Confocal endoscopy, or confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), is a modern imaging technique that allows the examination of real-time microscopic and histological features inside the body. In the word “endomicroscopy”, endo- means “within” and -skopein means “to view or observe”. CLE, also known as “optical biopsy”, can analyse histology and cytology features of a tissue which otherwise is only possible by tissue biopsy.
Similar to confocal microscopy, the laser in CLE filtered by the pinhole excites the fluorescent dye through a beam splitter and objective lens. The fluorescent emission then follows similar paths into the detector. A pinhole is used to select emissions from the desired focal plane. Two categories of CLE exist, namely probe-based (pCLE) and the less common endoscopy-based endoscopy (eCLE).[1]
CLE can be intubated to study the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and accessory digestive organs with a fluorescent dye. A variety of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Barrett’s oesophagus, can be diagnosed by the magnified and in-depth view in combination with traditional endoscopy.[2] Adverse effects may include nausea, vomiting and erythema, yet they are rarely observed. Due to limited pathologies identifiable, limited approved contrast agents, and the complexity of the optical system, CLE can be used as a complement along with biopsy forceps by sharing the same hollow working channel in an endoscope.
Types edit
Two types of CLE have been invented, namely probe-based (pCLE) and endoscope-based CLE (eCLE). Both require a trackball for controlling real-time images, and a pedal switch for controlling the light source.
Probe-based CLE edit
pCLE, developed by Mauna Kea Technologies, is a fibre bundle transit through the 2.8 mm working channel (the hollow hole) of the standard endoscope into the GI tract.[1] With a fixed plane of imaging, each fibre acts as a pinhole to filter unwanted noise. The frame rate lies between 9 to 12 images/second.[1]
| pCLE Products | Usage |
|---|---|
| GastroFlex | Upper GI |
| ConolFlex | Lower GI |
| CholangioFlex | Cholangiopancreatography |
| AQ-19 | Fine needle aspiration |
| Needle-based CLE | Endoscopic ultrasound needle (EUS) |
Endoscope-based CLE edit
eCLE, developed by Pentax, is a confocal microscopy fixed at the end of the endoscopic tube. The integrated machine of eCLE is larger than the pCLE in diameter, making GI tract endoscopic intubation more difficult. eCLE has ceased commercially due to the camera’s inflexibility.[1]
Medical uses edit
The principal use of CLE is to examine the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract, as well as their accessory organs, in great detail. To date, endoscopy can be utilised for the diagnosis of cancer and inflammation in such locations.
Oesophagus edit
CLE is effective in detecting premalignant, including Barrett's oesophagus, and malignant (cancerous) lesions in the upper GI tract.[3][4][5] The modifications of mucosa shown in histopathology as an index of malignancy can be identified under CLE, such as high-grade dysplasia. CLE can also be implemented to refer to the treatment of Barrett’s oesophagus by measuring the lateral extent of neoplasia.[3][5]
The Miami classification is the most popular system in oesophageal CLE diagnosis.[4][6]
Stomach and duodenum edit
Similar to that of the oesophagus, CLE is able to detect early gastric cancer, as well as premalignant conditions, such as gastritis and intestinal metaplasia.[1][2][4] CLE can detect and distinguish the stomach pit patterns to identify the disease in accordance with the Miami classification, which was refined in 2016 to include both pit patterns and the architecture of blood vessels.[1][2][6][7] The refined classification allows clinicians to differentiate between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions.[7]
The presence of Helicobacter pylori can also be identified using CLE by viewing the morphological changes in tissues.[8][9]
Lower Gastrointestinal Tract edit
CLE has demonstrated prominent effects in the detection of a wide range of intestinal diseases.
CLE reveals “soccer ball-like pattern” of narrower capillaries in malignant lymphomas; distorted architecture and fluorescein leakage from lumen in colonic adenocarcinoma; and blunt-shaped villi and crypts and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes in coeliac disease.[1][2][10]
CLE can be utilized to identify adenoma and neoplasia in colorectal polyps and lesions.[11][12] The Miami classification provides guidelines for clinicians to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions.[6]
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) edit
CLE can be used for the identification of IBD and its subtypes (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) based on the observation on morphological characteristics, such as architectural distortion, lowered crypt density, crypt irregularity and an abnormally high density of epithelial gaps.[1][2][13] The prediction of IBD progression on non-inflamed epithelium is achievable, too, making way for a novel “treat-to-target” therapeutic approach.[1][2]
Pancreas edit
Incorporating an EUS, CLE can accurately diagnose pancreatic cystic lesions, including mucinous and non-mucinous lesions.[2][14] Special needles are used to collect fluid and cyst wall tissues for testing.[14] Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can also be viewed by CLE.[15] Observing cystic lesions and PDAC, clinicians can identify early chronic pancreatitis and determine the malignancies of lesions.[15]
Biliary duct edit
Biliary stricture can be viewed by CLE.[1] The Miami and Paris classifications can be adapted to differentiate cancerous and inflammatory causes.[16]
Others edit
The discrimination of inflammation and malignant tumor in lung and the urinary system may be done by using CLE and this is currently under research.[8][17] Some usages such as oral and other head-and-neck cancer diagnosis have been proposed.[18][19]
Molecular imaging edit
Antibodies of molecular targets are used to diagnose GI diseases by histology.[20][21] CLE captures the fluorescence produced by specific antibodies binding to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Comparing the significant difference in fluorescent strength, clinicians can differentiate normal and neoplastic tissue. Molecular imaging with antibodies may be applied to CLE as a diagnostic benchmark due to high correlation with ex vivo microscopy.[20]
The molecular imaging technique can be used in a similar manner in the examination of head and neck cancer using CLE, though the diagnostic targets may be different from those in the gastrointestinal tract.[19][22]
Significance edit
CLE can identify the lesions with a small depths of view under the tissue, in contrast to the surface level in conventional endoscopy.[3] It also allows clinicians to discriminate benign or malignant lesions through real-time histological diagnosis by revealing the properties of the lamina at a cellular level.[3][15]
An example is Whipple’s disease.[23] Conventional endoscopy presents a whitish-patterned duodenal mucosa. CLE, in comparison, generates two images –– the superficial images show capillary leak in duodenal mucosa while the deep images show cells of duodenal mucosa, including goblet cells and foamy macrophages in lamina propria. Compared to histological examination of the same duodenal site after periodic acid-Schiff staining, CLE identifies similar patterns of goblet cells and foamy macrophages.[23] CLE can therefore reveal the histological distribution of cells, something conventional endoscopy cannot perform.
Mechanism edit
Basic mechanism edit
The laser emitted by CLE through a pinhole is reflected by the beam splitter or a dichroic mirror and focused by an objective lens. The fluorescent dye in targeted tissue is excited and emits a specific wavelength. The emission from the focal plane of the tissue then is collected by the objective lens and the beam splitter. The laser is eventually filtered by a pinhole to reduce out-of-focus noise to enter the detector or photomultiplier tube.[1]
Fluorescence edit
To excite the tissue for the CLE system, clinicians can apply topical (localised) or intravenous (IV) fluorescence dyes, so that the specific wavelength emitted by the tissue can help practitioners diagnose the tissue.
Topical dyes edit
Cresyl violet and acriflavine can be used as topical dyes. Cresyl violet is a common stain in histology used for light microscopy sections, especially brain sections. In CLE, it can enhance the viewing of the cytoplasm, yet it limits tissue penetration and does not show anything about vasculature. Acriflavine is an antiseptic and dye. In CLE, it can stain the nuclei of GI surface epithelial cells. It is however subjected to cytotoxic and mutagenic properties, in addition to common side effects of irritation.[1]
Intravenous dyes edit
Fluorescein is the most popular IV dye for CLE. Fluorescein is an FDA-cleared dye that is used in ophthalmology clinics in routine as it appears green under cobalt blue light.[10] It is commonly applied topically to identify corneal diseases with slit lamp microscopes including corneal abrasion, ulcers, and infections; or intravenously to identify retinal diseases with angiography including macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. In CLE, it is usually administered intravenously immediately before the intubation of an endoscopic tube. The fluorescence is reported to be the most prominent from a few seconds to 8 minutes.[1] Fluorescein is slowly eliminated; thus the fluorescence slowly decays up to a minimal detectable level after 1 hour, giving a time window for clinicians to investigate.[1]
Recognition and optical flow algorithm edit
CLE’s narrow field of vision makes it difficult for clinicians to identify the location and path of the probe, making it challenging to correspond the image obtained and the lesion location and direction. Research has proposed a crypt recognition algorithm, which predicts the pixel displacement by the moving angle and distance. By restoring the exploration path of CLE, clinicians can locate the sites of interest and improve diagnostic efficiency.[24]
Image quality assessment edit
Research has proposed a new assessment method for filtering images yielded from CLE. As CLE often encounters image distortions, the degradation of image quality and loss of image information, eventually increase the difficulty of accurate diagnosis.[25] A new image quality assessment (IQA) utilising Weber’s Law and local descriptors assesses the quality and filters images with low diagnostic value.[25]
History and development edit
CLE is a modern, in vivo adaptation of confocal microscopy, the microscopic technique invented by Marvin Minsky in 1957.[8]
Since 2004, CLE has been used for observing histopathological changes in gastrointestinal tissues.[8] The usage has been expanded to other organs afterwards.
Limitations edit
The variety of pathology conditions identifiable by CLE is limited.[3] The histological diagnosis is limited to cancerous lesions and inflammation where the number of specific diseases identifiable is not numerous. Moreover, it requires specific training to operate CLE and correctly interpret CLE images, which are rarely used skills by experts in endoscopy.[8][12] Owing to the narrow field of view, the applications of CLE might be restricted.[1] Computer-aided diagnosis with AI technology may be beneficial in diagnosing CLE images.[2]
Fluorescein is the only safe dye approved while cresyl violet and acriflavine are commonly used agents. The lack of choice of contrast agents may limit the application of CLE.[2] For instance, patients allergic to fluorescein should never undergo CLE that involves the use of this intravenous dye.[15]
The optical system is comprised of complex microscopic optical instruments, which are difficult to manufacture and assemble.[2] Therefore, the tool is expensive.[3]
CLE is mostly used in combination with other techniques instead of replacing conventional endoscopy with biopsy.[5] CLE can only serve as a complementary to the traditional biopsy. By sharing the same working channel, conventional biopsy and CLE can be done alternatively by single intubation.[2]
Adverse effects edit
The allergic properties of fluorescein, the common intravenous fluorescent dye for CLE, is the major culprit for the mild adverse events.[11] Intubation is also a contributor to the adverse effects in patients receiving CLE, likewise in conventional endoscopy. Acriflavine, one of the topical dyes, can also cause harm to patients.
Intubation edit
CLE, similar to other diagnostic endoscopic techniques, may give rise to pancreatitis when used to examine the pancreas.[11][26] The likelihood for pancreatitis is especially high in needle-based CLE. The incidence can be minimized by shortening the inspection time and avoiding excessive needle movement within the pancreatic cyst wall.[11]
Fluorescein edit
Mild side effects, which are rare, include
- Nausea
- Vomiting with mild epigastric pain
- Rash at injection site
- Transient hypotension without shock
- Diffuse erythema
These effects are manageable unless patients have prior experiences of them.[1]
Cases of anaphylaxis are reported by ophthalmological uses of fluorescein. Prophylactic use of antihistamines can reduce the chances of allergic reactions or skin prick tests can identify the risk of allergic reactions.[1]
Acriflavine edit
Acriflavine, another contrast agent for CLE, is potentially carcinogenic to humans due to its known mutagenic ability. The dye is therefore not approved by the FDA.[11]
See also edit
References edit
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Pilonis, Nastazja Dagny; Januszewicz, Wladyslaw; di Pietro, Massimiliano (2022). "Confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastro-intestinal endoscopy: technical aspects and clinical applications". Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 7: 7. doi:10.21037/tgh.2020.04.02. PMC 8826043. PMID 35243116.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Zhang, Huahui; He, Zhongyu; Jin, Ziyi; Yan, Qinglai; Wang, Peng; Ye, Xuesong (2022). "The development and clinical application of microscopic endoscopy for in vivo optical biopsies: Endocytoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy". Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 38: 102826. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102826.
- ^ a b c d e f Fugazza, Alessandro; Gaiani, Federica; Carra, Maria Clotilde; Brunetti, Francesco; Lévy, Michaël; Sobhani, Iradj; Azoulay, Daniel; Catena, Fausto; de’Angelis, Gian Luigi; de’Angelis, Nicola (2016). "Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Gastrointestinal and Pancreatobiliary Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". BioMed Research International. 2016: 1–31. doi:10.1155/2016/4638683. ISSN 2314-6133. PMC 4773527. PMID 26989684.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c Han, Wei; Kong, Rui; Wang, Nan; Bao, Wen; Mao, Xinli; Lu, Jie (2023). "Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Detection of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer". Cancers. 15 (3): 776. doi:10.3390/cancers15030776. ISSN 2072-6694. PMC 9913498. PMID 36765734.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b c Vranić, Luka; Nadarević, Tin; Štimac, Davor (2022). "Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Barrett's Esophagus: Just a Scientific Toy or Significant Improvement in Diagnosis?". Digestive Diseases. 40 (1): 97–105. doi:10.1159/000516257. ISSN 0257-2753.
- ^ a b c Wallace, M.; Lauwers, G.; Chen, Y.; Dekker, E.; Fockens, P.; Sharma, P.; Meining, A. (2011). "Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy". Endoscopy. 43 (10): 882–891. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1256632. ISSN 0013-726X.
- ^ a b Canakis, Andrew (2022). "The diagnostic performance of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the detection of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (PDF). Annals of Gastroenterology. doi:10.20524/aog.2022.0741. PMC 9399575. PMID 36061161.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ a b c d e Balañà, Josep; Territo, Angelo; Gallioli, Andrea; Sanguedolce, Francesco; Subiela, José Daniel; Mercadé, Asier; Girón, Irene; Mosquera, Lucía; Gaya, J. M.; Palou, Joan; Breda, Alberto (2019). "Confocal laser endomicroscopy for the treatment of upper urinary tract transitional cellcarcinoma". Archivos Espanoles De Urologia (in Spanish). 72 (8): 765–771. ISSN 0004-0614. PMID 31579035.
- ^ Yang, Hang; Hu, Bing (2021). "Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Recent Advances". Diagnostics. 11 (8): 1305. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11081305. ISSN 2075-4418. PMC 8391489. PMID 34441240.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b Săftoiu, Adrian, ed. (2023). Pocket Guide to Advanced Endoscopy in Gastroenterology. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42076-4. ISBN 978-3-031-42075-7.
- ^ a b c d e Al-Mansour, Mazen R.; Caycedo-Marulanda, Antonio; Davis, Brian R.; Alawashez, Abdulrahim; Docimo, Salvatore; Qureshi, Alia; Tsuda, Shawn (2021). "SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy". Surgical Endoscopy. 35 (5): 2091–2103. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07607-3. ISSN 0930-2794.
- ^ a b Glover, Ben; Teare, Julian; Patel, Nisha (2020). "The Status of Advanced Imaging Techniques for Optical Biopsy of Colonic Polyps". Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology. 11 (3): e00130. doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000130. ISSN 2155-384X. PMC 7145035. PMID 32352708.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Buchner, Anna M (2019). "Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease". Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 25 (8): 1302–1312. doi:10.1093/ibd/izz021. ISSN 1078-0998.
- ^ a b Kim, Do Han; Krishna, Somashekar G.; Coronel, Emmanuel; Kröner, Paul T.; Wolfsen, Herbert C.; Wallace, Michael B.; Corral, Juan E. (2022). "Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in the Diagnosis of Biliary and Pancreatic Disorders: A Systematic Analysis". Clinical Endoscopy. 55 (2): 197–207. doi:10.5946/ce.2021.079. ISSN 2234-2400.
- ^ a b c d Ge, Qi-Chao; Dietrich, Christoph F; Bhutani, Manoop S; Zhang, Bao-Zhen; Zhang, Yue; Wang, Yi-Dan; Zhang, Jing-Jing; Wu, Yu-Fan; Sun, Si-Yu; Guo, Jin-Tao (2021). "Comprehensive review of diagnostic modalities for early chronic pancreatitis". World Journal of Gastroenterology. 27 (27): 4342–4357. doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i27.4342. ISSN 1007-9327.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ Zhou, Selena; Buxbaum, James (2022). "Advanced Imaging of the Biliary System and Pancreas". Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 67 (5): 1599–1612. doi:10.1007/s10620-022-07389-9. ISSN 0163-2116.
- ^ Xia, Yang; Li, Qin; Zhong, Changgao; Wang, Kopen; Li, Shiyue (2023). "Inheritance and innovation of the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions". Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. 14: 204062232211467. doi:10.1177/20406223221146723. ISSN 2040-6223. PMC 9896091. PMID 36743297.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Farahati, Behnaz; Stachs, Oliver; Prall, Friedrich; Stave, Joachim; Guthoff, Rudolf; Pau, Hans Wilhelm; Just, Tino (2010). "Rigid confocal endoscopy for in vivo imaging of experimental oral squamous intra‐epithelial lesions". Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. 39 (4): 318–327. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00841.x. ISSN 0904-2512.
- ^ a b Abbaci, Muriel; Breuskin, Ingrid; Casiraghi, Odile; De Leeuw, Frederic; Ferchiou, Malek; Temam, Stephane; Laplace-Builhé, Corinne (2014). "Confocal laser endomicroscopy for non-invasive head and neck cancer imaging: A comprehensive review". Oral Oncology. 50 (8): 711–716. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.05.002.
- ^ a b Foersch, S.; Kiesslich, R.; Waldner, M. J.; Delaney, P.; Galle, P. R.; Neurath, M. F.; Goetz, M. (2010). "Molecular imaging of VEGF in gastrointestinal cancer in vivo using confocal laser endomicroscopy". Gut. 59 (8): 1046–1055. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.202986. ISSN 0017-5749.
- ^ Choi, Kwi-Sook; Jung, Hwoon-Yong (2014). "Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Molecular Imaging in Barrett Esophagus and Stomach". Clinical Endoscopy. 47 (1): 23. doi:10.5946/ce.2014.47.1.23. ISSN 2234-2400. PMC 3928487. PMID 24570880.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Kakaletri, Irini; Linxweiler, Maximilian; Ajlouni, Serine; Charalampaki, Patra (2022). "Development, Implementation and Application of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Brain, Head and Neck Surgery—A Review". Diagnostics. 12 (11): 2697. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12112697. ISSN 2075-4418. PMC 9689276. PMID 36359540.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ a b Dolak, W.; Leitner, J.; Maresch, J.; Wrba, F.; Mueller, C. (2010). "In vivo identification by confocal laser endoscopy of foamy macrophages associated with Whipple's disease". Endoscopy. 42 (S 02): E310–E311. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1255809. ISSN 0013-726X.
- ^ Yu, Haoxiang; Lu, Yuhua; Liu, Qian (2023). Yu, Chen; Zhou, Jiehan; Song, Xianhua; Lu, Zeguang (eds.). "Ranging of Confocal Endoscopy Probe Using Recognition and Optical Flow Algorithm". Green, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 122–131. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26118-3_9. ISBN 978-3-031-26118-3.
- ^ a b Dong, Xiangjiang; Fu, Ling; Liu, Qian (2022-05-18). "No-reference image quality assessment for confocal endoscopy images with perceptual local descriptor". Journal of Biomedical Optics. 27 (05). doi:10.1117/1.JBO.27.5.056503. ISSN 1083-3668. PMC 9116465. PMID 35585672.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) - ^ Adler, Douglas G. (2015). "Consent, Common Adverse Events, and Post–Adverse Event Actions in Endoscopy". Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 25 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2014.09.001.