xuetong Fan and Christopher H. Sommers
  • Irradiation of Food Commodities: Techniques, Applications, Detection, Legislation, Safety and Consumer Opinion - Book by Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis
  • Journals - El Sevier, Journal of Food Quality, Trends in Food Science and Technology
  • Government Websites - USDA/FDA/HHS

Group: AJ* and Priscilla - *AJ's Sandbox will be used for the group project.

Food Irradiation Article Review

  • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

There was only one irrelevant point in the article, which was pertaining to irradiating medical devices. As the article is specifically called “Food Irradiation,” I felt that it was not relevant to article as medical devices would not fall under the umbrella of food. In my opinion, there was nothing greatly distracting in the article, however, felt that some topics were vague and could be elaborated upon - hence me being passionate about this article.

  • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

Although the article has a distinct “Public Perception” section, there are controversial claims throughout the article without a citation. Such examples include the safety and reactivity of irradiated foods. Although the claims are correct, they need proper citation and need to be edited so they portray the information in a neutral position.

  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

In my opinion, the article does a good job of laying down the basics of food irradiation but needs work in further explaining some sections including the “Public Perception” section stated above, “Treatment and Process” section and subsection respectively, and the “Timeline/History” section. Additionally, a greatly underrepresented section is the equipment used for irradiation, which would be added by our group. Lastly, the article is missing additional information regarding the three most common forms of irradiation, which would also be added by our group.

  • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

There was a total of 106 citations, and after doing a citation check, I noticed multiple “Anonymous” references. There were also multiple sources with errors in the references mainly missing the reference title and date. Also, some links were not scientifically grounded and were from organizations for/against irradiation. Upon clicking on the links, there were two sources that I noticed with either incorrect links. The other references I clicked on (journal articles and government websites) were functioning and adequately supported the claims throughout the article.

  • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Each fact is not referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. The article is missing references throughout and is minutely biased. The minor bias was noticed throughout, especially in regards to controversy/public perception of food irradiation. More so, the bias was noticed mainly on negative claims of irradiation, which would be correctly referenced by our group.

  • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

Information is not out of date, but could be elaborated on with recent research on irradiation. Additionally, with technological advances and recent publications, the article could be improved.

  • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

There are three conversations going on in the “Talk” page - two of which have issues of references (under referencing sections and inadequate/unreliable references) while the third conversation discusses misleading phrases. There is also a “To-Do” list that can be elaborated upon.

  • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

The article is an article of interest in the following three WikiProjects: WikiProject Medicine (B-class, low-importance), WikiProject Technology (B-class, no importance information), WikiProject Food and Drink (C-class, high-importance).

Evaluate how you can contribute to an existing article (create an outline indicating sections to improve), or contribute a new article (write the lead and create outline).

CURRENT Sections (hyperlinked and in blue); future contributions by group (denoted in black)

**Improvements throughout:

  • Remove irrelevant and biased claims
  • Improve citations with dependable and appropriate references from sites stated above (try to remove any/all unreliable and biased references)

AJ: units related to food irradiation, advantages and disadvantages of food irradiation, packaging associated to food irradiation, and recent history.

Priscilla: lead, treatment, uses

Food irradiation is the process of exposing food and food packaging to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation, such from gamma rays, x-rays or electron beams, is energy that can be transmitted without direct contact to the source of the energy (radiation) capable of freeing electrons from their atomic bonds (ionization) in the targeted food. The radiation can be emitted by a radioactive substance or generated electrically. This treatment is used to improve food safety by extending product shelf-life (preservation), reducing the risk of foodborne illness, delaying or eliminating sprouting or ripening, by sterilization of foods, and as a means of controlling insects and invasive pests. Food irradiation primarily extends the shelf-life of irradiated foods by effectively destroying organisms responsible for spoilage and foodborne illness and inhibiting sprouting. Although consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation are generally negative when compared with those processed by other means due to the misconception that food becomes radioactive or mutated, all independent research, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have confirmed irradiation to be safe.

Food irradiation is permitted by over 60 countries, with about 500,000 metric tons of food annually processed worldwide. The regulations that dictate how food is to be irradiated, as well as the food allowed to be irradiated, vary greatly from country to country. In Austria, Germany, and many other countries of the European Union only dried herbs, spices, and seasonings can be processed with irradiation and only at a specific dose, while in Brazil all foods are allowed at any dose.

Contents

edit

 [hide]

Uses[edit]

edit

Irradiation is used to reduce or eliminate the risk of food-borne illnesses, prevent or slow down spoilage, arrest maturation or sprouting and as a treatment against pests. Depending on the dose, some or all of the pathogenic organisms, microorganisms, bacteria, and viruses present are destroyed, slowed down, or rendered incapable of reproduction. Irradiation cannot revert spoiled or over ripened food to a fresh state. If this food was processed by irradiation, further spoilage would cease and ripening would slow down, yet the irradiation would not destroy the toxins or repair the texture, color, or taste of the food. When targeting bacteria, most foods are irradiated to significantly reduce the number of active microbes, not to sterilize all microbes in the product. In this respect it is similar to pasteurization.

Irradiation is used to create safe foods for people at high risk of infection, or for conditions where food must be stored for long periods of time and proper storage conditions are not available. Foods that can tolerate irradiation at sufficient doses are treated to ensure that the product is completely sterilized. This is most commonly done with rations for astronauts, and special diets for hospital patients.

Irradiation is used to create shelf-stable products. Since irradiation reduces the populations of spoilage microorganisms, and because pre-packed food can be irradiated, the packaging prevents recontamination into the final product.

Irradiation is used to reduce post-harvest losses. It reduces populations of spoilage micro-organisms in the food and can slow down the speed at which enzymes change the food, and therefore slows spoilage and ripening, and inhibits sprouting (e.g., of potato, onion, and garlic).

Food is also irradiated to prevent the spread of invasive pest species through trade in fresh vegetables and fruits, either within countries, or trade across international boundaries. Pests such as insects could be transported to new habitats through trade in fresh produce which could significantly affect agricultural production and the environment were they to establish themselves. This "phytosanitary irradiation" aims to render any hitch-hiking pest incapable of breeding. The pests are sterilized when the food is treated by low doses of irradiation. In general, the higher doses required to destroy pests such as insects, mealybugs, mites, moths, and butterflies either affect the look or taste, or cannot be tolerated by fresh produce. Low dosage treatments (less than 1000 gray) enables trade across quarantine boundaries and may also help reduce spoilage.

Treatment[edit]

edit

Up to the point where the food is processed by irradiation, the food is processed in the same way as all other food. To treat the food, they are exposed to a radioactive source, for a set period of time to achieve a desired dose. Radiation may be emitted by a radioactive substance, or by X-ray and electron beam accelerators. Special precautions are taken to ensure the food stuffs never come in contact with the radioactive substances and that the personnel and the environment are protected from exposure radiation. Irradiation treatments are typically classified by dose (high, medium, and low), but are sometimes classified by the effects of the treatment (radappertization, radicidation and radurization). Food irradiation is sometimes referred to as "cold pasteurization" or "electronic pasteurization" because ionizing the food does not heat the food to high temperatures during the process, and the effect is similar to heat pasteurization. The term "cold pasteurization" is controversial because the term may be used to disguise the fact the food has been irradiated and pasteurization and irradiation are fundamentally different processes.

Treatment costs vary as a function of dose and facility usage. A pallet or tote is typically exposed for several minutes to hours depending on dose. Low-dose applications such as disinfestation of fruit range between US$0.01/lbs and US$0.08/lbs while higher-dose applications can cost as much as US$0.20/lbs.

Process[edit]

edit

Typically, when the food is being irradiated, pallets of food are exposed to a source of radiation for a specific time. Dosimeters are placed on the pallet (at various locations) of food to serve as a check and ensure that the correct dose was achieved. Most irradiated food is processed by gamma irradiation., however the usage of electron beam and X-ray is becoming more popular as well [1]. With gamma irradiation, special precautions are taken because gamma rays are continuously emitted by the radioactive material. In most designs, to nullify the effects of radiation, the radioisotope is lowered into a water-filled storage pool, which absorbs the radiation but does not become radioactive. This allows pallets of the products to be added and removed from the irradiation chamber and other maintenance to be done. Sometimes movable shields are used to reduce radiation levels in areas of the irradiation chamber instead of submerging the source.[citation needed] For x-ray and electron irradiation these precautions are not necessary as the radiation is generated by electricity, the source of the radiation can be switched off.

For x-ray, gamma ray and electron irradiation, shielding is required when the foods are being irradiated. This is done to protect workers and the environment outside of the chamber from radiation exposure. Typically permanent or movable shields are used. In some gamma irradiators the radioactive source is under water at all times, and the hermetically sealed product is lowered into the water. The water acts as the shield in this application.[citation needed] Because of the lower penetration depth of electron irradiation, treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes is not possible.[citation needed]

Dosimetry[edit]

edit

The radiation absorbed dose is the amount energy absorbed per unit weight of the target material. Dose is used because, when the same substance is given the same dose, similar changes are observed in the target material. The SI unit for dose is grays (Gy or J/kg). Dosimeters are used to measure dose, and are small components that, when exposed to ionizing radiation, change measurable physical attributes to a degree that can be correlated to the dose received. Measuring dose (dosimetry) involves exposing one or more dosimeters along with the target material.

For purposes of legislation doses are divided into low (up to 1 kGy), medium (1 kGy to 10 kGy), and high-dose applications (above 10 kGy).[citation needed] High-dose applications are above those currently permitted in the US for commercial food items by the FDA and other regulators around the world. Though these doses are approved for non commercial applications, such as sterilizing frozen meat for NASA astronauts (doses of 44 kGy) and food for hospital patients.

Applications By Overall Average Dose
Application Dose (kGy)
Low dose (up to 1 kGy) Inhibit sprouting of bulbs and tubers 0.03–0.15 kGy
Delay fruit ripening 0.03–0.15 kGy
Stop insect/parasite infestations to help clear quarantine 0.07–1.00 kGy
Medium dose (1 kGy to 10 kGy) Delay spoilage of meat 1.50–3.00 kGy
Reduce risk of pathogens in meat 3.00–7.00 kGy
Increase sanitation of spices 10.00 kGy
High dose (above 10 kGy) Sterilization of packaged meat 25.00–70.00 kGy
Increase juice yield[citation needed]
Improve re-hydration[citation needed]

Technology[edit]

edit

Efficiency illustration of the different radiation technologies (electron beam, X-ray, gamma rays) See also: Electron beam processing

Electron irradiation uses a stream of electrons accelerated by an electric voltage or radio frequency wave to a velocity close to the speed of light. Electrons have mass and negative electric charge, and therefore electron beams at the energies allowed for food irradiation do not penetrate into the product beyond several centimeters, depending on product density. Therefore, electron beams are preferred for thin products

Gamma irradiation involves packets of light (photons) that originate from radioactive decay of atomic nuclei. Gamma rays are used for products that are too thick for treatment with electron beams. Every radioactive element gives rise to Gamma rays with specific energies characteristic of the source element, these rays have zero mass and no electrical charge. The ones used for food irradiation are able to penetrate through food products. The radioactive isotope radioisotope cobalt-60 is used as the source in all commercial scale gamma irradiation facilities. Gamma irradiation is most widely used technology because the deeper penetration of the gamma rays enables administering treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes (reducing the need for material handling) and it is significantly less expensive than using an X-ray source. Cobalt-60 is bred from cobalt-59 using neutron irradiation in specifically designed nuclear reactors. In limited applications caesium-137, a less costly alternative recovered during the processing of spent nuclear fuel, is used as a radioactive source. Insufficient quantities are available for large scale commercial use. An incident where water-soluble caesium-137 leaked into the source storage pool requiring NRC intervention has led to near elimination of this radioisotope.

Irradiation by X-ray is similar to irradiation by gamma rays but the rays produced have a distribution of energetic packets of light, still the maximum energy of the produced X-ray photon is limited by the energy put into the X-ray generator therefore it is possible to guarantee that no partials capable of inducing irradiation can be emitted. X-rays are generated by colliding accelerated electrons with a dense target material (this process is known as bremsstrahlung-conversion), and the X-rays so produced have a spectrum characteristic of the dense target material. Heavy metals, such as tantalum and tungsten, are used because of their high atomic numbers and high melting temperatures. Tantalum is usually preferred versus tungsten for industrial, large-area, high-power targets because it is more workable than tungsten and has a higher threshold energy for induced reactions. Like electron beams, X-rays do not necessitate the use of radioactive materials and can be switched off when not needed. X-rays ability to penetrate the target is similar to gamma irradiation. X-ray machines produce better dose uniformity than Gamma rays, and their penetration depth is similar to slightly greater than that of gamma rays, but they require much more electricity as only as much as 12% of the input energy is converted into X-rays.

Cost[edit]

edit

The cost of food irradiation is influenced by dose requirements, volume and type of product, type and efficiency of radiation source, the food's tolerance of radiation, handling conditions, i.e., packaging and stacking requirements, construction costs, financing arrangements, and other variables particular to the situation. In the case of large research or contract irradiation facilities, major capital costs include a radiation source, hardware (irradiator, totes and conveyors, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment), land (1 to 1.5 acres), radiation shield, and warehouse. Irradiation is a capital-intensive technology requiring a substantial initial investment, ranging from $1 million to $5 million. Operating costs include salaries (for fixed and variable labor), utilities, maintenance, taxes/insurance, cobalt-60 replenishment, general utilities, and miscellaneous operating costs. Perishable food items, like fruits, vegetables and meats would still require to be handled in the cold chain, so all other supply chain costs remain the same. In the United States, the cost of food irradiation ranges between $0.02 and $0.40 per kilogram, varying depending on all the variables associated with irradiation. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/38544/9241542403_eng.pdf;jsessionid=43101AD4C8312A2CC88E6287FCE1504D?sequence=1

Impact[edit] --> *Change name to "Effects of Food Irradiation" (section moved to later)

edit

Irradiation reduces the risk of infection and spoilage, does not make food radioactive, and the food is shown to be safe, but it does cause chemical reactions that alter the food and therefore alters the chemical makeup, nutritional content, and the sensory qualities of the food. Some of the potential secondary impacts of irradiation are hypothetical, while others are demonstrated. These effects include cumulative impacts to pathogens, people, and the environment due to the reduction of food quality, the transpiration and storage of radioactive goods, and destruction of pathogens, changes in the way we relate to food and how irradiation changes the food production and shipping industries.

Irradiation primarily extends product shelf-life by destruction of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, delay of sprouting, and disinfestation.[1] Low, medium, and high doses of ionizing energy have shown to be safe and do not make food radioactive. Irradiation causes chemical reactions that result in alteration of the chemical makeup, nutritional content, and sensory qualities of the irradiated food. Consequences of food irradiation include direct and indirect effects, effect on microorganisms, effect on nutrition, and toxicological and radiolytic chemical products.

Immediate effects[edit] **Change to "Direct and indirect effects"

edit

The radiation source supplies energetic particles or waves. As these waves/particles pass through a target material they collide with other particles. Around the sites of these collisions chemical bonds are broken, creating short lived radicals (e.g. the hydroxyl radical, the hydrogen atom and solvated electrons). These radicals cause further chemical changes by bonding with and or stripping particles from nearby molecules. When collisions damage DNA or RNA, effective reproduction becomes unlikely, also when collisions occur in cells, cell division is often suppressed.

Irradiation (within the accepted energy limits, as 10 MeV for electrons, 5 MeV for X-rays [US 7.5 MeV] and gamma rays from Cobalt-60) can not make food radioactive, but it does produce radiolytic products, and free radicals in the food. A few of these products are unique, but not considered dangerous.

Irradiation can also alter the nutritional content and flavor of foods, much like cooking. The scale of these chemical changes is not unique. Cooking, smoking, salting, and other less novel techniques, cause the food to be altered so drastically that its original nature is almost unrecognizable, and must be called by a different name. Storage of food also causes dramatic chemical changes, ones that eventually lead to deterioration and spoilage.

The radiation source supplies energetic particles or waves. As these waves/particles pass through a target material they collide with other particles. Around the sites of these collisions chemical bonds are broken, creating short lived radicals (e.g. hydroxyl radical). These radicals cause further chemical changes by bonding with and or stripping particles from nearby molecules. When collisions damage DNA or RNA, effective reproduction becomes unlikely, also when collisions occur in cells, cell division is often suppressed.

  • How does irradiation work?
  • Compton
  • Direct: "due to direct contact of high energy with specific molecule or cell (DNA) --> nonfunctional = death"
  • Indirect: "produce ion pairs and free radicals, produced mostly by products of water radiolysis, hydroxyl radicals (strong oxidizing agents), solvated electrons (strong reducing agent), hydrogen radicals (strong reducing)"

Effect on microorganisms

Through the use of ionizing energy, irradiation produces deadly effects on microorganisms. Such effects include changes in DNA, RNA, cell membrane structure, and metabolic enzyme activity. DNA and RNA are vital components in the cell nuclei required for cell growth and replication. By altering cell membranes and metabolic enzyme activity, reactive ions injure or destroy microorganisms.[1] Upon treatment, cells fail to replicate due to damage in the DNA and the double helix of the DNA being unable to uncoil to begin replication.[1] Ion production and interaction with DNA greatly determine the damage and rate of destruction of microorganisms, while reduction on cell numbers depends on irradiation dose used for treatment.[1] Sensitivity to radiation is determined in a D10-value. D10-value is defined as the amount of radiation treatment required to reduce the population of a certain microorganism by 90%.[1] The D10-value depends on the bacterium, but is affected by temperature, growth medium, and moisture content. Higher temperatures, simpler growth mediums, and increased moisture content result in decreased D10-values.

Food quality[edit]

edit

Ionizing radiation can change food quality such as nutritional and sensory contents only when very high levels of radiation treatment are used. Commercially, irradiation doses (1-10 kGy) have minimal negative impact on the sensory qualities and nutrient content in foods. However, approved dosages should not be used to replace adequate good manufacturing practices (GMPs), nor are sufficient to successfully sterilize the food product.[2] As a non-thermal process, irradiation keeps nutritional and sensory qualities originally associated with the food product.

Original qualities of the food include macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids), taste, color, and texture. Physical attributes associated with common carbohydrates such as pectin, starch, and gums are greatly affected by irradiation, thereby changing the functionality of the carbohydrates; however, the degree of utilization of the carbohydrates remain unchanged therefore no change in nutritional value is observed.[1] Amino acids that comprise proteins, remain in the same composition and digestible at commercial levels of irradiation.[1] When exposed to high doses of radiation, sulfur containing amino acids methionine and cysteine can change the aroma and taste of food because of oxidation.[1] Foods with high fat content result in lipid oxidation, which produce off-flavors and off-aromas due to byproducts of lipid oxidation- hydroperoxides.[1] Propagation of lipid oxidation in high fat foods makes those foods unsuitable for irradiation due to the quick rancidity. Color, especially in meat and fish, can be altered by irradiation due to oxidation of myoglobin by radiolytic products.

Micronutrients in food irradiated products express similar effects to those of foods processed with other methods- minimally inactivated.[1] This holds especially true for vitamins such as thiamine, ascorbic acid, pyridoxine, retinol, and α-tocopherol.[2] Vitamin inactivation is dependent on the vitamin itself along with dosage and type of product used for irradiation. Water-soluble Vitamin D and Vitamin K are mainly unaffected by irradiation while Vitamin A and Vitamin E are sensitive to radiation.[1]

Sensory qualities such as color, taste, texture, and appearance are not significantly affected by irradiation.[2] Conversely, irradiated celery was found to be superior than untreated celery and blanched, acidified, and chlorinated celery.[3] As for taste, similar to other processes, irradiation can minimally alter the taste of the food. Foods especially sensitive to changes in flavor and color are poultry and pork products.[2] Due to major sensory changes, foods like eggs, milk, dairy, and certain fruits/vegetables, are unsuitable because of volatile off-flavors produced as a result of irradiation.[2]

Although changes in nutritional and sensory qualities by irradiation depend greatly on the degree of treatment and vary among foods, it is well researched that irradiation does not pose greater negative effects on food quality than any other food processing technology.[1]

Chemical changes[edit]

edit

Irradiation does not make food radioactive, but does form radiolytic products (hydrocarbons, aldehydes, and ketones) from ions and free radicals as a result of the high energy. A few of these products are unique, but not considered dangerous. Most of the substances found in irradiated food are also found in food that has been subjected to other food processing treatments, and are therefore not greatly unique. One family of chemicals (2ACB's) are exclusively formed by irradiation (unique radiolytic products), but this product is non-toxic. When irradiating food, all products occur in a lower or comparable frequency to quantities produced by other food processing techniques.

Free radicals form when food is irradiated; however, these products are also present upon oxidation of foods. Most of these are oxidizers (i.e., accept electrons) and some react very strongly. According to the free-radical theory of aging excessive amounts of these free radicals can lead to cell injury and cell death, which may contribute to many diseases. However, this generally relates to the free radicals generated in the body, not the free radicals consumed by the individual, as much of these are destroyed in the digestive process.

The most unique radiolytic product is a family of compounds called 2-alkylcyclobutanones (2-ACBs) formed upon irradiating primarily fatty acids. Alkylcyclobutanones are products obtained only by irradiation as they are yet to be discovered as products in raw or heat-processed foods.[2] However, the genotoxicity of alkylcyclobutanones is yet to be determined, therefore the true impact of them as radiolytic products is unknown.[2] Irradiation, like other treatments, also produces furans, especially in juices high in sugar and acid, fresh fruits and vegetables, and apple cider.[2] Furans are known to be carcinogenic at high doses and are also a form of antioxidants. Furans are also commonly found in baby foods, infant formula, coffee, food mixtures (soups and sauces), fish, canned fruits and vegetables, nuts, and meats.[4] The amount of furans produced by irradiation is to a lesser extent than when foods are heat processed or simply stored under refrigeration.[2] Another carcinogen produced by irradiation of high doses is benzene.[2] Benzene has been discovered in sterilized beef by irradiation, which used doses 35 times as the allowed dosage by regulation.[2]

It is important to remember that all chemical products of irradiation are dependent on the the food matrix and radiation dose used. Also, many of the chemicals produced by irradiation are in low concentrations and are not enough to create radioactive foods. All irradiation products, with the exception of 2-alkylcyclobutanones are also produced by other food processes. Only extremely high doses of chemical products will have carcinogenic effects.The radiation doses to cause toxic changes are much higher than the doses used to during irradiation, and taking into account the presence of 2-ACBs along with what is known of free radicals, these results lead to the conclusion that there is no significant risk from radiolytic products.

Long-term impacts[edit]

edit

If the majority of food was irradiated at high-enough levels to significantly decrease its nutritional content, there would be an increased risk of developing nutritionally-based illnesses if additional steps, such as changes in eating habits, were not taken to mitigate this. Furthermore, for at least three studies on cats, the consumption of irradiated food was associated with a loss of tissue in the myelin sheath, leading to reversible paralysis. Researchers suspect that reduced levels of vitamin A and high levels of free radicals may be the cause. This effect is thought to be specific to cats and has not been reproduced in any other animal. To produce these effects, the cats were fed solely on food that was irradiated at a dose at least five times higher than the maximum allowable dose.

It may seem reasonable to assume that irradiating food might lead to radiation-tolerant strains, similar to the way that strains of bacteria have developed resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria develop a resistance to antibiotics after an individual uses antibiotics repeatedly. Much like pasteurization plants, products that pass through irradiation plants are processed once, and are not processed and reprocessed. Cycles of heat treatment have been shown to produce heat-tolerant bacteria, yet no problems have appeared so far in pasteurization plants. Furthermore, when the irradiation dose is chosen to target a specific species of microbe, it is calibrated to doses several times the value required to target the species. This ensures that the process randomly destroys all members of a target species. Therefore, the more irradiation-tolerant members of the target species are not given any evolutionary advantage. Without evolutionary advantage, selection does not occur. As to the irradiation process directly producing mutations that lead to more virulent, radiation-resistant strains, the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food found that there is no evidence; on the contrary, irradiation has been found to cause loss of virulence and infectivity, as mutants are usually less competitive and less adapted.

Indirect effects of irradiation[edit]

edit

The indirect effects of irradiation are the concerns and benefits of irradiation that are related to how making food irradiation a common process will change the world, with emphasis on the system of food production.

If irradiation was to become common in the food handling process there would be a reduction of the prevalence of foodborne illness and potentially the eradication of specific pathogens. However, multiple studies suggest that an increased rate of pathogen growth may occur when irradiated food is cross-contaminated with a pathogen, as the competing spoilage organisms are no longer present. This being said, cross contamination itself becomes less prevalent with an increase in usage of irradiated foods.

The ability to remove bacterial contamination through post-processing by irradiation may reduce the fear of mishandling food which could cultivate a cavalier attitude toward hygiene and result in contaminants other than bacteria. However, concerns that the pasteurization of milk would lead to increased contamination of milk were prevalent when mandatory pasteurization was introduced, but these fears never materialized after adoption of this law. Therefore, it is unlikely for irradiation to cause an increase of illness due to nonbacteria-based contamination.

Quality Impact on Minimally Processed Vegetables[edit]
edit

Watercress (Nasturtium Officinale) is a rapidly growing aquatic or semi aquatic perennial plant. Because chemical agents do not provide efficient microbial reductions, watercress has been tested with gamma irradiation treatment in order to improve both safety and the shelf life of the product. It is traditionally used on horticultural products to prevent sprouting and post-packaging contamination, delay post-harvest ripening, maturation and senescence.

In a Food Chemistry food journal, scientists studied the suitability of gamma irradiation of 1, 2, and 5 kGy for preserving quality parameters of the fresh cut watercress at around 4 degrees Celsius for 7 days. They determined that a 2 kGy dose of irradiation was the dose that contained most similar qualities to non-stored control samples, which is one of the goals of irradiation. 2 kGy preserved high levels of reducing sugars and favoured PUFA; while samples of the 5 kGy dose revealed high contents of sucrose and MUFA. Both cases the watercress samples obtained healthier fatty acids profiles. However, a 5kGy dose better preserved the antioxidant activity and total flavonoids.

***Remove entire section (irrelevant to topic)

Standards & regulations[edit]

edit

The Codex Alimentarius represents the global standard for irradiation of food, in particular under the WTO-agreement. Member states are free to convert those standards into national regulations at their discretion,[citation needed] therefore regulations about irradiation differ from country to country.

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has passed a motion to commit member states to implement irradiation technology for their national phytosanitary programs; the General assembly of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has urged wider use of the irradiation technology.[citation needed]

Labeling[edit]

edit

The Radura symbol, as required by U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations to show a food has been treated with ionizing radiation. The provisions of the Codex Alimentarius are that any "first generation" product must be labeled "irradiated" as any product derived directly from an irradiated raw material; for ingredients the provision is that even the last molecule of an irradiated ingredient must be listed with the ingredients even in cases where the unirradiated ingredient does not appear on the label. The RADURA-logo is optional; several countries use a graphical version that differs from the Codex-version. The suggested rules for labeling is published at CODEX-STAN – 1 (2005), and includes the usage of the Radura symbol for all products that contain irradiated foods. The Radura symbol is not a designator of quality. The amount of pathogens remaining is based upon dose and the original content and the dose applied can vary on a product by product basis.

The European Union follows the Codex's provision to label irradiated ingredients down to the last molecule of irradiated food. The European Community does not provide for the use of the Radura logo and relies exclusively on labeling by the appropriate phrases in the respective languages of the Member States. The European Union enforces its irradiation labeling laws by requiring its member countries to perform tests on a cross section of food items in the market-place and to report to the European Commission. The results are published annually in the OJ of the European Communities.

The US defines irradiated foods as foods in which the irradiation causes a material change in the food, or a material change in the consequences that may result from the use of the food. Therefore, food that is processed as an ingredient by a restaurant or food processor is exempt from the labeling requirement in the US. All irradiated foods must include a prominent Radura symbol followed in addition to the statement "treated with irradiation" or "treated by irradiation. Bulk foods must be individually labeled with the symbol and statement or, alternatively, the Radura and statement should be located next to the sale container.

Organic advocacy groups believe that irradiated food should not be labeled as raw because they believe the process changes the nutritional content of food. However, the degradation of vitamins caused by irradiation is similar to or even less than the loss caused by other raw food preservation processes. Other processes like chilling, freezing, drying, and heating also result in some vitamin loss.

Food safety[edit]

edit

In 2003, the Codex Alimentarius removed any upper dose limit for food irradiation as well as clearances for specific foods, declaring that all are safe to irradiate. Countries such as Pakistan and Brazil have adopted the Codex without any reservation or restriction. Other countries, including New Zealand, Australia, Thailand, India, and Mexico, have permitted the irradiation of fresh fruits for fruit fly quarantine purposes, amongst others.[citation needed]

Standards that describe calibration and operation for radiation dosimetry, as well as procedures to relate the measured dose to the effects achieved and to report and document such results, are maintained by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM international) and are also available as ISO/ASTM standards.

All of the rules involved in processing food are applied to all foods before they are irradiated.

United States[edit]

edit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the agency responsible for regulation of radiation sources in the United States. Irradiation, as defined by the FDA is a "food additive" as opposed to a food process and therefore falls under the food additive regulations. Each food approved for irradiation has specific guidelines in terms of minimum and maximum dosage as deterred safe by the FDA. Packaging materials containing the food processed by irradiation must also undergo approval. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) amends these rules for use with meat, poultry, and fresh fruit.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has approved the use of low-level irradiation as an alternative treatment to pesticides for fruits and vegetables that are considered hosts to a number of insect pests, including fruit flies and seed weevils. Under bilateral agreements that allows less-developed countries to earn income through food exports agreements are made to allow them to irradiate fruits and vegetables at low doses to kill insects, so that the food can avoid quarantine.

European Union[edit]

edit

European law dictates that all member countries must allow the sale of irradiated dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings. However, these Directives allow Member States to maintain previous clearances food categories the EC's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) had previously approved (the approval body is now the European Food Safety Authority). Presently, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom allow the sale of many different types of irradiated foods. Before individual items in an approved class can be added to the approved list, studies into the toxicology of each of such food and for each of the proposed dose ranges are requested. It also states that irradiation shall not be used "as a substitute for hygiene or health practices or good manufacturing or agricultural practice". These Directives only control food irradiation for food retail and their conditions and controls are not applicable to the irradiation of food for patients requiring sterile diets.

Because of the Single Market of the EC any food, even if irradiated, must be allowed to be marketed in any other Member State even if a general ban of food irradiation prevails, under the condition that the food has been irradiated legally in the state of origin. Furthermore, imports into the EC are possible from third countries if the irradiation facility had been inspected and approved by the EC and the treatment is legal within the EC or some Member state.

Australia[edit]

edit

Australia banned irradiated cat food after a national scare where cats suffered from paralyzation after eating a specific brand of highly irradiated catfood for an extended period of time. The suspected culprit was malnutrition from consuming food depleted of Vitamin A by the irradiation process. The incident was linked only to a single batch of one brand's product and no illness was linked to any of that brand's other irradiated batches of the same product or to any other brand of irradiated cat food. This, along with incomplete evidence indicating that the cat food was not sufficiently depleted of Vitamin A makes irradiation a less likely cause. Further research has been able to experimentally induce the paralyzation of cats by via Vitamin A deficiency by feeding highly irradiated food. For more details see the Long term impacts section.

Nuclear safety and security[edit]

edit

Interlocks and safeguards are mandated to minimize this risk. There have been radiation-related accidents, deaths, and injury at such facilities, many of them caused by operators overriding the safety related interlocks.In a radiation processing facility, radiation specific concerns are supervised by special authorities, while "Ordinary" occupational safety regulations are handled much like other businesses.

The safety of irradiation facilities is regulated by the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and monitored by the different national Nuclear Regulatory Commissions. The regulators enforce a safety culture that mandates that all incidents that occur are documented and thoroughly analyzed to determine the cause and improvement potential. Such incidents are studied by personnel at multiple facilities, and improvements are mandated to retrofit existing facilities and future design.

In the US the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the safety of the processing facility, and the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the safe transport of the radioactive sources.

Irradiated food supply[edit]

edit

Food irradiation is permitted by over 60 countries, with about 500,000 metric tons of food annually processed worldwide. The regulations that dictate how food is to be irradiated, as well as the food allowed to be irradiated, vary greatly from country to country. In Austria, Germany, and many other countries of the European Union only dried herbs, spices, and seasonings can be processed with irradiation and only at a specific dose, while in Brazil all foods are allowed at any dose.

As of 2010, the quantities of foods irradiated in Asia, the EU and the US were 285,200, 9,300, and 103,000 tons. Authorities in some countries use tests that can detect the irradiation of food items to enforce labeling standards and to bolster consumer confidence. The European Union monitors the market to determine the quantity of irradiated foods, if irradiated foods are labeled as irradiated, and if the irradiation is performed at approved facilities.

Irradiation of fruits and vegetables to prevent the spread of pest and diseases across borders has been increasing globally. In 2010, 18,446 tonnes of fruits and vegetables were irradiated in six countries for export quarantine control. 97% of this was exported to the United States.

In total, 103 000 tonnes of food products were irradiated on mainland United States in 2010. The three types of foods irradiated the most were spices (77.7%), fruits and vegetables (14.6%) and meat and poultry (7.77%). 17 953 tonnes of irradiated fruits and vegetables were exported to the mainland United States. Mexico, the United States' state of Hawaii, Thailand, Vietnam and India export irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.Mexico, followed by the United States' state of Hawaii, is the largest exporter of irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.

In total, 6 876 tonnes of food products were irradiated in European Union countries in 2013; mainly in four member state countries: Belgium (49.4%), the Netherlands (24.4%), Spain (12.7%) and France (10.0%). The two types of foods irradiated the most were frog legs (46%), and dried herbs and spices (25%). There has been a decrease of 14% in the total quantity of products irradiated in the EU compared to the previous year 2012 (7 972 tonnes).

There has been low level gamma irradiation that has been attempted on arugula, spinach, cauliflower, ash gourd, bamboo shoots, coriander, parsley, and watercress. There has been limited information, however, regarding the physical, chemical and/or bioactive properties and the shelf life on these minimally processed vegetables.

United States[edit]

edit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have approved irradiation of the following foods and purposes:

  • Packaged refrigerated or frozen red meat — to control pathogens (E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella) and to extend shelf life.
  • Packaged poultry — control pathogens (Salmonella and Camplylobacter).
  • Fresh fruits, vegetables, and grains — to control insects and inhibit growth, ripening and sprouting.
  • Pork — to control trichinosis.
  • Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings — to control insects and microorganisms.
  • Dry or dehydrated enzyme preparations — to control insects and microorganisms.
  • White potatoes — to inhibit sprout development.
  • Wheat and wheat flour — to control insects.
  • Loose or bagged fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach
  • Crustaceans (lobster, shrimp, and crab)
  • Shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops)

UK

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) allows irradiation on the following general food categories (and maximum dosage allowed):[5]

  • Fruit (2 kGy)
  • Vegetables (1 kGy)
  • Cereals (1kGy)
  • Bulbs and tubers (0.2 kGy)
  • Dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings (10 kGy)
  • Fish and shellfish (3 kGy)
  • Poultry (7 kGy)

https://www.food.gov.uk/science/irradfoodqa

Canada

With the exception of the foods listed below, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency does not allow irradiation of food in Canada:[6]

China

National standards for food irradiation (and maximum dosage allowed) in China are the following:[7]

EU

The European Commission has approved the use of food irradiation in the following products:[8]

Public perception[edit] **section merged with "Misconceptions" sections throughout article

edit

A major concern is that irradiation might cause chemical changes that are harmful to the consumer. Several national expert groups and two international expert groups evaluated the available data and concluded that any food at any dose is wholesome and safe to consume as long as it remains palatable and maintains its technical properties (e.g. feel, texture, or color). While irradiation can cause many products, it is important to remember that the low concentrations are not a health concern whatsoever. Consensus among scientific studies is that irradiation does not cause cancer.[2]

Irradiated food does not become radioactive, just as an object exposed to light does not start producing light. Radioactivity is the ability of a substance to emit high energy particles. When particles hit the target materials they may free other highly energetic particles. This ends shortly after the end of the exposure, much like objects stop reflecting light when the source is turned off and warm objects emit heat until they cool down but do not continue to produce their own heat. To modify a material so that it keeps emitting radiation (induce radiation) the atomic cores (nucleus) of the atoms in the target material must be modified. By only affecting the outermost electrons, foods treated with irradiation are not radioactive as irradiation does not provide enough energy to destabilize the nuclei of the food matrix. Irradiated foods absorb the processing energy and as a result, atoms get ionized, which is non-toxic. The energy used destroy bacteria but does not pose significant changes to the food itself.[2] Additionally, there is no evidence to conclude that the free radicals produced by irradiation of food alter the safety of food products.

Irradiation has been approved by many countries. For example, in the U.S. the FDA has approved food irradiation for over fifty years. However, in the past decade the major growth area is for fruits and vegetables that are irradiated to prevent the spread of pests. In the early 2000s in the US, irradiated meat was common at some grocery stores, but because of lack of consumer demand, it is no longer common. Because consumer demand for irradiated food is low, reducing the spoilage between manufacture and consumer purchase and reducing the risk of food borne illness is currently not sufficient incentive for most manufactures to supplement their process with irradiation. Nevertheless, food irradiation does take place commercially and volumes are in general increasing at a slow rate, even in the European Union where all member countries allow the irradiation of dried herbs spices and vegetable seasonings but only a few allow other foods to be sold as irradiated.

Although there are some consumers who choose not to purchase irradiated food, a sufficient market has existed for retailers to have continuously stocked irradiated products for years. When labeled irradiated food is offered for retail sale, these consumers buy and re-purchase it, indicating that it is possible to successfully market irradiated foods; therefore retailers not stocking irradiated foods might be a major bottleneck to the wider adoption of irradiated foods. It is however, widely believed that consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation is more negative than those processed by other means and some industry studies indicate the number of consumers concerned about the safety of irradiated food decreased between 1985 and 1995 to levels comparable to those of people concerned about food additives and preservatives. Even though is it is untrue "People think the product is radioactive," said Harlan Clemmons, president of Sadex, a food irradiation company based in Sioux City, Iowa. Because of these concerns and the increased cost of irradiated foods, there is not a widespread public demand for the irradiation of foods for human consumption. Irradiated food does not become radioactive.

Timeline of the history of food irradiation[edit]

edit
  • 1895 Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovers X-rays ("bremsstrahlung", from German for radiation produced by deceleration)
  • 1896 Antoine Henri Becquerel discovers natural radioactivity; Minck proposes the therapeutic use
  • 1904 Samuel Prescott describes the bactericide effects Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
  • 1906 Appleby & Banks: UK patent to use radioactive isotopes to irradiate particulate food in a flowing bed
  • 1918 Gillett: U.S. Patent to use X-rays for the preservation of food
  • 1921 Schwartz describes the elimination of Trichinella from food
  • 1930 Wuest: French patent on food irradiation
  • 1943 MIT becomes active in the field of food preservation for the U.S. Army
  • 1951 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission begins to co-ordinate national research activities
  • 1958 World first commercial food irradiation (spices) at Stuttgart, Germany
  • 1970 Establishment of the International Food Irradiation Project (IFIP), headquarters at the Federal Research Centre for Food Preservation, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 1980 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Irradiation recommends the clearance generally up to 10 kGy "overall average dose"
  • 1981/1983 End of IFIP after reaching its goals
  • 1983 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: any food at a maximum "overall average dose" of 10 kGy
  • 1984 International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) becomes the successor of IFIP
  • 1998 The European Union's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) voted "positive" on eight categories of irradiation applications
  • 1997 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Study Group on High-Dose Irradiation recommends to lift any upper dose limit
  • 1999 The European Union issues Directives 1999/2/EC (framework Directive) and 1999/3/EC (implementing Directive) limiting irradiation a positive list whose sole content is one of the eight categories approved by the SFC, but allowing the individual states to give clearances for any food previously approved by the SFC.
  • 2000 Germany leads a veto on a measure to provide a final draft for the positive list.
  • 2003 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: no longer any upper dose limit
  • 2003 The SCF adopts a "revised opinion" that recommends against the cancellation of the upper dose limit.
  • 2004 ICGFI ends
  • 2011 The successor to the SFC, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), reexamines the SFC's list and makes further recommendations for inclusion.

See also[edit]

edit

Notes[edit]

edit
  1. ^ Jump up to: a b c fresh or frozen red meat, poultry, and seafood
  2. Jump up ^ improve hygienic quality
  3. Jump up ^ shelf stable without refrigeration
    1. ***Remove all notes

https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/IrradiatedFoodPackaging/ucm081050.htm

Despite its limited use in the past, use of food irradiation is increasing as consumers are beginning to appreciate the benefits of irradiated food.

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practices.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Food Irradiation A Guide for Consumers, Policymakers and the Media" (PDF).
  3. ^ Prakash, A.; Guner, A.R.; Caporaso, F.; Foley, D.M. (2000-04-01). "Effects of Low-dose Gamma Irradiation on the Shelf Life and Quality Characteristics of Cut Romaine Lettuce Packaged under Modified Atmosphere". Journal of Food Science. 65 (3): 549–553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16046.x. ISSN 1750-3841.
  4. ^ Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Chemical Contaminants - Exploratory Data on Furan in Food: Individual Food Products". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
  5. ^ Agency, Food Standards. "Irradiated food | Food Standards Agency". www.food.gov.uk. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
  6. ^ Directorate, Government of Canada,Canadian Food Inspection Agency,Food Labelling and Claims. "Irradiated Foods". www.inspection.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Chen, Hao (2013). "Food Irradiation in China" (PDF).
  8. ^ "Legislation - Food Safety - European Commission". Food Safety. Retrieved 2018-04-20.

Review/Feedback on Pasteurization Group (Arianna's Sandbox)

Lead Section

Introductory sentence - good (topic of article stated, though not concise/direct). The introductory sentence is very vague and difficult to understand due to the wording of it. By splitting up packaged and non-packaged foods as two different categories, I can sense some confusion by non-food science readers. Also, be more detailed in regards to what pathogens are commonly reduced and how shelf-life is extended. The first sentence is very important and can be take as a hook for readers - need to provide them with much detail from the beginning.  

Summary - poor (missing/lacking key ideas). Review class notes, assigned readings, and articles on pasteurization to provide key ideas that we have learned regarding pasteurization.

Context - fair (includes only 1-2 additional sentences of information, yet doesn't provide enough information to determine what the article is about). Good starting history, but needs elaboration (too vague).

Lead section overall is vague and could use more pertinent information. Also, there are many pronouns (it, this, these, etc.) that can be elaborated upon. Lastly, in my opinion, the lead section is written as if the readers knew what we have learned throughout the semester as opposed to a lay audience.

Organization - fair (confusing organization and article does not flow between sections). Article should flow nicely from start to finish. There are sections that are started in the history and finished in the effects (milk). Group all pertinent ideas together and try not to skip around on subjects/food products. The history section of milk and alcoholic beverages is too in depth and distracting as it focuses on the history in the 1700's/1900's. Instead, a quick history of pasteurization should be incorporated and the article should focus on the principles of pasteurization. Possibly, include tables or diagrams explaining the process and common equipment of pasteurization and common parameters on multiple food products (not just milk and juice). We spent about two weeks learning about pasteurization and heat exchangers so look back at notes and improve/broaden that section. Definitely add more details regarding the effects of pasteurized foods.

Content - fair (covers some of the assigned topic area). See above comments on organization. Are sections of "Novel pasteurization" and "low moisture foods" pertinent to pasteurization? If so, I would change the section names as both can be associated with different articles. Instead of the linking products that are commonly pasteurized, elaborate on them and their common parameters and reasons for pasteurization. Make sure all the links in the "See also" section are relevant to pasteurization and are not just random food science terms.

Balance - excellent (article presents balanced coverage without favoring one side unduly). Good, neutral draft. As pasteurization is widely accepted, I cannot imagine negative articles on the subject, but group does a good job on not presenting the information as positive.

Tone - good (becomes informal or chatty in places). Check the tone throughout the draft. Remember, that the article should flow and the reader should not be able to differentiate between authors, which is currently the case. Also, as authors, let the writing reflect that we have a higher education and greater subject knowledge after taking this course.

Citations - fair (a few unsourced paragraphs or sections). Read carefully through your entire article to ensure that all ideas/information have been properly cited, even if they are paraphrased. Also, some sentences/paragraphs have unclear sourcing; again, thoroughly double check the article.

Sources - good (Article uses mostly good sources, but includes some lower-quality sources). The class book is a good start, but be sure to incorporate sources such as government websites (FDA/USDA) and books/sources from the library. LL has good resources, books are located on the third floor - take a look at what they have in terms of pasteurization.Try to stay away from journal articles as they may have a positive/negative tone towards the subject matter.

Completeness - fair (Most references are fairly complete, but some are missing something). Take a look at your references - should be a quick fix, there are two or three references that need to be updated. All others (including the few that I checked) are good to go.

New sections -

Re-organizing -

Gaps -

Smaller additions -

Coverage -

Article body -

Food Irradiation

edit

Food irradiation is the process of exposing food and food packaging to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays, x-rays or electron beams, is energy that can be transmitted without direct contact to the source of the energy (radiation) capable of freeing electrons from their atomic bonds (ionization) in the targeted food.[1][2] Radiation can be emitted by a radioactive substance or generated electrically. This treatment is used to improve food safety by extending product shelf-life (preservation), reducing the risk of foodborne illness, delaying sprouting or ripening in fresh produce, sterilization of military foods, and as a means of controlling insects and invasive pests.[3] Food irradiation primarily extends the shelf-life of irradiated foods by effectively destroying pathogenic and spoilage organisms and inhibiting sprouting.[3] It does not involve significant heat treatment and thus maintains the sensory and nutritional aspects of the food.[4] Although consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation have been negative when compared with those processed by other means, all independent research, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) are among the organizations that have confirmed irradiation to be safe. [5][6][7][8][3][9][10][11][12][13]

Irradiation is also used for non-food applications, such as sterilization of medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics.[4]

Uses

edit

Irradiation is used to reduce or eliminate the risk of food-borne illnesses, prevent or slow down spoilage, delay germination or sprouting and as a treatment against foodborne insects and pests. Depending on the dose, some or all the pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, viruses and pests present are destroyed, slowed down, or rendered incapable of reproduction.[14] At the doses (1-10 kGy) used, irradiation does not sterilize the food but pasteurizes it and hence irradiated food requires refrigeration.  

Irradiation reduces postharvest losses by slowing down the rate of ripening. It inhibits spoilage microorganisms thus retarding spoilage of food. When used in low doses (0.06-0.2 kGy)[15], it prevents sprouting in fresh produce such as potatoes, onions, and garlic.

It is also used for the inactivation and control of parasites in meat and meat products. It is used to extend the shelf life of seafood, raw fresh fish, fruits, and vegetable and can be used as an alternative method of treatment for the decontamination of spices, herbs, and dry seasonings.

Phytosanitary irradiation, which is the use of ionizing radiation to prevent the spread of invasive insect pests by trade in fresh produce across national and international borders, is a growing field in food irradiation. These insects if allowed to enter new habitats, could establish themselves as pests in the normal environment and would be difficult to get rid of and cause significant damage to the agricultural production[16].

High doses of irradiation (greater than 10 kGy) are used by NASA to sterilize food intended for space flight programs (44 kGy)[17] and hospitals to sterilize foods in order to accomodate the diets of immunocompromised patients[18]. Irradiation can also be used to sterilize food packaging material[17].

Irradiation cannot revert spoiled or over ripened food to a fresh state. If this food was processed by irradiation, further spoilage would cease and ripening would slow down, yet the irradiation would not destroy the toxins or repair the texture, color, or taste of the food.[19] When targeting bacteria, most foods are irradiated to significantly reduce the number of active microbes, not to sterilize all microbes in the product. In this respect it is similar to pasteurization.

Irradiation is used to create safe foods for people at high risk of infection, or for conditions where food must be stored for long periods of time and proper storage conditions are not available. Foods that can tolerate irradiation at sufficient doses are treated to ensure that the product is completely sterilized. This is most commonly done with rations for astronauts, and special diets for hospital patients.

Irradiation is used to create shelf-stable products. Since irradiation reduces the populations of spoilage microorganisms, and because pre-packed food can be irradiated, the packaging prevents recontamination into the final product.[1]

Irradiation is used to reduce post-harvest losses. It reduces populations of spoilage micro-organisms in the food and can slow down the speed at which enzymes change the food, and therefore slows spoilage and ripening, and inhibits sprouting (e.g., of potato, onion, and garlic).[20]

Food is also irradiated to prevent the spread of invasive pest species through trade in fresh vegetables and fruits, either within countries, or trade across international boundaries. Pests such as insects could be transported to new habitats through trade in fresh produce which could significantly affect agricultural production and the environment were they to establish themselves. This "phytosanitary irradiation"[21] aims to render any hitch-hiking pest incapable of breeding. The pests are sterilized when the food is treated by low doses of irradiation. In general, the higher doses required to destroy pests such as insects, mealybugs, mites, moths, and butterflies either affect the look or taste, or cannot be tolerated by fresh produce.[22] Low dosage treatments (less than 1000 gray) enables trade across quarantine boundaries[23] and may also help reduce spoilage.

Impact

edit

Irradiation reduces the risk of infection and spoilage, does not make food radioactive, and the food is shown to be safe, but it does cause chemical reactions that alter the food and therefore alters the chemical makeup, nutritional content, and the sensory qualities of the food.[24] Some of the potential secondary impacts of irradiation are hypothetical, while others are demonstrated. These effects include cumulative impacts to pathogens, people, and the environment due to the reduction of food quality, the transportation and storage of radioactive goods, and destruction of pathogens, changes in the way we relate to food and how irradiation changes the food production and shipping industries.

Immediate effects

edit

The radiation source supplies energetic particles or waves. As these waves/particles pass through a target material they collide with other particles. Around the sites of these collisions chemical bonds are broken, creating short lived radicals (e.g. the hydroxyl radical, the hydrogen atom and solvated electrons). These radicals cause further chemical changes by bonding with and or stripping particles from nearby molecules. When collisions damage DNA or RNA, effective reproduction becomes unlikely, also when collisions occur in cells, cell division is often suppressed.[1]

Irradiation (within the accepted energy limits, as 10 MeV for electrons, 5 MeV for X-rays [US 7.5 MeV] and gamma rays from Cobalt-60) can not make food radioactive, but it does produce radiolytic products, and free radicals in the food. A few of these products are unique, but not considered dangerous.[25]

Irradiation can also alter the nutritional content and flavor of foods, much like cooking.[25] The scale of these chemical changes is not unique. Cooking, smoking, salting, and other less novel techniques, cause the food to be altered so drastically that its original nature is almost unrecognizable, and must be called by a different name. Storage of food also causes dramatic chemical changes, ones that eventually lead to deterioration and spoilage.[26]

Misconceptions

edit

A major concern is that irradiation might cause chemical changes that are harmful to the consumer. Several national expert groups and two international expert groups evaluated the available data and concluded that any food at any dose is wholesome and safe to consume as long as it remains palatable and maintains its technical properties (e.g. feel, texture, or color).[10][11]

Irradiated food does not become radioactive, just as an object exposed to light does not start producing light. Radioactivity is the ability of a substance to emit high energy particles. When particles hit the target materials they may free other highly energetic particles. This ends shortly after the end of the exposure, much like objects stop reflecting light when the source is turned off and warm objects emit heat until they cool down but do not continue to produce their own heat. To modify a material so that it keeps emitting radiation (induce radiation) the atomic cores (nucleus) of the atoms in the target material must be modified.

It is impossible for food irradiators to induce radiation in a product. Irradiators emit electrons or photons and the radiation is intrinsically radiated at precisely known strengths (wavelengths for photons, and speeds for electrons). These radiated particles at these strengths can never be strong enough to modify the nucleus of the targeted atom in the food, regardless of how many particles hit the target material, and radioactivity can not be induced without modifying the nucleus.[25]

Chemical changes

edit

Compounds known as free radicals form when food is irradiated. Most of these are oxidizers (i.e., accept electrons) and some react very strongly. According to the free-radical theory of aging excessive amounts of these free radicals can lead to cell injury and cell death, which may contribute to many diseases.[27] However, this generally relates to the free radicals generated in the body, not the free radicals consumed by the individual, as much of these are destroyed in the digestive process.

Further information: Free-radical theory of aging and Oxidative stress

When fatty acids are irradiated, a family of compounds called 2-alkylcyclobutanones (2-ACBs) are produced. These are thought to be unique radiolytic products. Most of the substances found in irradiated food are also found in food that has been subjected to other food processing treatments, and are therefore not unique. One family of chemicals (2ACB's) are uniquely formed by irradiation (unique radiolytic products), and this product is nontoxic. When irradiating food, all other chemicals occur in a lower or comparable frequency to other food processing techniques.[10][11][28][29] Furthermore, the quantities in which they occur in irradiated food are lower or similar to the quantities formed in heat treatments.[10][11][28][29]

The radiation doses to cause toxic changes are much higher than the doses used to during irradiation, and taking into account the presence of 2-ACBs along with what is known of free radicals, these results lead to the conclusion that there is no significant risk from radiolytic products.[9]

Food quality

edit

Ionizing radiation can change food quality but in general very high levels of radiation treatment (many thousands of gray) are necessary to adversely change nutritional content, as well as the sensory qualities (taste, appearance, and texture). Irradiation to the doses used commercially to treat food have very little negative impact on the sensory qualities and nutrient content in foods. When irradiation is used to maintain food quality for a longer period of time (improve the shelf stability of some sensory qualities and nutrients) the improvement means that more consumers have access to the original taste, texture, appearance, and nutrients.[30][31][32] The changes in quality and nutrition depend on the degree of treatment and may vary greatly from food to food.[20]

There has been low level gamma irradiation that has been attempted on arugula,[33] spinach,[34] cauliflower,[35] ash gourd,[36] bamboo shoots,[37] coriander, parsley, and watercress.[38] There has been limited information, however, regarding the physical, chemical and/or bioactive properties and the shelf life on these minimally processed vegetables.[32]

There is some degradation of vitamins caused by irradiation, but is similar to or even less than the loss caused by other processes that achieve the same result. Other processes like chilling, freezing, drying, and heating also result in some vitamin loss.[20]

The changes in the flavor of fatty foods like meats, nuts and oils are sometimes noticeable, while the changes in lean products like fruits and vegetables are less so. Some studies by the irradiation industry show that for some properly treated fruits and vegetables irradiation is seen by consumers to improve the sensory qualities of the product compared to untreated fruits and vegetables.[20]

Quality Impact on Minimally Processed Vegetables
edit

Watercress (Nasturtium Officinale) is a rapidly growing aquatic or semi aquatic perennial plant. Because chemical agents do not provide efficient microbial reductions, watercress has been tested with gamma irradiation treatment in order to improve both safety and the shelf life of the product.[39] It is traditionally used on horticultural products to prevent sprouting and post-packaging contamination, delay post-harvest ripening, maturation and senescence.[32]

In a Food Chemistry food journal, scientists studied the suitability of gamma irradiation of 1, 2, and 5 kGy for preserving quality parameters of the fresh cut watercress at around 4 degrees Celsius for 7 days. They determined that a 2 kGy dose of irradiation was the dose that contained most similar qualities to non-stored control samples, which is one of the goals of irradiation.[30] 2 kGy preserved high levels of reducing sugars and favoured PUFA; while samples of the 5 kGy dose revealed high contents of sucrose and MUFA. Both cases the watercress samples obtained healthier fatty acids profiles.[31] However, a 5kGy dose better preserved the antioxidant activity and total flavonoids.[32]

Long-term impacts

edit

If the majority of food was irradiated at high-enough levels to significantly decrease its nutritional content, there would be an increased risk of developing nutritionally-based illnesses if additional steps, such as changes in eating habits, were not taken to mitigate this.[40] Furthermore, for at least three studies on cats, the consumption of irradiated food was associated with a loss of tissue in the myelin sheath, leading to reversible paralysis. Researchers suspect that reduced levels of vitamin A and high levels of free radicals may be the cause.[41] This effect is thought to be specific to cats and has not been reproduced in any other animal. To produce these effects, the cats were fed solely on food that was irradiated at a dose at least five times higher than the maximum allowable dose.[41]

It may seem reasonable to assume that irradiating food might lead to radiation-tolerant strains, similar to the way that strains of bacteria have developed resistance to antibiotics. Bacteria develop a resistance to antibiotics after an individual uses antibiotics repeatedly. Much like pasteurization plants, products that pass through irradiation plants are processed once, and are not processed and reprocessed. Cycles of heat treatment have been shown to produce heat-tolerant bacteria, yet no problems have appeared so far in pasteurization plants. Furthermore, when the irradiation dose is chosen to target a specific species of microbe, it is calibrated to doses several times the value required to target the species. This ensures that the process randomly destroys all members of a target species.[42] Therefore, the more irradiation-tolerant members of the target species are not given any evolutionary advantage. Without evolutionary advantage, selection does not occur. As to the irradiation process directly producing mutations that lead to more virulent, radiation-resistant strains, the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food found that there is no evidence; on the contrary, irradiation has been found to cause loss of virulence and infectivity, as mutants are usually less competitive and less adapted.[43]

Misconceptions

edit

Some who advocate against food irradiation argue the safety of irradiated food is not scientifically proven because there are a lack of long-term studies [44][45] in spite of the fact that hundreds of animal feeding studies of irradiated food, including multigenerational studies, have been performed since 1950.[9] Endpoints investigated have included subchronic and chronic changes in metabolism, histopathology, function of most systems, reproductive effects, growth, teratogenicity, and mutagenicity. A large number of studies have been performed; meta-studies have supported the safety of irradiated food.[9][10][11][12][13]

The below experiments are cited by food irradiation opponents, but either could not be verified in later experiments, could not be clearly attributed to the radiation effect, or could be attributed to an inappropriate design of the experiment.[9][20]

  • India's National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) found an elevated rate of cells with more than one set of genes (polyploidy) in humans and animals when fed wheat that was irradiated recently (within 12 weeks). Upon analysis, scientists determined that the techniques used by the NIN allowed for too much human error and statistical variation; therefore, the results were unreliable. After multiple studies by independent agencies and scientists, no correlation between polyploidy and irradiation of food could be found.[20]

Indirect effects of irradiation

edit

The indirect effects of irradiation are the concerns and benefits of irradiation that are related to how making food irradiation a common process will change the world, with emphasis on the system of food production.

If irradiation was to become common in the food handling process there would be a reduction of the prevalence of foodborne illness and potentially the eradication of specific pathogens.[46] However, multiple studies suggest that an increased rate of pathogen growth may occur when irradiated food is cross-contaminated with a pathogen, as the competing spoilage organisms are no longer present.[47] This being said, cross contamination itself becomes less prevalent with an increase in usage of irradiated foods.[48]

The ability to remove bacterial contamination through post-processing by irradiation may reduce the fear of mishandling food which could cultivate a cavalier attitude toward hygiene and result in contaminants other than bacteria. However, concerns that the pasteurization of milk would lead to increased contamination of milk were prevalent when mandatory pasteurization was introduced, but these fears never materialized after adoption of this law. Therefore, it is unlikely for irradiation to cause an increase of illness due to nonbacteria-based contamination.[49]

Treatment

edit

Up to the point where the food is processed by irradiation, the food is processed in the same way as all other food. To treat the food, they are exposed to a radioactive source, for a set period of time to achieve a desired dose. Radiation may be emitted by a radioactive substance, or by X-ray and electron beam accelerators. Special precautions are taken to ensure the food stuffs never come in contact with the radioactive substances and that the personnel and the environment are protected from exposure radiation.[50] Irradiation treatments are typically classified by dose (high, medium, and low), but are sometimes classified by the effects of the treatment[51] (radappertization, radicidation and radurization). Food irradiation is sometimes referred to as "cold pasteurization"[52] or "electronic pasteurization"[53] because ionizing the food does not heat the food to high temperatures during the process, and the effect is similar to heat pasteurization. The term "cold pasteurization" is controversial because the term may be used to disguise the fact the food has been irradiated and pasteurization and irradiation are fundamentally different processes.

Treatment costs vary as a function of dose and facility usage. A pallet or tote is typically exposed for several minutes to hours depending on dose. Low-dose applications such as disinfestation of fruit range between US$0.01/lbs and US$0.08/lbs while higher-dose applications can cost as much as US$0.20/lbs.[54]

Process

edit

Typically, when the food is being irradiated, pallets of food are exposed to a source of radiation for a specific time. Dosimeters are placed on the pallet (at various locations) of food to serve as a check and ensure that the correct dose was achieved.[50] Most irradiated food is processed by gamma irradiation.,[55] however the usage of electron beam and X-ray is becoming more popular as well [1]. With gamma irradiation, special precautions are taken because gamma rays are continuously emitted by the radioactive material. In most designs, to nullify the effects of radiation, the radioisotope is lowered into a water-filled storage pool, which absorbs the radiation but does not become radioactive. This allows pallets of the products to be added and removed from the irradiation chamber and other maintenance to be done.[50] Sometimes movable shields are used to reduce radiation levels in areas of the irradiation chamber instead of submerging the source.[citation needed] For x-ray and electron irradiation these precautions are not necessary as the radiation is generated by electricity, the source of the radiation can be switched off.[50]

For x-ray, gamma ray and electron irradiation, shielding is required when the foods are being irradiated. This is done to protect workers and the environment outside of the chamber from radiation exposure. Typically permanent or movable shields are used.[50] In some gamma irradiators the radioactive source is under water at all times, and the hermetically sealed product is lowered into the water. The water acts as the shield in this application.[citation needed] Because of the lower penetration depth of electron irradiation, treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes is not possible.[citation needed]

Dosimetry

edit

The radiation absorbed dose is the amount energy absorbed per unit weight of the target material. Dose is used because, when the same substance is given the same dose, similar changes are observed in the target material. The SI unit for dose is grays (Gy or J/kg). Dosimeters are used to measure dose, and are small components that, when exposed to ionizing radiation, change measurable physical attributes to a degree that can be correlated to the dose received. Measuring dose (dosimetry) involves exposing one or more dosimeters along with the target material.[56][57]

For purposes of legislation doses are divided into low (up to 1 kGy), medium (1 kGy to 10 kGy), and high-dose applications (above 10 kGy).[citation needed] High-dose applications are above those currently permitted in the US for commercial food items by the FDA and other regulators around the world.[58] Though these doses are approved for non commercial applications, such as sterilizing frozen meat for NASA astronauts (doses of 44 kGy)[59] and food for hospital patients.

Applications By Overall Average Dose
Application Dose (kGy)
Low dose (up to 1 kGy) Inhibit sprouting of bulbs and tubers 0.03–0.15 kGy
Delay fruit ripening 0.03–0.15 kGy
Stop insect/parasite infestations to help clear quarantine 0.07–1.00 kGy
Medium dose (1 kGy to 10 kGy) Delay spoilage of meat[a] 1.50–3.00 kGy
Reduce risk of pathogens in meat[a] 3.00–7.00 kGy
Increase sanitation[b] of spices[60] 10.00 kGy
High dose (above 10 kGy) Sterilization[c] of packaged meat[a] 25.00–70.00 kGy
Increase juice yield[citation needed]
Improve re-hydration[citation needed]

Technology

edit
 
Efficiency illustration of the different radiation technologies (electron beam, X-ray, gamma rays)
See also: Electron beam processing

Electron irradiation uses a stream of electrons accelerated by an electric voltage or radio frequency wave to a velocity close to the speed of light. Electrons have mass and negative electric charge, and therefore electron beams at the energies allowed for food irradiation do not penetrate into the product beyond several centimeters, depending on product density. Therefore, electron beams are preferred for thin products

Gamma irradiation involves packets of light (photons) that originate from radioactive decay of atomic nuclei. Gamma rays are used for products that are too thick for treatment with electron beams. Every radioactive element gives rise to Gamma rays with specific energies characteristic of the source element, these rays have zero mass and no electrical charge. The ones used for food irradiation are able to penetrate through food products. The radioactive isotope radioisotope cobalt-60 is used as the source in all commercial scale gamma irradiation facilities.[55] Gamma irradiation is most widely used technology because the deeper penetration of the gamma rays enables administering treatment to entire industrial pallets or totes (reducing the need for material handling) and it is significantly less expensive than using an X-ray source. Cobalt-60 is bred from cobalt-59 using neutron irradiation in specifically designed nuclear reactors.[55] In limited applications caesium-137, a less costly alternative recovered during the processing of spent nuclear fuel, is used as a radioactive source. Insufficient quantities are available for large scale commercial use. An incident where water-soluble caesium-137 leaked into the source storage pool requiring NRC intervention[61] has led to near elimination of this radioisotope.

Irradiation by X-ray is similar to irradiation by gamma rays but the rays produced have a distribution of energetic packets of light, still the maximum energy of the produced X-ray photon is limited by the energy put into the X-ray generator therefore it is possible to guarantee that no partials capable of inducing irradiation can be emitted. X-rays are generated by colliding accelerated electrons with a dense target material (this process is known as bremsstrahlung-conversion), and the X-rays so produced have a spectrum characteristic of the dense target material. Heavy metals, such as tantalum and tungsten, are used because of their high atomic numbers and high melting temperatures. Tantalum is usually preferred versus tungsten for industrial, large-area, high-power targets because it is more workable than tungsten and has a higher threshold energy for induced reactions.[62] Like electron beams, X-rays do not necessitate the use of radioactive materials and can be switched off when not needed.[63] X-rays ability to penetrate the target is similar to gamma irradiation. X-ray machines produce better dose uniformity than Gamma rays, and their penetration depth is similar to slightly greater than that of gamma rays, but they require much more electricity as only as much as 12% of the input energy is converted into X-rays.[55]

Cost

edit

The cost of food irradiation is influenced by dose requirements, the food's tolerance of radiation, handling conditions, i.e., packaging and stacking requirements, construction costs, financing arrangements, and other variables particular to the situation.[64] Irradiation is a capital-intensive technology requiring a substantial initial investment, ranging from $1 million to $5 million. In the case of large research or contract irradiation facilities, major capital costs include a radiation source, hardware (irradiator, totes and conveyors, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment), land (1 to 1.5 acres), radiation shield, and warehouse. Operating costs include salaries (for fixed and variable labor), utilities, maintenance, taxes/insurance, cobalt-60 replenishment, general utilities, and miscellaneous operating costs.[54][65] Perishable food items, like fruits, vegetables and meats would still require to be handled in the cold chain, so all other supply chain costs remain the same.

Public perception

edit

Irradiation has been approved by many countries. For example, in the U.S. the FDA has approved food irradiation for over fifty years. However, in the past decade the major growth area is for fruits and vegetables that are irradiated to prevent the spread of pests. In the early 2000s in the US, irradiated meat was common at some grocery stores, but because of lack of consumer demand, it is no longer common. Because consumer demand for irradiated food is low, reducing the spoilage between manufacture and consumer purchase and reducing the risk of food borne illness is currently not sufficient incentive for most manufactures to supplement their process with irradiation.[24] Nevertheless, food irradiation does take place commercially and volumes are in general increasing at a slow rate, even in the European Union where all member countries allow the irradiation of dried herbs spices and vegetable seasonings but only a few allow other foods to be sold as irradiated.[66]

Although there are some consumers who choose not to purchase irradiated food, a sufficient market has existed for retailers to have continuously stocked irradiated products for years.[67] When labeled irradiated food is offered for retail sale, these consumers buy it and re-purchase it, indicating that it is possible to successfully market irradiated foods, therefore retailers not stocking irradiated foods might be a major bottleneck to the wider adoption of irradiated foods.[67] It is however, widely believed that consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation is more negative than those processed by other means[68] and some industry studies indicate the number of consumers concerned about the safety of irradiated food decreased between 1985 and 1995 to levels comparable to those of people concerned about food additives and preservatives.[69] Even though is it is untrue "People think the product is radioactive," said Harlan Clemmons, president of Sadex, a food irradiation company based in Sioux City, Iowa.[70] Because of these concerns and the increased cost of irradiated foods, there is not a widespread public demand for the irradiation of foods for human consumption.[24] Irradiated food does not become radioactive.

Standards & regulations

edit

The Codex Alimentarius represents the global standard for irradiation of food, in particular under the WTO-agreement. Member states are free to convert those standards into national regulations at their discretion,[citation needed] therefore regulations about irradiation differ from country to country.

The United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has passed a motion to commit member states to implement irradiation technology for their national phytosanitary programs; the General assembly of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has urged wider use of the irradiation technology.[citation needed]

Labeling

edit
 
The Radura symbol, as required by U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations to show a food has been treated with ionizing radiation.

The provisions of the Codex Alimentarius are that any "first generation" product must be labeled "irradiated" as any product derived directly from an irradiated raw material; for ingredients the provision is that even the last molecule of an irradiated ingredient must be listed with the ingredients even in cases where the unirradiated ingredient does not appear on the label. The RADURA-logo is optional; several countries use a graphical version that differs from the Codex-version. The suggested rules for labeling is published at CODEX-STAN – 1 (2005),[71] and includes the usage of the Radura symbol for all products that contain irradiated foods. The Radura symbol is not a designator of quality. The amount of pathogens remaining is based upon dose and the original content and the dose applied can vary on a product by product basis.[72]

The European Union follows the Codex's provision to label irradiated ingredients down to the last molecule of irradiated food. The European Community does not provide for the use of the Radura logo and relies exclusively on labeling by the appropriate phrases in the respective languages of the Member States. The European Union enforces its irradiation labeling laws by requiring its member countries to perform tests on a cross section of food items in the market-place and to report to the European Commission. The results are published annually in the OJ of the European Communities.[73]

The US defines irradiated foods as foods in which the irradiation causes a material change in the food, or a material change in the consequences that may result from the use of the food. Therefore, food that is processed as an ingredient by a restaurant or food processor is exempt from the labeling requirement in the US. All irradiated foods must include a prominent Radura symbol followed in addition to the statement "treated with irradiation" or "treated by irradiation.[65] Bulk foods must be individually labeled with the symbol and statement or, alternatively, the Radura and statement should be located next to the sale container.[3]

Food safety

edit

In 2003, the Codex Alimentarius removed any upper dose limit for food irradiation as well as clearances for specific foods, declaring that all are safe to irradiate. Countries such as Pakistan and Brazil have adopted the Codex without any reservation or restriction. Other countries, including New Zealand, Australia, Thailand, India, and Mexico, have permitted the irradiation of fresh fruits for fruit fly quarantine purposes, amongst others.[citation needed]

Standards that describe calibration and operation for radiation dosimetry, as well as procedures to relate the measured dose to the effects achieved and to report and document such results, are maintained by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM international) and are also available as ISO/ASTM standards.[74]

All of the rules involved in processing food are applied to all foods before they are irradiated.

United States

edit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the agency responsible for regulation of radiation sources in the United States.[3] Irradiation, as defined by the FDA is a "food additive" as opposed to a food process and therefore falls under the food additive regulations. Each food approved for irradiation has specific guidelines in terms of minimum and maximum dosage as deterred safe by the FDA.[3] Packaging materials containing the food processed by irradiation must also undergo approval. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) amends these rules for use with meat, poultry, and fresh fruit.[75]

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has approved the use of low-level irradiation as an alternative treatment to pesticides for fruits and vegetables that are considered hosts to a number of insect pests, including fruit flies and seed weevils. Under bilateral agreements that allows less-developed countries to earn income through food exports agreements are made to allow them to irradiate fruits and vegetables at low doses to kill insects, so that the food can avoid quarantine.

European Union

edit

European law dictates that all member countries must allow the sale of irradiated dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings.[76] However, these Directives allow Member States to maintain previous clearances food categories the EC's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) had previously approved (the approval body is now the European Food Safety Authority). Presently, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom allow the sale of many different types of irradiated foods.[77] Before individual items in an approved class can be added to the approved list, studies into the toxicology of each of such food and for each of the proposed dose ranges are requested. It also states that irradiation shall not be used "as a substitute for hygiene or health practices or good manufacturing or agricultural practice". These Directives only control food irradiation for food retail and their conditions and controls are not applicable to the irradiation of food for patients requiring sterile diets.

Because of the Single Market of the EC any food, even if irradiated, must be allowed to be marketed in any other Member State even if a general ban of food irradiation prevails, under the condition that the food has been irradiated legally in the state of origin. Furthermore, imports into the EC are possible from third countries if the irradiation facility had been inspected and approved by the EC and the treatment is legal within the EC or some Member state.[78][79][80][81][82]

Australia

edit

Australia banned irradiated cat food after a national scare where cats suffered from paralyzation after eating a specific brand of highly irradiated catfood for an extended period of time. The suspected culprit was malnutrition from consuming food depleted of Vitamin A by the irradiation process.[83][84] The incident was linked only to a single batch of one brand's product and no illness was linked to any of that brand's other irradiated batches of the same product or to any other brand of irradiated cat food. This, along with incomplete evidence indicating that the cat food was not sufficiently depleted of Vitamin A[85] makes irradiation a less likely cause.[86] Further research has been able to experimentally induce the paralyzation of cats by via Vitamin A deficiency by feeding highly irradiated food.[41] For more details see the Long term impacts section.

Nuclear safety and security

edit

Interlocks and safeguards are mandated to minimize this risk. There have been radiation-related accidents, deaths, and injury at such facilities, many of them caused by operators overriding the safety related interlocks.[87] In a radiation processing facility, radiation specific concerns are supervised by special authorities, while "Ordinary" occupational safety regulations are handled much like other businesses.

The safety of irradiation facilities is regulated by the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency and monitored by the different national Nuclear Regulatory Commissions. The regulators enforce a safety culture that mandates that all incidents that occur are documented and thoroughly analyzed to determine the cause and improvement potential. Such incidents are studied by personnel at multiple facilities, and improvements are mandated to retrofit existing facilities and future design.

In the US the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the safety of the processing facility, and the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the safe transport of the radioactive sources.

Irradiated food supply

edit

As of 2010, the quantities of foods irradiated in Asia, the EU and the US were 285,200, 9,300, and 103,000 tons.[88] Authorities in some countries use tests that can detect the irradiation of food items to enforce labeling standards and to bolster consumer confidence.[89][90][91] The European Union monitors the market to determine the quantity of irradiated foods, if irradiated foods are labeled as irradiated, and if the irradiation is performed at approved facilities.

Irradiation of fruits and vegetables to prevent the spread of pest and diseases across borders has been increasing globally. In 2010, 18,446 tonnes of fruits and vegetables were irradiated in six countries for export quarantine control. 97% of this was exported to the United States.[88]

In total, 103 000 tonnes of food products were irradiated on mainland United States in 2010. The three types of foods irradiated the most were spices (77.7%), fruits and vegetables (14.6%) and meat and poultry (7.77%). 17 953 tonnes of irradiated fruits and vegetables were exported to the mainland United States.[88] Mexico, the United States' state of Hawaii, Thailand, Vietnam and India export irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.[88][92][93] Mexico, followed by the United States' state of Hawaii, is the largest exporter of irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.[88]

In total, 6 876 tonnes of food products were irradiated in European Union countries in 2013; mainly in four member state countries: Belgium (49.4%), the Netherlands (24.4%), Spain (12.7%) and France (10.0%). The two types of foods irradiated the most were frog legs (46%), and dried herbs and spices (25%). There has been a decrease of 14% in the total quantity of products irradiated in the EU compared to the previous year 2012 (7 972 tonnes).[94]

United States

edit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have approved irradiation of the following foods and purposes:

  • Packaged refrigerated or frozen red meat[95] — to control pathogens (E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella) and to extend shelf life.[96]
  • Packaged poultry — control pathogens (Salmonella and Camplylobacter).[96]
  • Fresh fruits, vegetables, and grains — to control insects and inhibit growth, ripening and sprouting.[96]
  • Pork — to control trichinosis.[96]
  • Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings[97] — to control insects and microorganisms.[96]
  • Dry or dehydrated enzyme preparations — to control insects and microorganisms.[96]
  • White potatoes — to inhibit sprout development.[96]
  • Wheat and wheat flour — to control insects.[96]
  • Loose or bagged fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach[98]
    • *Crustaceans (lobster, shrimp, and crab)[3]
  • Shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops)[3]

Timeline of the history of food irradiation

edit
  • 1895 Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovers X-rays ("bremsstrahlung", from German for radiation produced by deceleration)
  • 1896 Antoine Henri Becquerel discovers natural radioactivity; Minck proposes the therapeutic use[99]
    • *1904 Samuel Prescott describes the bactericide effects Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)[100]
  • 1906 Appleby & Banks: UK patent to use radioactive isotopes to irradiate particulate food in a flowing bed[101]
  • 1918 Gillett: U.S. Patent to use X-rays for the preservation of food[102]
  • 1921 Schwartz describes the elimination of Trichinella from food[103]
  • 1930 Wuest: French patent on food irradiation[104]
  • 1943 MIT becomes active in the field of food preservation for the U.S. Army[105]
  • 1951 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission begins to co-ordinate national research activities
  • 1958 World first commercial food irradiation (spices) at Stuttgart, Germany[106]
  • 1970 Establishment of the International Food Irradiation Project (IFIP), headquarters at the Federal Research Centre for Food Preservation, Karlsruhe, Germany
  • 1980 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Irradiation recommends the clearance generally up to 10 kGy "overall average dose"[10]
  • 1981/1983 End of IFIP after reaching its goals
    • *1983 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: any food at a maximum "overall average dose" of 10 kGy
  • 1984 International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) becomes the successor of IFIP
  • 1998 The European Union's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) voted "positive" on eight categories of irradiation applications[107]
  • 1997 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Study Group on High-Dose Irradiation recommends to lift any upper dose limit[11]
  • 1999 The European Union issues Directives 1999/2/EC (framework Directive) and 1999/3/EC (implementing Directive) limiting irradiation a positive list whose sole content is one of the eight categories approved by the SFC, but allowing the individual states to give clearances for any food previously approved by the SFC.
  • 2000 Germany leads a veto on a measure to provide a final draft for the positive list.
  • 2003 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: no longer any upper dose limit
  • 2003 The SCF adopts a "revised opinion" that recommends against the cancellation of the upper dose limit.[43]
  • 2004 ICGFI ends
  • 2011 The successor to the SFC, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), reexamines the SFC's list and makes further recommendations for inclusion.[108]

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ a b c fresh or frozen red meat, poultry, and seafood
  2. ^ improve hygienic quality
  3. ^ shelf stable without refrigeration

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c anon., Food Irradiation – A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food, WHO, Geneva, 1991
  2. ^ "Food Irradiation" Canadian Food Inspection Agency. March 22, 2014.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Irradiated Food & Packaging - Food Irradiation: What You Need to Know". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
  4. ^ a b Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practices.
  5. ^ Diehl, J.F. (2002-03-01). "Food irradiation—past, present and future". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 63 (3–6): 211–215. doi:10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00622-3. ISSN 0969-806X.
  6. ^ Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Irradiated Food & Packaging - Overview of Irradiation of Food and Packaging". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
  7. ^ "FOOD IRRADIATION: A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food" (PDF). World Health Organization. 1988. Retrieved April 24, 2018.
  8. ^ Tauxe, Robert V. (June 2001). "Food Safety and Irradiation: Protecting the Public from Foodborne Infections 1". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 7 (7): 516–521. doi:10.3201/eid0707.017706. ISSN 1080-6040. PMC 2631852. PMID 11485644.
  9. ^ a b c d e Diehl, J.F., Safety of irradiated foods, Marcel Dekker, N.Y., 1995 (2. ed.)
  10. ^ a b c d e f World Health Organization. Wholesomeness of irradiated food. Geneva, Technical Report Series No. 659, 1981
  11. ^ a b c d e f World Health Organization. High-Dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated With Doses Above 10 kGy. Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Study Group. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999. WHO Technical Report Series No. 890
  12. ^ a b World Health Organization. Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Food. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994
  13. ^ a b US Department of Health, and Human Services, Food, and Drug Administration Irradiation in the production, processing, and handling of food. Federal Register 1986; 51:13376-13399
  14. ^ Cite error: The named reference :0 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practices.
  16. ^ Hallman, Guy J.; Loaharanu, Paisan (2016-12-01). "Phytosanitary irradiation – Development and application". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 129: 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.08.003. ISSN 0969-806X.
  17. ^ a b "eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations". www.ecfr.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
  18. ^ Feliciano, Chitho P. (2018-03-01). "High-dose irradiated food: Current progress, applications, and prospects". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 144: 34–36. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.11.010. ISSN 0969-806X.
  19. ^ Loaharanu, Paisan (1990). "Food irradiation: Facts or fiction?" (PDF). IAEA Bulletin. 32 (2): 44–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  20. ^ a b c d e f Loaharanu, Paisan (1990). "Food irradiation: Facts or fiction?" (PDF). IAEA Bulletin. 32 (2): 44–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  21. ^ http://journals.fcla.edu/flaent/article/view/88667
  22. ^ Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA, International Database on Insect Disinfestation and Sterilization – IDIDAS – http://www-ididas.iaea.org/IDIDAS/default.htm last visited November 16, 2007
  23. ^ http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/sphs/sphr/2015/00000011/00000003/art00008
  24. ^ a b c Martin, Andrew. Spinach and Peanuts, With a Dash of Radiation. New York Times. February 1, 2009.
  25. ^ a b c "Radiation Protection-Food Safety". epa.gov. Retrieved May 19, 2014.
  26. ^ "kid question rotting". Retrieved May 19, 2014.
  27. ^ Rajamani Karthikeyan, Manivasagam T, Anantharaman P, Balasubramanian T, Somasundaram ST; Manivasagam; Anantharaman; Balasubramanian; Somasundaram (2011). "Chemopreventive effect of Padina boergesenii extracts on ferric nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA)-induced oxidative damage in Wistar rats". J. Appl. Phycol. 23, Issue 2, Page 257 (2): 257–263. doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9564-0. S2CID 27537163.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. ^ a b anon., Safety and nutritional adequacy of irradiated food, WHO, Geneva, 1994
  29. ^ a b anon., Scientific Opinion on the Chemical Safety of Irradiation of Food, EFSA Journal 2011;9(4):1930 [57 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1930 last visited March 3, 2013
  30. ^ a b Bahramikia S., Yazdanparast R. (2010). "Antioxidant efficacy of Nasturtium officinale extracts using various in vitro assay systems". Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies. 3 (4): 283–290. doi:10.1016/s2005-2901(10)60049-0. PMID 21185544.
  31. ^ a b Bhat R.; Sridhar K. R.; Tomita Y.; Tomita-Yokotanib K. (2007). "Effect of ionizing radiation on antinutritional features of velvet bean seeds (Mucuna pruriens)". Food Chemistry. 103 (3): 860–866. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.037.
  32. ^ a b c d Pinela, José; Barreira, João C. M.; Barros, Lillian; Verde, Sandra Cabo; Antonio, Amilcar L.; Carvalho, Ana Maria; Oliveira, M. Beatriz P. P.; Ferreira, Isabel C. F. R. (2016-09-01). "Suitability of gamma irradiation for preserving fresh-cut watercress quality during cold storage". Food Chemistry. 206: 50–58. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.050. hdl:10198/13361. PMID 27041297.
  33. ^ Nunes, T. P., Martins, C. G., Faria, A. F., Bíscola, V., Souza, K. L. O., Mercadante, A. Z., et al. (2013). Changes in total ascorbic acid and carotenoids in minimally processed irradiated Arugula (Eruca sativa Mill) stored under refrigeration. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 90, 125–130. (2013). "Changes in total ascorbic acid and caroteniods in minimally processed irradiated Arugula". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 90: 125–130. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.03.044.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Fan Xuetong (2011). "Changes in Quality, Liking, and Purchase Intent of Irradiated Fresh-Cut Spinach during Storage". Journal of Food Science. 76 (6): S363–S368. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02207.x. PMID 21623783.
  35. ^ Vaishnav, J., Adiani, V., & Variyar, P. S. (2015). Radiation processing for enhancing shelf life and quality characteristics of minimally processed ready-to-cook (RTC) cauliflower (Brassica oleracea). Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 5, 50–55.
  36. ^ Tripathi, J., Chatterjee, S., Vaishnav, J., Variyar, P. S., & Sharma, A. (2013). Gamma irradiation increases storability and shelf life of minimally processed ready-tocook (RTC) ash gourd (Benincasa hispida) cubes. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 76, 17–25.
  37. ^ Zeng, F., Luo, Z., Xie, J., & Feng, S. (2015). Gamma radiation control quality and lignification of bamboo shoots (Phyllostachys praecox f. prevernalis.) stored at low temperature. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 102, 17–24.
  38. ^ Trigo M. J.; Sousa M. B.; Sapata M. M.; Ferreira A.; Curado T.; Andrada L.; Veloso M. G. (2009). "Radiation processing of minimally processed vegetables and aromatic plants". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 78 (7–8): 659–663. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.03.052.
  39. ^ Ramos, B., Miller, F. A., Brandão, T. R. S., Teixeira, P., & Silva, C. L. M. (2013). Fresh fruits and vegetables – An overview on applied methodologies to improve its quality and safety. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 20, 1–15.
  40. ^ "Food Irradiation: Unresolved Issues" (PDF). Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2001:33. Retrieved July 15, 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  41. ^ a b c Caulfield CD, Kelly JP, Jones BR, Worrall S, Conlon L, Palmer AC, Cassidy JP (2009). "The experimental induction of leukoencephalomyelopathy in cats". Vet Pathol. 46 (6): 1258–69. doi:10.1354/vp.08-VP-0336-C-FL. PMID 19605900. S2CID 10930691.
  42. ^ "FOOD IRRADIATION: WHY AREN'T WE USING IT?". harvard.edu.
  43. ^ a b Scientific Committee on Food. Revised opinion #193. Archived September 3, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  44. ^ "What's wrong with food irradiation?". www.organicconsumers.org. Retrieved 2017-04-17.
  45. ^ R.L. Wolke, What Einstein told his cook – Kitchen science explained, W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New York, 2002; see p.310 "Some Illumination on Irradiation"
  46. ^ "Ethiopia Is Using Radiation to Eradicate Tsetse Flies". voanews.com. November 14, 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
  47. ^ Applegate, K. L.; Chipley, J. R. (March 31, 1976). "Production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus ochraceus NRRL-3174 before and after exposures to 60Co irradiation". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 31 (3): 349–353. doi:10.1128/aem.31.3.349-353.1976. PMC 169778. PMID 938031.
  48. ^ "SCIENTIFIC STATUS SUMMARY Irradiation of Food". Institute of Food Technologists’ Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition in Food Technology. January 1998. Retrieved May 30, 2015.
  49. ^ "Does the XL Foods E-coli Scare Make the Case for Irradiation?". issuu.com. February 11, 2001. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
  50. ^ a b c d e http://www.sterigenics.com/services/food_safety/food_irradiation__questions_answers.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  51. ^ D.A.E. Ehlermann, The RADURA-terminology and food irradiation, Food Control 20 (2009), 526-528, doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.07.023
  52. ^ Cold Pasteurization of Food By Irradiation by Tim Roberts, Extension Specialist, Food Safety, Virginia Tech; Publication Number 458-300, posted August 1998 https://web.archive.org/web/20070102010926/http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/foods/458-300/458-300.html. Archived from the original on January 2, 2007. Retrieved June 1, 2016. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help) retrieved on November 15, 2007 https://web.archive.org/web/20070102010926/http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/foods/458-300/458-300.html. Archived from the original on January 2, 2007. Retrieved June 1, 2016. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  53. ^ See, e.g., The Truth about Irradiated Meat, CONSUMER REPORTS 34-37 (August 2003).
  54. ^ a b "The Use of Irradiation for Post-Harvest and Quarantine Commodity Control | Ozone Depletion – Regulatory Programs | U.S. EPA". Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  55. ^ a b c d anon., Gamma Irradiators for Radiation Processing, IAEA, Vienna, 2005
  56. ^ "anon., Dosimetry for Food Irradiation, IAEA, Vienna, 2002, Technical Reports Series No. 409" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  57. ^ K. Mehta, Radiation Processing Dosimetry – A practical manual, 2006, GEX Corporation, Centennial, US
  58. ^ "Irradiated Food Authorization Database (IFA)". Archived from the original on March 19, 2014. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  59. ^ "U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition. Office of Premarket Approval. Food Irradiation: The treatment of foods with ionizing radiation Kim M. Morehouse, PhD Published in Food Testing & Analysis, June/July 1998 edition (Vol. 4, No. 3, Pages 9, 32, 35)". March 29, 2007. Archived from the original on March 29, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  60. ^ "Annex III of Directive 1999/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 February 1999 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning foods and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation (OJ L 66, 13.3.1999, p. 16)". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  61. ^ "Information Notice No. 89-82: RECENT SAFETY-RELATED INCIDENTS AT LARGE IRRADIATORS". Nrc.gov. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  62. ^ "RADIATION PROCESSING WITH HIGH-ENERGY X-RAYS" (PDF).
  63. ^ Whaites, Eric; Roderick Cawson (2002). Essentials of Dental Radiography and Radiology. Elsevier Health Sciences. pp. 15–20. ISBN 0-443-07027-X.
  64. ^ (Forsythe and Evangel 1993, USDA 1989)
  65. ^ a b (Kunstadt et al., USDA 1989)
  66. ^ https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/biosafety/irradiation/reports_en
  67. ^ a b P. B. Roberts and Y. M. Hénon, Consumer response to irradiated food: purchase versus perception, Stewart Postharvest Review, September 2015, Vol. 11 (3:5), ISSN 1745-9656. http://www.foodirradiation.org/pages/Stewart/Roberts.pdf
  68. ^ Conley, S.T., What do consumers think about irradiated foods, FSIS Food Safety Review (Fall 1992), 11-15
  69. ^ Consumer Attitudes and Market Response to Irradiated Food, Author: Bruhn, Christine M.1 Journal of Food Protection, Volume 58, Number 2, February 1995, pp. 175–181(7), Publisher: International Association for Food Protection
  70. ^ Harris, Gardinier, "F.D.A. Allows Irradiation of Some Produce", The New York Times, August 22, 2008.
  71. ^ "GENERAL STANDARD FOR THE LABELLING OF PREPACKAGED FOODS. CODEX STAN 1-1985" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  72. ^ "CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21". Accessdata.fda.gov. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  73. ^ http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/scientific_advices_reports_en.htm Expand "Food Irradiation Reports" and select respective annual report and language
  74. ^ (see Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 12.02, West Conshohocken, PA, US)
  75. ^ USDA/FSIS and USDA/APHIS, various final rules on pork, poultry and fresh fruits: Fed.Reg. 51:1769–1771 (1986); 54:387-393 (1989); 57:43588-43600 (1992); and others more
  76. ^ EU: Food Irradiation – Community Legislation http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/comm_legisl_en.htm
  77. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities. 24 November, 2009. List of Member States' authorisations of food and food ingredients which may be treated with ionizing radiation.". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  78. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 October 2002. COMMISSION DECISION of 23 October 2004 adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  79. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities. October 13, 2004. COMMISSION DECISION of October 7, 2004 amending Decision 2002/840/EC adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods." (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  80. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 October 2007. Commission Decision of 4 December 2007 amending Decision 2002/840/EC as regards the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods." (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  81. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities. 23 March 2010 COMMISSION DECISION of 22 March 2010 amending Decision 2002/840/EC as regards the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  82. ^ "Official Journal of the European Communities of 24 May 2012 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 21 May 2012 amending Decision 2002/840/EC adopting the list of approved facilities in third countries for the irradiation of foods.". Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  83. ^ http://www.smh.com.au/national/catfood-irradiation-banned-as-pet-theory-proved-20090529-bq8h.html
  84. ^ http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-is-RSPCA-Australias-position-on-the-irradiation-of-imported-pet-food-products_307.html
  85. ^ Burke, Kelly (November 28, 2008). "Cat food firm blames death on quarantine controls". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved April 29, 2013.
  86. ^ Dickson, James. "Radiation meets food". Physics Today. Archived from the original on April 15, 2013. Retrieved March 22, 2013.
  87. ^ International Atomic Energy Agency. The Radiological Accident in Soreq
  88. ^ a b c d e "Food Irradiation in Asia, the European Union, and the United States" (PDF). Japan Radioisotope Association. May 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 9, 2015. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
  89. ^ McMurray, C.H., Gray, R., Stewart, E.M., Pearce, J., Detection methods for irradiated foods, Royal Society of Chemistry; Cambridge (GB); 1996
  90. ^ Raffi, J., Delincée, H., Marchioni, E., Hasselmann, C., Sjöberg, A.-M., Leonardi, M., Kent, M., Bögl, K.-W., Schreiber, G., Stevenson, H., Meier, W., Concerted action of the community bureau of reference on methods of identification of irradiated foods; bcr information; European Commission; Luxembourg; 1994, 119 p.; EUR--15261
  91. ^ "General Codex Methods for the Detection of Irradiated Foods, CODEX STAN 231-2001, Rev.1 2003" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  92. ^ "APHIS Factsheet" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. December 2008. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  93. ^ "Guidance for importing mangoes into the United States from Pakistan" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  94. ^ "Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Food and Food Ingredients Treated with Ionising Radiation FOR THE YEAR 2013" (PDF). European Commission. February 25, 2015. Retrieved July 18, 2015.
  95. ^ anon.,Is this technology being used in other countries? Archived November 5, 2007, at the Wayback Machine retrieved on November 15, 2007
  96. ^ a b c d e f g h "Food Irradiation-FMI Background" (PDF). Food Marketing Institute. February 5, 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 14, 2014. Retrieved June 2, 2014.
  97. ^ anon., Are irradiated foods in the U.S. supermarkets now? Archived November 5, 2007, at the Wayback Machine retrieved on November 15, 2007
  98. ^ "Irradiation: A safe measure for safer iceberg lettuce and spinach". US FDA. August 22, 2008. Retrieved December 31, 2009.
  99. ^ Minck, F. (1896) Zur Frage über die Einwirkung der Röntgen'schen Strahlen auf Bacterien und ihre eventuelle therapeutische Verwendbarkeit. Münchener Medicinische Wochenschrift 43 (5), 101-102.
  100. ^ S.C. Prescott, The effect of radium rays on the colon bacillus, the diphtheria bacillus and yeast. Science XX(1904) no.503, 246-248
  101. ^ Appleby, J. and Banks, A. J. Improvements in or relating to the treatment of food, more especially cereals and their products. British patent GB 1609 (January 4, 1906).
  102. ^ D.C. Gillet, Apparatus for preserving organic materials by the use of x-rays, US Patent No. 1,275,417 (August 13, 1918)
  103. ^ Schwartz B (1921). "Effect of X-rays on Trichinae". Journal of Agricultural Research. 20: 845–854.
  104. ^ O. Wüst, Procédé pour la conservation d'aliments en tous genres, Brevet d'invention no.701302 (July 17, 1930)
  105. ^ Physical Principles of Food Preservation: Von Marcus Karel, Daryl B. Lund, CRC Press, 2003 ISBN 0-8247-4063-7, S. 462 ff.
  106. ^ K.F. Maurer, Zur Keimfreimachung von Gewürzen, Ernährungswirtschaft 5(1958) nr.1, 45-47
  107. ^ Scientific Committee on Food. 15. Archived May 16, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  108. ^ European Food Safety Authority (2011). "Statement summarising the Conclusions and Recommendations from the Opinions on the Safety of Irradiation of Food adopted by the BIOHAZ and CEF Panels". EFSA Journal. 9 (4): 2107. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2107.

Further reading

edit

Table --. Adapted from Fan and Sommers (2013).[1]

Country Food products treated with irradiation
Algeria Potatoes
Argentina Spices, dried vegetables, garlic, egg products, dehydrated bovine serum
Australia Breadfruit, carambola, custard apple, longan, litchi, mango, mangosteen, papaya, rambutan, herbs, spices, herbal infusions
Bangladesh Potatoes, onions, dried fish
Belgium Feed for laboratory animals, spices, frozen frog legs, shrimp, aromatic herbs and teas, dehydrated vegetables
Brazil Spices, dehydrated vegetables, fruits, vegetables, grain
Canada Potatoes, onions, wheat flour, whole wheat flour, spices, dehydrated seasonings, mango
Czech Republic Spices
Chile Spices, condiments, dried vegetables, frozen food, potatoes, poultry
China Spices, pepper, condiments, seasonings, dried fruits, nuts and preserved fruit, cooked meat foods, fresh fruits and vegetables, frozen packaged meat, grains, beans and bean products, garlic spice, dehydrated vegetables
Croatia Tea herbs, chamomile, mixed spices, dry cauliflower and broccoli, paprika, liquid egg yolk, dry beef noodles
Cuba Potatoes, onions, beans
Denmark Spices
Ecuador Banana flour, spices, animal feed, raw jelly, honey, tea herbs
Egypt Fresh bulbs, tuber crops, dried garlic, dried onion, herbs and spices
Finland Spices
France Laboratory animal food, spices, Arabic gum, dehydrated vegetables, cereal, poultry, frog legs, shrimp, dried fruit and vegetables, rice flour, strawberries, bovine serum
Germany Spices
Ghana Yam, maize
Hungary Spices, onions, wine cork, enzymes
India Pulses, dried, fresh, and frozen seafood, spices, dry vegetables, seasonings, fresh mangoes
Indonesia Frozen sea products, frog legs, cacao powder, spices, food packaging, rice
Iran Spices, dried fruits, nuts
Iraq Spices
Israel Spices, condiments, dry ingredients
Italy Spices
Japan Potatoes
Korea Potato, onion, garlic, chestnut, mushroom (fresh and dried), spices, dried meat, shell fish powder, red pepper, paste powder, soy sauce powder, starch for condiments, dried vegetables, yeast-enzyme products, aloe powder, ginseng products, soybean paste powder, sterile meats
Malasia Spices
Mexico Spices, dried vegetables, chilli, dried meat, fresh guava, mango
Moroco Spices
Netherlands Spices, frozen products, poultry, dehydrated vegetables, egg powder, packaging material
New Zealand Breadfruit, carambola, custard apple, longan, litchi, mango, mangosteen, papaya, rambutan, herbs, spices, herbal infusions
Norway Spices
Pakistan Potatoes
Peru Spices, condiments, dehydrated products, medical herbs, flours, supplements
Philippines Spices (onion powder, garlic powder, cayenne powder, ground black pepper, Spanish paprika, dehydrated chives, ground anise, instant grave, sausage seasoning, minced onion), frozen fruits (avocado, mango, macapuno, durian, ube, atis, buco, cheese, fruit cocktail), papaya, mango, banana
Poland Spices, dried mushrooms, medical herbs
Portugal Spices
South Africa Cereal, dairy products, dehydrated foods, dried fruit, egg products, fish, fresh vegetable, garlic, health preparations, honey products, marinade, royal jelly, shelf-stable foods, soya mixtures, spices and herbs, yeast, vegetable powder
Syria Chicken, cocoa beans, condiments, dates, fresh and dried fish products, mango, onions, licorice, spices
Thailand Fermented pork sausage, sweet tamarind, spices, onions, enzymes, fresh mango, rambutan, litchi, longan, mangosteen, pineapple
Turkey Spices, dried seasonings and herbs, dried vegetables, meat and meat products, frozen fish and seafood, frozen frog legs, dried fruit
Ukraine Spices
United Kingdom Spices
United States Spices, chicken, beef, fish, fresh fruits and vegetables
Vietnam Spices, dragon fruit
Yugoslavia Spices
  1. ^ Fan, Xuetong (2013). Food Irradiation Research and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-8138--0209-1.

Current Draft: 5/9/18

Food Irradiation

edit

Food irradiation is the process of exposing food and food packaging to ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation, such as gamma rays, x-rays or electron beams, is energy that can be transmitted without direct contact of the food with the source of the energy (radiation), and capable of exciting or ionizing electrons in the target food molecules.[1][2] Radiation can be emitted by a radioactive substance or generated electrically. This treatment is used to extend product shelf-life (preservation), reduce the risk of foodborne illness, delay sprouting, sterilization of NASA meals, and as a means of controlling insects pests at different dosage levels.[3] Food irradiation primarily extends the shelf-life of irradiated foods by effectively destroying pathogenic and spoilage organisms and inhibiting sprouting.[3] It does not involve heat treatment and thus maintains the sensory and nutritional aspects of the food.[4] Although consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation have been negative when compared with those processed by other means, all independent research, and public health agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) have confirmed irradiation to be safe.[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Regulations for food irradiation vary based on country. FDA regulations require food treated with irradiation to be labeled as "treated with irradiation" on the final product along with the Radura symbol.[14]

Uses

edit

Depending on the dose, some or all the pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, viruses and pests present are destroyed, slowed down, or rendered incapable of reproduction.[4] At the doses (1-10 kGy) used, irradiation does not sterilize the food but pasteurizes it and hence irradiated food requires refrigeration.

Effects on Microorganisms

edit

Irradiation reduces postharvest losses by slowing down the rate of ripening. It inhibits spoilage microorganisms thus retarding spoilage of food. When used in low doses (0.06-0.2 kGy)[4], it prevents sprouting in fresh produce such as potatoes, onions, and garlic.[15]

It is also used for the inactivation and control of parasites in meat and meat products. It is used to extend the shelf life of seafood, raw fresh fish, fruits, and vegetable and can be used as an alternative method of treatment for the decontamination of spices, herbs, and dry seasonings.

Phytosanitary Irradiation

edit

Phytosanitary irradiation, which is the use of ionizing radiation to prevent the spread of invasive insect pests by trade in fresh produce across national and international borders, is a growing field in food irradiation. These insects if allowed to enter new habitats, could establish themselves as pests in the normal environment and would be difficult to get rid of and cause significant damage to agricultural production.[16]

Sterilization

edit

High doses of irradiation (greater than 10 kGy) are used by NASA to sterilize food intended for space flight programs (44 kGy)[17] and hospitals to sterilize foods in order to accomodate the diets of immunocompromised patients.[18] Irradiation can also be used to sterilize food packaging material.[17]

Treatment

edit

The electromagnetic sources used for radiation include a radioactive source, electron beam accelerators or X-rays. The dose of irradiation required, density of the food, and the power output determine the processing time of the target food.[4]

Gamma Irradiation

edit

Gamma Irradiation consist of photons obtained by radioactive decay of atomic nuclei. Every radioactive element gives rise to gamma rays with specific energies characteristic to the source element. Gamma irradiation is most widely used ionization technology because of its higher penetration depth and dose uniformity which allows for use on a large scale with high throughput. It is significantly less expensive than using an X-ray source[19]. The radioisotope cobalt-60 is the most common source of gamma rays for food irradiation in commercial scale facilities. It is obtained by neutron irradiation of cobalt-59 in specifically designed nuclear reactors. Cobalt-60 is water insoluble and hence has little risk of environmental contamination by leakage into the water systems. In limited applications, caesium-137, a less expensive alternative recovered during processing of spent nuclear fuel, is used as a radioactive source. Caesium-137, however, is water soluble and hence poses a risk of environmental contamination.[4] During processing, food is contained in steel/aluminum totes on a conveyor and travels around the Gamma source. Special precautions are taken to ensure that personnel and environment are protected from exposure. In most designs, to nullify the effects of radiation, the radioisotope is shielded by lowering it into a 6 m deep water-filled storage pool which absorbs the radiation but does not become radioactive.[4] This allows pallets of products to be added and removed from the irradiation chamber and other maintenance to be done. Sometimes, movable shields are used to reduce radiation levels in areas of the irradiation chamber instead of submerging the source.

Electron Beam

edit

Electron beam irradiation involves treatment of the target food by high energy electrons obtained from an electron gun that can be switched on and off. Electron beams have low dose uniformity and a penetration depth of only a few centimeters and hence the thickness of products treated using this method must be no greater than that for optimal processing.[4] Concrete walls of 3 m thickness along with lead (Pb) shielding are used to contain the radiation within the processing cell environment. The source of irradiation can be switched on and off.

X-ray

edit

X-rays irradiation uses X-rays produced by bombardment of dense target material with high energy accelerated electrons giving rise to a continuous energy spectrum. Heavy metals, such as tantalum and tungsten, are used because of their high atomic numbers and high melting temperatures. Tantalum is usually preferred over tungsten for industrial, large-area, high-power targets because it is more workable than tungsten and has a higher threshold energy for induced reactions. Like electron beams, X-rays do not necessitate the use of radioactive materials and can be switched off when not needed. X-rays have a penetration depth like that of gamma rays. However, they have low dose uniformity and are a very expensive source of irradiation as only 8% of the incident energy is converted into X-rays. The X-ray source is also shielded to protect personnel during treatment. [4] The source of the radiation can be manually switched on and off.

Dosimetry

edit

For purposes of legislation doses are divided into low (up to 1 kGy), medium (1 kGy to 10 kGy), and high-dose applications (above 10 kGy).[20] High-dose applications are above those currently permitted in the US for commercial food items by the FDA and other regulators around the world although these doses are approved for non-commercial applications, such as sterilizing frozen meat for NASA astronauts (doses of 44 kGy)[17] and food for hospital patients.[21][22]

Dosimeters are used to measure dose, and are small components that, when exposed to ionizing radiation, change measurable physical attributes to a degree that can be correlated to the dose received. Measuring dose (dosimetry) involves exposing one or more dosimeters along with the target material.[23]

Dose Distribution

edit

The distribution of dose of radiation varies from the food surface and the interior as it is absorbed as it moves through food and depends on the energy and density of the food. The ratio of the maximum dose permitted at the outer edge (Dmax) to the minimum limit to achieve processing conditions (Dmin) determines the uniformity of dose distribution. This ratio determines how uniform the irradiation process is.[4]

Applications by overall average dose[4]
ApplicationDose (kGy)
Low dose (up to 1 kGy)Inhibit sprouting of bulbs and tubers0.06 - 0.2
Delay fruit ripening0.5 - 1.0
Stop insect infestations to help clear quarantine0.15 - 1.0
Parasite control and inactivation0.3 - 1.0
Medium dose (1 kGy to 10 kGy)Extend shelf life of raw fresh fish, seafood and fresh produce1.0 - 5.5
Extend shelf life of refrigerated and frozen meat and meat products4.5 - 7.0
Reduce risk of pathogenic and spoilage microbes in meat, seafood, spices, raw or frozen poultry1.0 - 7.0
Increased juice yield, reduction in cooking time of dried vegetables3.0 - 7.0
High dose (above 10 kGy)Enzyme preparation deconatmination10.0
Sterilization of spices, dry vegetable seasonings30.0 max
Sterilization of packaging material10.0 - 25.0
Sterilization of foods used at NASA44.0

Irradiation facilities

edit

Regardless of treatment source, all processing facilities must adhere to safety standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).[24] Additional safety guidance is provided by the Codex Code of Practice for the Radiation Processing of Food, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).[24] More specifically, ISO 14470 and ISO 9001 provide in-depth information regarding safety in irradiation facilities.[24]

All commercial irradiation facilities contain safety systems that prevent exposure of radiation due to the design of the irradiators.[25] In addition to preventing exposure to the public, danger to workers is minimal as the radiation source is constantly shielded by water, concrete, or metal.[25] Irradiation facilities are designed with overlapping layers of protection, interlocks, and safeguards to take preventative measures of radiation exposure.[25] Additionally, "melt-downs" do not occur in facilities because the radiation source gives off radiation and decay heat; however, the heat is not sufficient to melt any material.[25]

As for transportation of the radiation source, the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the safe transport of the radioactive sources in the United States. Cobalt-60 is transported in special trucks that prevent release of radiation and meet standards mentioned in the Regulations for Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials of the International Atomic Energy Act.[25] The special trucks must meet uptight safety standards and pass extensive and extreme accidents to be approved to ship radiation sources.[25]

Effects of Food Irradiation

edit

Direct and indirect effects

edit

The energy produced by irradiation of food causes excitation and ionization of electrons, which leads to ejection of electrons from food atoms. Additionally, ionization gives rise to free radicals and charged ions which further react in the food thus causing radiolysis. Irradiation also forms oxidizing radicals (reactive oxygen species) such as hydroxyl radicals, hydroperoxyl radicals in high moisture foods due to the ionization of water.[4] These short-lived radicals destroy microbial cells in the food and are indirect products of irradiation.[26][27][28][29] The transmission of energy within the target food causes direct destruction of microorganisms and insect pests.[4]

Effect on microorganisms

Ionizing energy inactivates microorganisms by damaging DNA and RNA, cell membrane structure, and affecting metabolic enzyme activity in cells.[3] DNA and RNA are vital components in the cell nuclei required for cell growth and replication, and upon treatment, cells fail to replicate due to damage to their DNA and the inability of the DNA double helix to uncoil for replication.[3][4] Reduction in cell numbers depends on the irradiation dose used for treatment.[4] Sensitivity to radiation is reported as D10-value. D10-value is defined as the amount of radiation treatment required to reduce the population of a certain microorganism by 90%.[4] The D10-value depends on the microorganism, but is affected by temperature, growth medium, and moisture content.[4] Higher temperatures, simpler growth mediums, and increased moisture content result in decreased D10-values.[4]

Nutritional and sensory quality

edit

Since radiation is a cold process, commercial irradiation doses (1-10 kGy) on most foods have minimal impact on sensory qualities (color, taste, texture, appearance) and nutrient content.[3] Foods especially sensitive to changes in color are meat products (poultry, pork, and fish) and fruits and vegetables due to oxidation of the myoglobin by radiolytic products, such as reactive oxygen species, and changes in chlorophyll, anthocyanin, and carotenoids, respectively.[4][15] Due to their sensory changes, foods like eggs, milk, dairy, and certain fruits and vegetables, are unsuitable for treatment because of volatile off-flavors produced as a result of irradiation.[15] Additionally, irradiation can alter the taste of foods by organic acid production. Textural and appearance changes can especially arise in fruits and vegetables due to pectic substances, interior or peel damage, enhanced electrolyte leakage, or wound responses such as ethylene production and respiration rate.[4]

Physical attributes associated with common carbohydrates such as pectin, starch, and gums are not greatly affected by irradiation at commercial doses, thereby no major change in functionality nor nutritional factors of carbohydrates is observed. Amino acids that comprise proteins, remain in the same composition and digestible at commercial levels of irradiation.[4] Irradiation of foods with high fat content can result in lipid oxidation, which produce off-flavors and off-aromas due to byproducts of lipid oxidation.[4]

Micronutrients are minimally altered by irradiation. This holds especially true for vitamins such as thiamine, ascorbic acid, pyridoxine, retinol, and α-tocopherol. Vitamin inactivation is dependent on the vitamin itself along with dosage and type of product used for irradiation. Water-soluble vitamin D and vitamin K are mainly unaffected by irradiation while vitamin A and vitamin E are sensitive to radiation.[3][4]

Although changes in nutritional and sensory qualities by irradiation depend greatly on the degree of treatment and vary among foods, it is well researched that irradiation does not pose greater negative effects on food quality than any other food processing technology.[3][4]

Chemical changes

edit

Irradiation does not make food radioactive, just as an object exposed to light does not start producing light. To induce radiation, the atomic cores (nucleus) of the atoms in the target material must be modified. By only affecting the outermost electrons, foods treated with irradiation are not radioactive as irradiation does not provide enough energy to destabilize the nuclei of the food matrix. The energy used destroys bacteria but does not pose significant changes to the food itself.[30]

As a result of high energy, irradiated foods may form radiolytic products (hydrocarbons, aldehydes, and ketones) from ions and free radicals as a result of the high energy; however, there is no evidence to conclude that the free radicals produced by irradiation of food alter the safety of food products. Most products of irradiation are also present upon naturally-occurring food oxidation and in food that has been subjected to other food processing treatments, and therefore are not greatly unique. The family of chemicals formed exclusively by irradiation (2-alkylcyclobutanones, 2-ACB's) consists of a non-toxic, unique radiolytic products formed upon irradiating primarily fatty acids.[3][31] Alkylcyclobutanones are products obtained only by irradiation as they are yet to be discovered as products in raw or heat-processed foods.[3] However, the genotoxicity of alkylcyclobutanones is yet to be determined, therefore the true impact of them as radiolytic products is unknown.[3]

Irradiation, similar to thermal processing, also produces furans, especially in juices high in sugar and acid, fresh fruits and vegetables, and apple cider.[3] Furans are known to be carcinogenic at high doses and are also a form of antioxidants. Furans are also commonly found in baby foods, infant formula, coffee, food mixtures (soups and sauces), fish, canned fruits and vegetables, nuts, and meats.[32] The amount of furans produced by irradiation is to a lesser extent than when foods are heat processed or simply stored under refrigeration.[3] Another carcinogen produced by irradiation is benzene but is only formed at extremely high doses which are not allowed for food.[3]

Advantages of Irradiation

edit

Food irradiation has many advantages in regards to its process, efficiency, and overall production of food. This process improves overall microbial safety and reduces the risk of foodborne illness.[7] In regards to fresh foods, preservation may be achieved without the use of pesticides and reduce product contamination. Minimal heating is an advantage in preserving the organoleptic properties of various fruits and vegetables. Compared to most methods, nutritional value of foods are minimally reduced and the overall energy requirements are very low. Additionally, the food irradiation process can be done on packaged food, which allows for rapid treatment and shipment to consumers.[4]

Concerns of Irradiation

edit

In the production of any food product, various concerns about food safety, cost, and efficiency are at the forefront of any food manufacturer. Irradiation can be of concern if spoilage microorganisms are destroyed but pathogenic bacteria are not. Resistance of bacteria to irradiation treatment can lead to major health hazards if not resolved in a timely and efficient manner.[3] Nutritional value is minorly diminished and particles such as free radicals can be present in these foods causing adverse health effects. Lastly, cost is of major concern in which a high capital cost is required for irradiation based plants.[4]

Standards & regulations

edit

Irradiation treatment on food is approved in more than 37 countries around the world, thus several agencies are involved in the regulatory aspects of foods.[30] The Codex Alimentarius represents the global standard for irradiation of food, which has established a framework for international standards for food irradiation - known as the Codex Alimentarius General Principles of Food Hygiene.[24] However, nations may use their own regulations and labeling, but may be required to follow regulations pertaining to trading agreements.[24]

Food safety

edit

Standards that describe calibration and operation for radiation dosimetry, as well as procedures to relate the measured dose to the effects achieved and to report and document such results, are maintained by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM international) and are also available as ISO/ASTM standards.[24] All rules involved in processing food are applied to all foods before they are irradiated.[33] Before individual items in an approved class can be added to the approved list, studies into the toxicology of each of such food and for each of the proposed dose ranges are requested.[33] Radiation should not be used in lieu of good manufacturing or agricultural practices nor as a substitute to hygiene or health practices.[30]

In 2003, the Codex Alimentarius removed any upper dose limit for food irradiation as well as clearances for specific foods, declaring that all are safe to irradiate.[34] The General Standard provided by Codex states that the minimum irradiation dose should be enough to achieve its purpose while the maximum dose should not exceed a dose that could compromise consumer safety or cause adverse effects to structural integrity, functional properties, or sensory attributes of foods.[24] The Standard is not specific in regards to the use of irradiation on specific foods, but states that foods may be irradiated to approved dosage levels.[24] Recommended doses of accepted food products have been established by Codex, but only a few countries follow the recommendations. Brazil and Singapore have opted for an "any food, any dose, any purpose" approach assuming that the food tolerates the treatment.[24] Most countries will approve the use of irradiation on a specific food or food class on a case-by-case basis depending on the purpose of treatment based on procedures.[24]

Labeling

edit
 
The Radura symbol, as required by U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations to show a food has been treated with ionizing radiation.

The Radura symbol is associated with food that has been treated with ionizing radiation. The use of a Radura symbol in international food irradiation is optional, as stated in the rules for labeling is published at CODEX-STAN – 1 (2005).[35] The Radura symbol is not a designator of quality, but rather a label to inform consumers that products contain irradiated ingredients or are irradiated as a final product and must be located near the name of the food.[36] In addition to the Radura symbol, a written statement indicating irradiation treatment should be placed near the name of the food.[35] Irradiated products used as ingredients in other foods should be declared on the ingredient list while only a statement indicating treatment is required when a single ingredient product is made from an irradiated raw material.[35] Most countries, with the exception of the European Union (EU), Australia, and New Zealand have adopted the Codex General Standard on Labelling of Pre-Packaged Foods.[24] The EU, Australia, and New Zealand do not place the radura symbol on the food packaging, but require labeling indicating that food was irradiated on the food package, individual food product,, or in close proximity of whole foods.[24] Countries such as Indonesia require a statement of irradiation purpose or benefit to be placed on the packaging as well.[24] Labeling is not required in Malaysia if an irradiated ingredient is less than 5% by weight of the whole food; similarly, Canada does not require labeling if an irradiated ingredient comprises less the 10% by weight of the whole food.[24] Despite the recommendation of Codex Alimentarius to label all irradiated ingredients, labeling requirements tend to vary by nation.[24]

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) are the agencies responsible for regulation of radiation sources in the United States. USDA regulates irradiation of meat, poultry, and fresh fruit, while the FDA regulates the rest of the food commodities.[3] Each food approved for irradiation has specific guidelines in terms of minimum and maximum dosage as deterred safe by the FDA and USDA. The US defines irradiated foods as foods in which the irradiation causes a material change in the food, or a material change in the consequences that may result from the use of the food.[4] All irradiated foods must include a prominent Radura symbol followed in addition to the statement "treated with irradiation" or "treated by irradiation".[14] USDA has approved the use of low-level irradiation as an alternative treatment to pesticides for fruits and vegetables that are considered hosts to a number of insect pests, including fruit flies and seed weevils. USDA labeling regulations on single ingredient meats and poultry state that the treated product cannot be labeled as "natural," as irradiation is not a minimal process.[30] Irradiated meats and poultry can be labeled as "all," "pure," or "100%" if the ingredients support the claims.[30] Bulk foods must be individually labeled with the symbol and statement or, alternatively, the Radura and statement should be located at the point of sale.[3] Food that is processed as an ingredient by a restaurant or food processor is exempt from the labeling requirement in the US.[24] Additionally, when irradiated ingredients make up 10% or more of a finished food product, the ingredients must be be identified as "irradiated" in the list of ingredients.[37] The FDA defines irradiation as a "food additive" as opposed to a food process thus falls under the food additive regulations.[3][3] Packaging materials undergoing irradiation must also obtain agency approval.

Packaging

edit

Food processors and manufactures today struggle with using affordable,efficient packaging materials used for irradiation based processing. The implementation of irradiation on prepackaged foods has been found to impact foods by inducing specific chemical alterations to the food packaging material that migrates into the food. Crosslinking in various plastics can lead to physical and chemical modifications that can increase the overall molecular weight. On the other hand, chain scission is fragmentation of polymer chains that leads to a molecular weight reduction. [6]

Under section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act[38], irradiation of prepackaged foods requires premarket approval for not only the irradiation source for a specific food but also for the food packaging material. Approved packaging materials include various plastic films, yet does not cover a variety of polymers and adhesive based materials that have been found to meet specific standards. The lack of packaging material approval limits manufacturers production and expansion of irradiated prepackaged foods.[6]

Approved materials by FDA for Irradiation according to 21 CFR 179.45:[39]

MaterialPaper (kraft)Paper (glassine)PaperboardCellophane (coated) Polyolefin film Polyestyrene film Nylon-6 Vegetable Parchment Nylon 11
Amount of Irradiation (kGy) .05 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 60

Irradiated food supply

edit

Food irradiation is permitted by over 60 countries, with about 500,000 metric tons of food annually processed worldwide.[40][41][42] The regulations that dictate how food is to be irradiated, as well as the food allowed to be irradiated, vary greatly from country to country. In Austria, Germany, and many other countries of the European Union only dried herbs, spices, and seasonings can be processed with irradiation and only at a specific dose, while in Brazil all foods are allowed at any dose.[40][41]

As of 2010, the quantities of foods irradiated in Asia, the EU and the US were 285,200, 9,300, and 103,000 tons.[40][41][42]Authorities in some countries use tests that can detect the irradiation of food items to enforce labeling standards and to bolster consumer confidence. The European Union monitors the market to determine the quantity of irradiated foods, if irradiated foods are labeled as irradiated, and if the irradiation is performed at approved facilities.

Irradiation of fruits and vegetables to prevent the spread of pest and diseases across borders has been increasing globally. In 2010, 18,446 tonnes of fruits and vegetables were irradiated in six countries for export quarantine control. 97% of this was exported to the United States.[40][41][42]

In total, 103 000 tonnes of food products were irradiated on mainland United States in 2010.[40] The three types of foods irradiated the most were spices (77.7%), fruits and vegetables (14.6%) and meat and poultry (7.77%).[40] 17 953 tonnes of irradiated fruits and vegetables were exported to the mainland United States. Mexico, the United States' state of Hawaii, Thailand, Vietnam and India export irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.Mexico, followed by the United States' state of Hawaii, is the largest exporter of irradiated produce to the mainland U.S.[40][41][42]

In total, 6 876 tonnes of food products were irradiated in European Union countries in 2013; mainly in four member state countries: Belgium (49.4%), the Netherlands (24.4%), Spain (12.7%) and France (10.0%).[41][42] The two types of foods irradiated the most were frog legs (46%), and dried herbs and spices (25%). There has been a decrease of 14% in the total quantity of products irradiated in the EU compared to the previous year 2012 (7 972 tonnes).[40]

United States

edit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have approved irradiation of the following foods and purposes[17]:

  • Packaged refrigerated or frozen red meat[43] — to control pathogens (E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella) and to extend shelf life.[44]

    • *Packaged poultry — control pathogens (Salmonella and Camplylobacter).[44]

    • Fresh fruits, vegetables, and grains — to control insects and inhibit growth, ripening and sprouting.[44]
    • Pork — to control trichinosis.[44]
    • Herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings[45] — to control insects and microorganisms.[44]
    • Dry or dehydrated enzyme preparations — to control insects and microorganisms.[44]
    • White potatoes — to inhibit sprout development.[44]
    • Wheat and wheat flour — to control insects.[44]
    • Loose or bagged fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach[46]
    • Crustaceans (lobster, shrimp, and crab)[47]
    • Shellfish (oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops)[47]

    UK The Food Standards Agency (FSA) allows irradiation on the following general food categories (and maximum dosage allowed):[48]

    • Fruit (2 kGy)
    • Vegetables (1 kGy)
    • Cereals (1kGy)
    • Bulbs and tubers (0.2 kGy)
    • Dried aromatic herbs, spices and vegetable seasonings (10 kGy)
    • Fish and shellfish (3 kGy)
    • Poultry (7 kGy)

    Canada With the exception of the foods listed below, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency does not allow irradiation of food in Canada:[37]

    • Potatoes
    • Onions
    • Wheat, flour, whole wheat flour
    • Whole or ground spices and dehydrated seasoning preparations
    • Fresh raw ground beef
    • Frozen raw ground beef

    China National standards for food irradiation (and maximum dosage allowed) in China are the following:[49]

    • Poultry and livestock, cooked (8 kGy)
    • Pollen (8 kGy)
    • Dried nuts and preserved fruits (0.4-1 kGy)
    • Spices (10 kGy)
    • Fresh fruits and vegetables (1.5 kGy)
    • Pork (0.65 kGy)
    • Beans and bean products (0.2 kGy)

    EU The European Commission has approved the use of food irradiation in the following products:[50]

    • Fruits and vegetables
    • Cereals and rice flour
    • Spices and condiments
    • Fish and shellfish
    • Fresh meats, poultry, and frog legs
    • Raw milk camembert
    • Gum arabic, casein, and egg whites
    • Blood products

    Cost

    edit

    The cost of food irradiation is influenced by dose requirements, volume and type of product, type and efficiency of radiation source, the food's tolerance of radiation, handling conditions, i.e., packaging and stacking requirements, construction costs, financing arrangements, and other variables particular to the situation.[51][52] In the case of large research or contract irradiation facilities, major capital costs include a radiation source, hardware (irradiator, totes and conveyors, control systems, and other auxiliary equipment), land (1 to 1.5 acres), radiation shield, and warehouse. Irradiation is a capital-intensive technology requiring a substantial initial investment, ranging from $1 million to $5 million. Operating costs include salaries (for fixed and variable labor), utilities, maintenance, taxes/insurance, cobalt-60 replenishment, general utilities, and miscellaneous operating costs.[53][51] In the United States, the cost of food irradiation ranges between $0.02 and $0.40 per kilogram, varying depending on all the variables associated with irradiation.[51]

    Public perception

    edit

    Negative connotations associated with the word "radiation" are thought to be responsible for low consumer acceptance. Several national expert groups and two international expert groups evaluated the available data and concluded that any food at any dose is wholesome and safe to consume.[30]

    Irradiation has been approved by many countries. For example, in the U.S. the FDA has approved food irradiation for over fifty years.[3] However, in the past decade the major growth area is for fruits and vegetables that are irradiated to prevent the spread of pests. In the early 2000s in the US, irradiated meat was common at some grocery stores, but because of lack of consumer demand, it is no longer common. Because consumer demand for irradiated food is low, the benefits of shelf-life extension and reducing the risk of food borne illness are currently not sufficient incentive for most manufactures to supplement their process with irradiation. Nevertheless, food irradiation does take place commercially and volumes are in general increasing at a slow rate, even in the European Union where all member countries allow the irradiation of dried herbs spices and vegetable seasonings but only a few allow other foods to be sold as irradiated.

    Although there are some consumers who choose not to purchase irradiated food, a sufficient market has existed for retailers to have continuously stocked irradiated products for years. When labeled irradiated food is offered for retail sale, these consumers buy and re-purchase it, indicating that it is possible to successfully market irradiated foods; therefore retailers not stocking irradiated foods might be a major bottleneck to the wider adoption of irradiated foods. It is however, widely believed that consumer perception of foods treated with irradiation is more negative than those processed by other means. Because of these concerns and the increased cost of irradiated foods, there is not a widespread public demand for the irradiation of foods for human consumption.

    Timeline of the history of food irradiation[edit]

    edit
    • 1895 Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovers X-rays ("bremsstrahlung", from German for radiation produced by deceleration)
    • 1896 Antoine Henri Becquerel discovers natural radioactivity; Minck proposes the therapeutic use[54]
    • 1904 Samuel Prescott describes the bactericide effects Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)[55]
    • 1906 Appleby & Banks: UK patent to use radioactive isotopes to irradiate particulate food in a flowing bed[56]
    • 1918 Gillett: U.S. Patent to use X-rays for the preservation of food[57]
    • 1921 Schwartz describes the elimination of Trichinella from food[58]
    • 1930 Wuest: French patent on food irradiation[59]
    • 1943 MIT becomes active in the field of food preservation for the U.S. Army[60]
    • 1951 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission begins to co-ordinate national research activities
    • 1958 World first commercial food irradiation (spices) at Stuttgart, Germany[61]
    • 1970 Establishment of the International Food Irradiation Project (IFIP), headquarters at the Federal Research Centre for Food Preservation, Karlsruhe, Germany

    1980 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Irradiation recommends the clearance generally up to 10 kGy "overall average dose"[10]

    • 1981/1983 End of IFIP after reaching its goals
    • 1983 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: any food at a maximum "overall average dose" of 10 kGy
    • 1984 International Consultative Group on Food Irradiation (ICGFI) becomes the successor of IFIP
    • 1998 The European Union's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) voted "positive" on eight categories of irradiation applications[62]
    • 1997 FAO/IAEA/WHO Joint Study Group on High-Dose Irradiation recommends to lift any upper dose limit[11]
    • 1999 The European Union issues Directives 1999/2/EC (framework Directive) and 1999/3/EC (implementing Directive) limiting irradiation a positive list whose sole content is one of the eight categories approved by the SFC, but allowing the individual states to give clearances for any food previously approved by the SFC.
    • 2000 Germany leads a veto on a measure to provide a final draft for the positive list.
    • 2003 Codex Alimentarius General Standard for Irradiated Foods: no longer any upper dose limit
    • 2003 The SCF adopts a "revised opinion" that recommends against the cancellation of the upper dose limit.[63]
    • 2004 ICGFI ends
    • 2011 The successor to the SFC, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), reexamines the SFC's list and makes further recommendations for inclusion.[64]
    1. ^ anon., Food Irradiation – A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food, WHO, Geneva, 1991
    2. ^ "Food Irradiation" Canadian Food Inspection Agency. March 22, 2014.
    3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Irradiated Food & Packaging - Food Irradiation: What You Need to Know". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
    4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practices.
    5. ^ Diehl, J.F. (2002-03-01). "Food irradiation—past, present and future". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 63 (3–6): 211–215. doi:10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00622-3. ISSN 0969-806X.
    6. ^ a b c Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Irradiated Food & Packaging - Overview of Irradiation of Food and Packaging". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
    7. ^ a b "FOOD IRRADIATION: A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food" (PDF). World Health Organization. 1988. Retrieved April 24, 2018.
    8. ^ Tauxe, Robert V. (June 2001). "Food Safety and Irradiation: Protecting the Public from Foodborne Infections 1". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 7 (7): 516–521. doi:10.3201/eid0707.017706. ISSN 1080-6040. PMC 2631852. PMID 11485644.
    9. ^ Diehl, J.F., Safety of irradiated foods, Marcel Dekker, N.Y., 1995 (2. ed.)
    10. ^ a b World Health Organization. Wholesomeness of irradiated food. Geneva, Technical Report Series No. 659, 1981
    11. ^ a b World Health Organization. High-Dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated With Doses Above 10 kGy. Report of a Joint FAO/IAEA/WHO Study Group. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1999. WHO Technical Report Series No. 890
    12. ^ World Health Organization. Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Food. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994
    13. ^ US Department of Health, and Human Services, Food, and Drug Administration Irradiation in the production, processing, and handling of food. Federal Register 1986; 51:13376-13399
    14. ^ a b http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/biosafety/irradiation/scientific_advices_reports_en.htm Expand "Food Irradiation Reports" and select respective annual report and language
    15. ^ a b c Loaharanu, Paisan (1990). "Food irradiation: Facts or fiction?" (PDF). IAEA Bulletin. 32 (2): 44–48. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
    16. ^ Hallman, Guy J.; Loaharanu, Paisan (2016-12-01). "Phytosanitary irradiation – Development and application". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 129: 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.08.003. ISSN 0969-806X.
    17. ^ a b c d "eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations". www.ecfr.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
    18. ^ Feliciano, Chitho P. (2018-03-01). "High-dose irradiated food: Current progress, applications, and prospects". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 144: 34–36. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.11.010. ISSN 0969-806X.
    19. ^ Cleland, M.R.; Pageau, G.M. (1987-04-03). "Comparisons of X-ray and gamma-ray sources for industrial irradiation processes". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 24–25: 967–972. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(87)80290-2. ISSN 0168-583X.
    20. ^ "U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition. Office of Premarket Approval. Food Irradiation: The treatment of foods with ionizing radiation Kim M. Morehouse, PhD Published in Food Testing & Analysis, June/July 1998 edition (Vol. 4, No. 3, Pages 9, 32, 35)". March 29, 2007. Archived from the original on March 29, 2007. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    21. ^ Pryke, D. C.; Taylor, R. R. (December 1995). "The use of irradiated food for immunosuppressed hospital patients in the United Kingdom". Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 8 (6): 411–416. doi:10.1111/j.1365-277x.1995.tb00336.x. ISSN 0952-3871.
    22. ^ "Irradiated Food Authorization Database (IFA)". Archived from the original on March 19, 2014. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    23. ^ Kuntz, Florent; Strasser, Alain (2016-12-01). "The specifics of dosimetry for food irradiation applications". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 129: 46–49. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.08.023. ISSN 0969-806X.
    24. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Roberts, Peter B. (December 2016). "Food irradiation: Standards, regulations and world-wide trade". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 129: 30–34. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.06.005. ISSN 0969-806X.
    25. ^ a b c d e f "Food Irradiation Processing Alliance Q and A" (PDF).
    26. ^ "SCIENTIFIC STATUS SUMMARY Irradiation of Food". Institute of Food Technologists’ Expert Panel on Food Safety and Nutrition in Food Technology. January 1998. Retrieved May 30, 2015.
    27. ^ "Ethiopia Is Using Radiation to Eradicate Tsetse Flies". voanews.com. November 14, 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
    28. ^ Applegate, K. L.; Chipley, J. R. (March 31, 1976). "Production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus ochraceus NRRL-3174 before and after exposures to 60Co irradiation". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 31 (3): 349–353. doi:10.1128/aem.31.3.349-353.1976. PMC 169778. PMID 938031.
    29. ^ "Does the XL Foods E-coli Scare Make the Case for Irradiation?". issuu.com. February 11, 2001. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
    30. ^ a b c d e f "Food Irradiation A Guide for Consumers, Policymakers and the Media" (PDF).
    31. ^ Ehlermann, Dieter A.E. (2016-12-01). "Wholesomeness of irradiated food". Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 129: 24–29. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.08.014. ISSN 0969-806X.
    32. ^ Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Chemical Contaminants - Exploratory Data on Furan in Food: Individual Food Products". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-19.
    33. ^ a b (see Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 12.02, West Conshohocken, PA, US)
    34. ^ (see Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 12.02, West Conshohocken, PA, US)
    35. ^ a b c "GENERAL STANDARD FOR THE LABELLING OF PREPACKAGED FOODS. CODEX STAN 1-1985" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    36. ^ "CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21". Accessdata.fda.gov. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    37. ^ a b Directorate, Government of Canada,Canadian Food Inspection Agency,Food Labelling and Claims. "Irradiated Foods". www.inspection.gc.ca. Retrieved 2018-04-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    38. ^ "FDA Cosmetic Act" (PDF). Biotech. Retrieved 05/06/18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
    39. ^ "Irradiation Packaging". FDA. Retrieved May 6th, 2018. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
    40. ^ a b c d e f g h "Food Irradiation in Asia, the European Union, and the United States" (PDF). Japan Radioisotope Association. May 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 9, 2015. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
    41. ^ a b c d e f "APHIS Factsheet" (PDF). United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. December 2008. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    42. ^ a b c d e "Guidance for importing mangoes into the United States from Pakistan" (PDF). Retrieved March 19, 2014. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
    43. ^ anon.,Is this technology being used in other countries? Archived November 5, 2007, at the Wayback Machine retrieved on November 15, 2007
    44. ^ a b c d e f g h "Food Irradiation-FMI Background" (PDF). Food Marketing Institute. February 5, 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 14, 2014. Retrieved June 2, 2014.
    45. ^ anon., Are irradiated foods in the U.S. supermarkets now? Archived November 5, 2007, at the Wayback Machine retrieved on November 15, 2007
    46. ^ "Irradiation: A safe measure for safer iceberg lettuce and spinach". US FDA. August 22, 2008. Retrieved December 31, 2009.
    47. ^ a b Nutrition, Center for Food Safety and Applied. "Irradiated Food & Packaging - Food Irradiation: What You Need to Know". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 2018-04-14.
    48. ^ Agency, Food Standards. "Irradiated food | Food Standards Agency". www.food.gov.uk. Retrieved 2018-04-26.
    49. ^ Chen, Hao (2013). "Food Irradiation in China" (PDF).
    50. ^ "Legislation - Food Safety - European Commission". Food Safety. Retrieved 2018-04-20.
    51. ^ a b c "Food Irradiation: A technique for preserving and improving the safety of food". World Health Organization.
    52. ^ (Forsythe and Evangel 1993, USDA 1989)
    53. ^ "The Use of Irradiation for Post-Harvest and Quarantine Commodity Control | Ozone Depletion – Regulatory Programs | U.S. EPA". Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
    54. ^ Minck, F. (1896) Zur Frage über die Einwirkung der Röntgen'schen Strahlen auf Bacterien und ihre eventuelle therapeutische Verwendbarkeit. Münchener Medicinische Wochenschrift 43 (5), 101-102.
    55. ^ S.C. Prescott, The effect of radium rays on the colon bacillus, the diphtheria bacillus and yeast. Science XX(1904) no.503, 246-248
    56. ^ Appleby, J. and Banks, A. J. Improvements in or relating to the treatment of food, more especially cereals and their products. British patent GB 1609 (January 4, 1906).
    57. ^ D.C. Gillet, Apparatus for preserving organic materials by the use of x-rays, US Patent No. 1,275,417 (August 13, 1918)
    58. ^ Schwartz B (1921). "Effect of X-rays on Trichinae". Journal of Agricultural Research. 20: 845–854.
    59. ^ O. Wüst, Procédé pour la conservation d'aliments en tous genres, Brevet d'invention no.701302 (July 17, 1930)
    60. ^ Physical Principles of Food Preservation: Von Marcus Karel, Daryl B. Lund, CRC Press, 2003 ISBN 0-8247-4063-7, S. 462 ff.
    61. ^ K.F. Maurer, Zur Keimfreimachung von Gewürzen, Ernährungswirtschaft 5(1958) nr.1, 45-47
    62. ^ Scientific Committee on Food. 15. Archived May 16, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
    63. ^ Scientific Committee on Food. Revised opinion #193. Archived September 3, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
    64. ^ European Food Safety Authority (2011). "Statement summarising the Conclusions and Recommendations from the Opinions on the Safety of Irradiation of Food adopted by the BIOHAZ and CEF Panels". EFSA Journal. 9 (4): 2107. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2107.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Herna327/sandbox&oldid=1092704858"