This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.


August 2016

edit
  1. The Rankin Gardens & Atrium: PROD; notified RaylynJamesRae (talk · contribs) 04:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
  2. ProperHands: PROD; notified Benkoe (talk · contribs) 13:21, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to be notable yet.
  3. Todd and Clare: PROD; notified Narniakaty15 (talk · contribs) 13:41, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to be notable.
  4. Vernon O’Meally: PROD; notified Alibarker1 (talk · contribs) 05:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No sources apart from a page by his gallery. Article is very promotional and may have been written by a COI editor.

September 2016

edit
  1. Caslon Roman: PROD; notified Tarikash (talk · contribs) 05:37, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: I've decided that this isn't really notable. It's really a bit of a demo product for FontForge, which is notable in its own right. Also on aesthetic grounds it's a odd clunky font - oddly balanced and looking like an amateur project - that doesn't seem to have ever been used anywhere notable.
  2. Castilic: PROD; notified Sir Fairness (talk · contribs) 21:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: I can't see any evidence that this term has ever been used in writing about architecture. Seems to fail WP:ESSAY and WP:OPINION.
  3. Jessica Shortall: BLP PROD; notified Taraabrahams (talk · contribs) 20:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
  4. United States National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security: PROD; notified Atzilit (talk · contribs) 20:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No third-party sources. Governments write position papers all the time, and few are notable. Looking through news websites and Google Books, I can find sources on other countries' such commitments, but nothing substantial on the United States'.
  5. U.S. Global Strategy to Empower Adolescent Girls: PROD; notified Dessie92 (talk · contribs) 20:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Very little third-party coverage and I can't find any more. Governments produce position papers on their plans and funding criteria all the time - few such documents are individually notable, although sections of this article may be good to add to articles on specific government bodies or issues that the plan tries to combat. Claim that the plan is based primarily on International Center for Research on Women isn't sourced, so this may fail WP:SYNTHESIS.
  6. Jill Andrews: BLP PROD; notified Oliviaqueen (talk · contribs) 22:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
  7. The UC Berkeley Management, Entrepreneurship and Technology (M.E.T) Program: PROD; notified Patty Weng (talk · contribs) 22:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Individual degree programme. Doesn't seem to be notable - indeed, hasn't admitted any students yet.
  8. People Power Company: PROD; notified Ronnie2897 (talk · contribs) 16:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No particular evidence of notability - pretty much just trade-press write-ups. Article is also ludicrously obviously self-authored, extending to things like the band the CEO and CTO play in!
  9. Sidney Schutte: BLP PROD; notified Laura van der Velden (talk · contribs) 16:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  10. SOAPSTone Analysis: PROD; notified King07828 (talk · contribs) 16:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability - one teaching method among many.
  11. Peter Van Hoesen: BLP PROD; notified Aeneasvb (talk · contribs) 16:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
  12. Gothenburg Studios: PROD; notified Henkemeister (talk · contribs) 16:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No non-self-authored references.
  13. William Landles: PROD; notified Mac.HJM23 (talk · contribs) 14:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason:
  14. Apresys: PROD; notified Come5117 (talk · contribs) 00:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of significance
  15. Andrew Mbaruk: BLP PROD; notified Williamrowley (talk · contribs) 16:19, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
  16. Flymore: PROD; notified Idkfawin32 (talk · contribs) 16:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Absolutely zero evidence of notability.
  17. The Senator's Youngest Daughter: PROD; notified Hockey1212 (talk · contribs) 19:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No review coverage.
  18. YBuySell: PROD; notified Mihirmalani (talk · contribs) 05:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence or claim of notability.
  19. Monte Carlo Vodka: PROD; notified Montecarlovodka (talk · contribs) 05:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to be notable apart from one medal.
  20. Human Monoculture: PROD; notified Codestoned (talk · contribs) 05:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
  21. John Henry Seale: PROD; notified Sirkiwi123 (talk · contribs) 12:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No source apart from the history website of a local pub and this contemporary directory of baronets says the birth date is wrong, so that doesn't sound very trustworthy. I can't find any secondary sources as to notability.
  22. Corp of Cadets: PROD; notified Brhscorps (talk · contribs) 16:18, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: School marching band. No evidence of notability.
  23. Appleton Institute: PROD; notified Skosmad (talk · contribs) 23:34, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to be a notable department in its own right: I can't find independent coverage of it. Seems to fail WP:BRANCH.
  24. Carmen Reyes: BLP PROD; notified Nathrey (talk · contribs) 03:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
  25. Cold-energy battery: PROD; notified Droffski (talk · contribs) 11:42, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

edit
  1. MPA/ID: PROD; notified Maa2017 (talk · contribs) 17:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Non-notable individual course.
  2. Frank Wilder: PROD; notified Jshulz109 (talk · contribs) 15:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Well. I can indeed find some brief references to Mr. Wilder being a jewellery designer, but claims that he is really a billionaire Silicon Valley investor are nowhere to be seen in these sources. I believe some or all of this article to be false, but I'm putting a PROD tag rather than a CSD tag on in case someone can prove me wrong.
  3. The Home Wreckers Club: PROD; notified R1ngo1981 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No indication of significance.
  4. All Saints Episcopal: PROD; notified 2015corgi (talk · contribs) 21:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Primary school, no indication of significance.
  5. Sue Ellen Randolph: PROD; notified Neuerthewall (talk · contribs) 18:04, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence that this person is notable.
  6. Pine Bay Library: PROD; notified Sergiozygmunt (talk · contribs) 06:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: In-joke at a company. I see no evidence that this is notable enough for its own Wikipedia article, and the company doesn't have a Wikipedia article either.
  7. Patrick A. Salvi: PROD; notified Vandrek (talk · contribs) 10:56, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Promotional Wikipedia article. Lawyer seems to be somewhat known but of no particular notability.
  8. Chris Salvi: PROD; notified 24trump (talk · contribs) 10:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nothing here that indicates WP:NCOLLATH. Part of a group of articles on marginally notable members of the Salvi family.
  9. Calgary Police Cadets: PROD; notified Biggart (talk · contribs) 22:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of significance. Website is dead.
  10. Sheraton Grand Bangalore at Brigade Gateway: PROD; notified Abmprofessional (talk · contribs) 23:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No indication of notability.
  11. Tyler Alexander Allen: PROD; notified Taallen92 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sounds like a very impressive early career, but this article is self-authored, violating WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and WP:ACADEMIC. Perhaps wait until someone else writes an article about you.
  12. Jason Seiken: PROD; notified AdamKaz (talk · contribs) 03:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Very, very obviously self-authored article entirely written in a self-promotional tone that is synthesis rather than reporting what sources say about the subject (for example crediting claimed successes as this person's work, citing a source that never mentions them). While this person may be borderline notable, they haven't held the top position at any of their workplaces and redeeming this article's content to become non-promotional looks impossible. Deletion seems the safe answer.
  13. Market st Harcourt: PROD; notified Eksgro (talk · contribs) 03:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sorry, but an individual street likely isn't itself notable.

December 2016

edit
  1. University Catholic Center at UCLA (UCC): PROD; notified Tsteen350 (talk · contribs) 15:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of significance.
  2. Nasstar: PROD; notified Lauralouise90 (talk · contribs) 19:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability. Text is highly promotional. Only references are trade-media articles that are basically rewritten press releases.

February 2017

edit
  1. Wilson Architects: PROD; notified Chris Herden (talk · contribs) 04:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Self-authored article, no citations to external websites.
  2. M3architecture: PROD; notified Martynaatlindyjohnson (talk · contribs) 04:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Self-authored article, text is almost entirely a list of largely regional industry awards.
  3. Lexia Readable: PROD; notified Greenglen (talk · contribs) 00:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I just don't see any evidence this font is notable due to external coverage. Also, the benefits of dyslexic fonts are very debatable, so I'm not sure we should be suggesting that this has benefits there.
  4. Christopher Thorogood: PROD; notified Christhorogood (talk · contribs) 00:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Autobiography - no non self-authored sources. From your career it sounds like you have a lot of expertise and we'd love to see you contribute to Wikipedia, but this fails WP:NOTLINKEDIN. You're welcome to put this content on your user page if you plan to make other edits, though.
  5. Shasta marina resort: PROD; notified Ccatlett1972 (talk · contribs) 02:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No independent sources.
  6. Lindell Smith: PROD; notified Julian tabbitt (talk · contribs) 02:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Local town councillor, not notable by WP:POL besides a small amount of local news coverage.
  7. VIPLE: PROD; notified Smengi94 (talk · contribs) 02:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Programming language project - no independent media coverage, just a few articles and conference presentations. Seems to fail WP:MADEUP, although I'm open to persuasion.
  8. Shane Curran (computer scientist): PROD; notified Magicmonkeys (talk · contribs) 02:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: High-school student. This is an impressive CV so far, but doesn't match the sustained notability criteria. I tend to feel it's best to have articles on smart kids after they've grown up and started a career, not when they're in high school.
  9. Oliver James George: PROD; notified JimForrester (talk · contribs) 03:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I can't find any sources specifically about this person at all.
  10. Currambine Primary School: PROD; notified WikiWizz123123 (talk · contribs) 03:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Primary school - non-notable, no unusual features or third-party sources.
  11. Cloud as Code: PROD; notified Sabapathyce (talk · contribs) 03:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No sources
  12. Jeremiah Emmanuel: PROD; notified EstherJDaniel (talk · contribs) 03:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: High-school student. This is an impressive CV so far, but doesn't match the sustained notability criteria. I tend to feel it's best to have articles on smart kids after they've grown up and started a career, not when they're in high school.
  13. Rustic Pathways: PROD; notified Benzakai (talk · contribs) 07:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Advertisement.
  14. Litten (Pokemon): PROD; notified TheRealAzza (talk · contribs) 21:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of significance, lists of Pokemon cover this topic
  15. Sheena Bhattessa: PROD; notified Sheenabhattessa (talk · contribs) 21:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Self-authored article on an actress. No in-depth sources yet, just reviews and articles on productions which name her. Could be notable eventually, but not yet.
  16. The Jerd Project: PROD; notified Thejerdproject (talk · contribs) 21:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No non self-authored sources.
  17. Doug Kazé: BLP PROD; notified Khalil West (talk · contribs) 22:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
  18. Spacial Web: PROD; notified Tao Baifan (talk · contribs) 12:55, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I can't find any sources that discuss this.
  19. Westfield view: PROD 21:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I can't find any details of this place or the competition at all. Potential hoax.
  20. Rational numerals: PROD; notified Turdus~enwiki (talk · contribs) 13:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No third-party sources showing that this system is used by anyone. Citations cited are either to the system's author, Armands Strazds, who apparently invented it as a high school student, or do not mention it.
  21. Intellectual Bigot / Intellectual Bigotry: PROD; notified Bruce Metzger (talk · contribs) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

edit
  1. Raja Goutham: BLP PROD; notified Harikirangupta (talk · contribs) 07:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
  2. CREATE Program: PROD; notified Tjzhjw (talk · contribs) 08:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Promotional text, no non-self-authored sources.

April 2017

edit
  1. The Wife of Bath’s Tale: PROD; notified BrittanyK678 (talk · contribs) 11:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sorry, but this is a duplicate of our pre-existing article The Wife of Bath's Tale. You're welcome to add information to that page.

May 2017

edit
  1. Frances Lowe: PROD; notified Parker48 (talk · contribs) 22:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence that this person really existed besides their being featured in an art project. Probable hoax.

July 2017

edit
  1. Fairfax (typeface): PROD; notified Rowan03 (talk · contribs) 20:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No evidence of notability, only source is its designer's website.
  2. Constructium: PROD; notified Rowan03 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: No real evidence of notability such as reviews and extensive coverage, only sources are the author's website and a font design compendium quoting that website.

August 2017

edit
  1. Arcana Academy: PROD; notified Arcana101academy (talk · contribs) 05:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: On balance doesn't seem to have notability besides having a weird logo and getting some attention for making its female employees dress up in pervy costumes for the staff photo. A few mentions in lists of active companies in its sector but no sustained coverage. Self-authored article, unsurprisingly.
  2. Maylene Williamson: PROD; notified MayWill (talk · contribs) 23:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
  3. Social Trekking: PROD; notified Musayyab Qazi (talk · contribs) 03:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails WP:NEOLOGISM. I can't find any references to this term apart from a company with this name.

September 2017

edit
  1. Horeb, Llanelli: PROD; notified Rhedyn2 (talk · contribs) 19:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
  2. Short Interspersed Elements: PROD; notified Mariuswalter (talk · contribs) 16:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
  3. Short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs): PROD; notified Omaraljammal (talk · contribs) 19:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Duplicates the article Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs). We've ended up with three articles on this topic and I know that this is the largest, but I'm tagging it for deletion nonetheless so we keep the senior article on this topic.

October 2017

edit
  1. Josie Badger: PROD; notified Catiercohn (talk · contribs) 06:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to meet notability standard of WP:BIO. While there are sources, most of them are passing mentions, official bios etc.
  2. Eva Tansky Blum: PROD; notified Aguadagnino (talk · contribs) 06:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. Although she is notable for being the first woman to hold her position, it's not a particularly famous one and the citations aren't very in-depth.
  3. Aradhna Oliphant: PROD; notified Aguadagnino (talk · contribs) 07:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Not sure this person meets WP:BIO. Most of the sources aren't very in-depth and the organisation she leads doesn't have an article.
  4. Janera Solomon: PROD; notified Aguadagnino (talk · contribs) 07:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. Only one source and the theatre she runs is a small local theatre with a capacity of 350.
  5. Betty Kellett Nadeau: PROD; notified Josephkellam (talk · contribs) 06:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Reason: I'm afraid I don't think this person meets WP:BIO or WP:PROF. I just can't find significant coverage of this person, or her husband E.H. Nadeau anywhere besides some papers and citations and brief references like thanks in acknowledgements. The article text is very specialised and it doesn't convince me that this person is well-known in her field.

March 2018

edit
  1. Operation Brand: PROD; notified Cramyourspam (talk · contribs) 00:35, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
    • Reason: While my search is hampered by the range of possible translations, I simply can't find any secondary-source scholarship about this topic at all. Every cited source is an extract from the same primary-source interview with a single eyewitness (who himself apparently says he only heard about it secondhand) apart from 2) which mentions it only in passing. Wikipedia doesn't seem to already have coverage of it either anywhere (I've searched now for "Einsatz Brand", "Einsatzbrand", "Einsatz-Brand", "Operation Brand" and "Operation Burning".)

Given the huge volume of Holocaust scholarship, I'm inclined to believe that either this is just an urban legend or an event that did happen but had a different official name to this one. Either way it doesn't meet notability criteria.

July 2018

edit
  1. Anthony Esposito: BLP PROD; notified Extraordinary Machine (talk · contribs) 21:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

edit
  1. Human Enhancement( Technological Enhancement): PROD; notified Msus18 (talk · contribs) 00:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

edit
  1. Harmful influence of technology: PROD; notified Petro Skrypnyk (talk · contribs) 01:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

edit
  1. Spatial propagation of radial ERK distribution: PROD; notified Olivialiautaud (talk · contribs) 23:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
    • Reason: Seems to fail WP:OR, WP:OPINION and (more loosely) WP:ONESOURCE. This term doesn't seem to be in common use-I can only find it in one of the citations, and not in any third-party sources, and despite cleanup the article isn't integrated with any other material on Wikipedia at all well. I think a more appropriate place for this content could be the ERK article.

April 2019

edit
  1. Gemma La Guardia Gluck: PROD; notified Lycheeberries (talk · contribs) 22:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
    • Reason: This person is notable, but the article is a disaster, it seems just to be the Italian-language article run through Google Translate (hence the points when the subject, a woman, is referred to as a man). WP:TNT.

May 2019

edit
  1. Johnson's walrus: PROD; notified ThomasMiller150 (talk · contribs) 20:58, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
    • Reason: Fails verification-likely hoax. Neither of the claimed links is valid. Googling "odobenus johnsonus" and "Johnson's walrus" both find no hits whatsoever. Even if a genuine claimed species, it's likely a misidentification/fringe theory.

June 2019

edit
  1. Journal of Nursing Management: PROD; notified Shivoconnor (talk · contribs) 18:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
    • Reason: Citations 1, 2 and 3 all fail to verify the stated facts they're claimed to verify, let alone proving notability. The only third-party source is an impact-factor calculation.

November 2019

edit
  1. Comparison of Macintosh models: PROD; notified Baryonic Being (talk · contribs) 23:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
    • Reason: I feel this article has failed in its purpose: it's both not hugely necessary and has failed in the task it was set up to do. Apple's product matrix is covered well in the main Macintosh article. It means there's quite large dividing lines between its models (generally, people know if they want a Mac Mini, iMac or Mac Pro), and where there are overlaps this is generally much better covered by review websites that can do speed comparisons than by a fairly meaningless set of tables as here (hey, what's the difference between "Intel HD Graphics 515" and "Intel Iris Graphics 540"? Which one's better?). I feel the article would only be useful if it was embraced by the editing community as important and the subject of regular updates, but there seems no interest in it (e.g. nobody's taken out the references to the discontinued MacBook, or put in much about the iMac Pro), whereas the articles on individual product lines are regularly updated by interested contributors. I favour either deleting the article or merging/redirecting to Macintosh, which could or already does hold most of the content of this rather short article fairly easily in a place where it's more likely to get attention and regular updates.
  2. Quantum Psychology: PROD; notified M.C. ArZeCh (talk · contribs) 02:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

edit
  1. Edward C. Moore (silversmith): PROD; notified NotButtigieg (talk · contribs) 03:38, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Duplicate of the Edward Chandler Moore article. This article is actually better cited, so I'm proposing for deletion so there's time to copy citations and content over.
  2. Våler, Norway: PROD; notified Redriv (talk · contribs) 04:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Cut-and-paste move of Våler, Hedmark, apparently due to a local government reorganisation moving the municipality from Hedmark to Innlandet region. I've tried to clarify with page creator but haven't had a response yet. Might be appropriate to move that article to this location but I don't understand Norwegian so can't confidently say.
  3. Os, Norway: PROD; notified Redriv (talk · contribs) 04:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: Cut-and-paste move of Os, Hedmark, apparently due to a local government reorganisation moving the municipality from Hedmark to Innlandet region. I've tried to clarify with page creator but haven't had a response yet. Might be appropriate to move that article to this location but I don't understand Norwegian so can't confidently say.
  4. Van Leer House: PROD; notified Billywayne911 (talk · contribs) 18:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: This article has major sourcing problems to the point that, while I don't think it's a hoax, I honestly couldn't confidently say it's not one. The NRHP reference # on the infobox, the key evidence of notability, is for a different place, and none of the other sources prove notability. They're mostly a self-published blog, apart from this, which has no detail at all, one link which is broken, and this, which looks legit, but gives a slightly different address to the house to where I find it on Google Street View (page author/the blog claim it's at 700 Hedgerow Drive, but this source says it's on Sproul Road, although it's close enough that I can believe suburban buildup would make a more precise address possible now than in 1962). Asked for more information from page creator, but haven't had a reply.

March 2020

edit
  1. Angailica: PROD; notified Gfin2302 (talk · contribs) 23:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
    • Reason: No extensive sources; IMDB isn't a reliable source as it can be user-edited. Google Books finds me Fantastic Cinema Subject Guide and The Gorehound's Guide to Splatter Films of the 1980s which verifies that this person exists, but neither is an in-depth source on her career.