I can now be found editing as Spidey104 because in my anger as I retired I put a block on this account. The information below is being kept in the same state it was in when I retired as an archive of sorts.



















My wife and I are both Ph.D. graduate students, but we are in very different departments. We both love animals, so we own a few:

My interests edit




I own over 3,450 comic books and most of my edits are to comic book articles. The majority of the comics I own were published by Marvel Comics, so my edits are focused on Marvel articles. On rare occasion I will also edit some television show articles. The shows that I might edit are: C.S.I., Heroes, Scrubs, The Spectacular Spider-Man, Blade: The Series, and Journeyman.


Pages I watch edit

Pages I created edit

Pages are listed in chronological order of creation within each section.

Comic book pages edit

Pages created to help shorten the main article edit

CSI pages edit

My view on use of Wikipedia edit

As I stated above, or if you check my contributions you will see that I primarily edit comic book articles. My other edits are usually television shows or movies. Even for the Trivia Cleanup project I mostly fixed only that type of article. In other words, I primarily edit articles about popular culture. In my opinion that is the only useful type of article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not allowed as a resource for any accredited university class. Anyone being able to edit Wikipedia allows the articles about popular culture/fictional topics to stay current (people can post a whole new article about a TV show episode immediately after it airs for the first time, or people update comic pages as soon as they have finished reading a new issue), but it also makes articles about factual topics unreliable. There is no single author, and there is no way you can prove that the current edit was proofread by someone who actually knows the topic.

"The standard for inclusion is verifiability, not truth." That is Wikipedia's standard for inclusion. I am not making that up; I am quoting. The truth can be (and often is) deleted for something false because it is easier to verify.

Wikipedia is useful for popular culture (comic books, movies, television, music, etc.). Wikipedia is not useful for research. PERIOD