Abolish RfA?

edit
 
And Ye shall know Him for the mark - and the mark will be Blue, with a bit of punctuation and some yellowish color colours as well. And not be quite as good as a lot of other signatures.

I'd like to propose that we abolish the RfA system, and begin going by "Pedro's law" - all candidates must now go to User:Pedro's talk page and ask for permission, where he may then use his powerful ways to grant the tools. The only main criteria: The candidate must have a tail. Opinions? iMatthew :  Chat  00:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

*Oppose, such a bad idea on so many levels. The Cool Kat (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Oppose unless all existing admins are required to go through the process. With luck, we can get rid of the whole gang and start clean. Did I mention I'm an admin?-- Wehwalt :  Chat  01:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • !Vote for Pedro Nihiltres :  Chat 
  • Do not delete Forum on adminz rulz, should stay for on wiki --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ron Ritzman (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • BALLEEEEETTTEEEE PLZ We should AGF and give everyone admin tools LetsdrinkTea 01:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote to XfD User:Pedro .. since I lost my tail in a lawnmower accident and am no longer eligible. Just kidding of course, you're the best Pedro.Ched :  Chat  01:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Cabal I mean ZOMG SuPP0rTz!!11!oneone!!. nn123645 :  Chat  01:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  1. Support. BTW, why is everyone using Pedro's signature? MathCool10 :  Chat 
    IDK my BFF JILL?--Giants27 :  Chat  01:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

A side note

edit

I did think that this edit summary was the funniest one I've seen for ages... Majorly talk 01:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

No kidding.--Giants27 T/C 01:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Section break

edit

I thought I'd put this here, just in case. Majorly talk 00:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Is it arbitrary?--Giants27 T/C 01:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Not only that, it is capricious.--Wehwalt (talk) 01:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

*Strong Delete - The arbitraryness of this section is clearly not established in any reliable sources. J.delanoy :  Chat  01:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Struck probable sockpuppet of J.delanoy Camw :  Chat  01:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
StruckUnderlined probable sockpuppet of Camw NuclearWarfare :  Chat  01:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Another strike, I smell feet, oh wait that's my feet, I should put socks on.--Giants27 :  Chat  01:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Abolish Wikipedia?

edit

I'd like to propose that we abolish Wikipedia, and begin going by "Pedro's law" - all people wanting information must now go to User:Pedro's talk page (Pedropedia) and ask for the information to be provided to them, where he may then use his powerful knowledge to grant the information. The only main criteria: The request must include a vote for Pedro. Opinions? Camw :  Chat  02:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I think I've heard this joke before... --Tango (talk) 02:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Struck comment with incorrect signature format. Camw :  Chat  02:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)