Hi Al-Bargit.
One change you made on Voiceless alveolar affricate actually sets the wrong character sequence ts͡ for t͡s. See the note at the bottom of the section International_Phonetic_Alphabet#Affricates and double articulation. Cheers. --moyogo 13:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello
editPlaese add your coments Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#molecular_gentic_as_.22pseudoscience.22
- or, perhaps you may want to reconsider your edit ?
- Nasz 19:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thanks; it's no problem, reverts are cheap, and I'm about through with warning Nasz now. dab (𒁳) 19:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you like to look at my talk page? There is answer to your uncertainty / question, also I have ther one a question to you. Or do you prefer to post it here?
- Nasz 21:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Your comments about Awareness Loves Life
editHello Al-Bargit.
My name is Frank O'Collins and I notice you made a supportive comment for the deletion of the reference to Awareness Loves Life.
I am the author of http://one-islam.org
As you are someone who prides themselves in being supportive of both knowledge as well as the noble religion of Islam, I am suprised you did not take a few seconds to research who I am.
Maybe you did and you feel I am not worthy of such references. Maybe you feel I am someone who writes false references. I have certainly removed all words that appear to be self promotion.
I merely have taken the time out of respect to you, to alert you to who I am and what I do.
I wish you well.
Frank O'Collins
- Architect of Ucadia 05:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to the Slavs
editI noticed just seconds ago that you made a change to the Slavs' introdution, removing the "non-" from "linguistic" and "ethnic". By coincidence, I spotted that same thing and was about to change it myself and suddenly thought, "where has it gone?", it turns out that you'd done it!! Remarkable since that act of vandalism was committed on 26 February, exactly a week ago. The anon. who put that there was trying to be amusing as he also wrote "and Canada" for something which included the countries Ukraine and Poland, which you'll see if you look now (literally seconds later), I have changed myself. I just thought that it is remarkable how we both noticed something so late and yet the same time! Evlekis 16:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Pronunciation
edit- Generally speaking, pronunciation instructions appear next to the word they define. Any particular reason you reverted my edit in Chlamydia to reflect this? -- MarcoTolo 20:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Historical Eastern Germany
editI think you'll be quite interested in this:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move. -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 04:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Aslam O Alaikum
editNice to see your user page and contributions. Keep up the good work, Jazak Allah --Webkami 09:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have put your name at my user page. Please tell me if you do not like it or change my user page yourself. Wassalam . --- ALM 12:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Improper condemnation
editTo the User:Al-Bargit, This is the user for Kalintor. I am very annoyed that you sent me a message saying that I had vandalised an important page to you. I am aware of what was changed, but that has no inclination that it was indeed me; I leave my wikipedia account logged in at all times which I have now revised due to persistent vandalism on my friend's part. They have no respect for other people. This is not an excuse and I highly doubt you believe me in what I am saying. The point is that I created an account on wikipedia to make correct and useful changes to pages that are important to me. I am sorry if offence was caused on Kalintor's account, but you must remember, what is written on a computer screen that one can read is most likely slander or unreliable information. If someone is in control of your account then they can do whatever they want and it brings down the good name of the account per sa.
Dude, underlined "T" is most definitely NOT the "standard"[sic] transliteration of the Arabic letter ث . Underlined "T" is used in SOME (by no means all) Semitological transcription practices, but more because it was a convenient symbol to produce with typewriters or daisy-wheel printers than because it was the best possible symbol. And furthermore, as a simple practical matter, underlined "T" can be quite ambiguous -- in an Indological context, it could mean a retroflex consonant, while in transcribing Australian Aborigine languages, it could refer to a place of articulation along the dental / alveolar etc. continuum. Even within the Semitological realm, underlining is sometimes used as a symbol for emphatic consonants (not fricatives) -- so that underlined "T" could mean ط not ث . Furthermore Wikipedia does have official Arabic transcription style guidelines, and I'm pretty sure that they don't recommend using underlined "T" for ث (sorry I don't have location at hand at the moment).
And also, in a phrase such as ˤĪdu l-Mīlād , the "u" vowel is the nominative case vowel of the word عيد -- it is not morphologically part of the definite article. AnonMoos
Salam Alaykum
edit
|
adoption!
Aminullah/Archive! I'm Sa.vakilian, one of the adopter of Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! If you want to be a good Wikipedian, I can help you with wikipedia rules and styles.
← Sa.vakilian(t-c)--16:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
In addition I invite you to participate in Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam and you can ask your religious questions from me.
Allah
editSalam alaykum.
I corrected its content, however it will be deleted very soon.Sa.vakilian(t-c)--09:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Qur'an. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nomen NescioGnothi seauton 17:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Chechnya userbox and Grozny
editRegarding this edit, please do not remove deletion nomination, as this falls under Vandalism instead raise a process if you want to keep it, although its existance does breach wikipedian policies and it has been previously deleted several times.
Wrt this edit please review Naming conventions and realise that the first name is given under the parent de jure and de facto country irrespective of its ethnical, liguiphone composition or political mentality. Thank you. --Kuban Cossack 14:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Correct Chechen spelling
editThe correct spelling for "Death" in Chechen is 1ожалла. I made a note and it is now corrected. Chechenka 18:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I would like to learn your beautiful language. Al-Bargit 18:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Salam!
editSalam my friend! Welcome to the Chechen Portal! Good to see your contribution there for the latin alphabet. Also, have you checked out the ce.wikipedia.org chechen wikipedia? We are active and making articles now, so if your chechen is good, please feel free to write and make an account! :) If you want to learn Chechen, contact me on MSN or Skype and I can help you with some resources, no problem! Hope to work with you soon more! (Dzien dobrý?) hehe. And may Allah be with you! --Ice201 19:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Template:User:Al-Bargit/Userboxes/Anti communist
editThen I am putting your template for anti communist for speedy deletion. If one person opposes something then the recipricol should be allowed. You might be against communism and I find that offensive, so I am for communism and you might find that offensive. So either both boxes or non is the neutral setting! --Ice201 20:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Chehcnya
editThe reason why it is not POV is because that is the tone that is used by the United Nations, they recognise Chechnya as part of Russia. Moreover in your comment and I quote ...there used to be an independent... Therefore it does not exist anymore, the current citizens of Chechnya, by default, are also Russian citizens, thus it is valid to assume that they are also integrally part of Russia and hence when viewing their land macroscopically they too will use the term. Now whether they do so or not is a POV and Original Research. Thus assuming that all Chechens still wish independence is a like POV, just like you would assume there would be politicians in Russia who wish to grant it so.
Finally when we describe Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Trans-Dniester, we use the terms break-away, which is fully suitable in using the de jure talk of the UN. However even I myself am not insisting on inserting those terms when describing the terrorist rule of the Ichkerian regime and the de facto condition of Chechnya in 1996-99. If you disagree with me on any of those points instead of reverting me why not start a WP:DR and go from there. --Kuban Cossack 15:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well a) Russia is not going to invade Lithuania, and for that information during the Soviet times some of the countries did not recognise the annexation of Lithuania into the Soviet Union b) whether or not the UN was neutral is your POV not a neutral one. Once again please stop adding this unneutral text into the page, you think it is, that is your POV. I think its not. You are the one that wants to go against the set regulations, you file a WP:DR because continued edit-warring will only get you blocked. --Kuban Cossack 18:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Chechen language
editThe Chechen-English, English-Chechen Dictionary by Nicholas Awde and Muhammad Galaev mentions the "r" has being rolled as in Scottish English. Azalea pomp 18:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Retirement
editHuh? -- <FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 18:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Read: WP:No personal attacks. On what basis do you claim I'm aggressive? Because I keep reverting your poorly written contributions? I'm not the only one neither I was the one that banned you from the Polish Wikipedia.Al-Bargit 15:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- My opinion is that you do not understand the language you reading. Nasz 20:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Haha, this is pretty funny. Al-Bargit, you deleted my communist box and you were allowed to keep yours. I would love to support you on this, but frankly, you are a victim of what you complain against. I left English Wiki for reasons stated on my userpage. This is a bias community. You will always have people like Kuban on the English wiki who are obsessed with quoting rules to always get the Sysops side, no matter how hypocritical it is. Remember always, History is written by the winners, unfortunately, Chechnya will never have its say of what happened or their side, because they are still under unfortunately Russian control. Anyway, good luck with your retirement of English Wiki, it feels great being able to put time into Icelandic and Chechen wikis, ones who truly stand for neutrality. --Ice201 04:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
hello
edithello Al-Bargit.. could you please explain this puzzling edit? thank you. ITAQALLAH 20:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
welcome back
editWelcome back my brother. I hope you will help in improving wikipedia article on Islam. We need lot of help. Wassalam --- A. L. M. 11:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Sharia law picture
editYour reason for removing this image (see right) from Sharia is not valid. Do you have a better reason than "Sharia is more than corporal punishments"?. thanks. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 18:39, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think sharī`ah is being misunderstood in the West. Many people associate it only with the corporal punishments. If Wikipedia is to be neutral, it must show the positive aspects of sharī`ah laws. This is the most complete legal system on the Earth, as it deals with matters as diverse as alcohol, pornography, homosexuality and inheritance. If a Westerner sees this image, he will be so disgusted that he will not be willing to admit any good sides of it. Of course, criticism of sharī`ah must also be mentioned (I'd even expand this section).Aminullah 18:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Sources
editSalaam Aminallah,
I saw your edit to Islam article. Thanks for that. I thought it might be helpful if you could take a look at the following link about the sources: [1], or here User:Aminz/sources. --Aminz 20:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Aminullah,
I was wondering if you can help me with this article(Historicity of Muhammad). I have already written something but it is far from being a good article (Wikipedia:Good articles). My english is not so good and I make lots of grammatical mistakes (and you are good in combating that ;) ). We also need to rewrite the intro per WP:Lead. The article has too many quotes which are needed to be re-written in our words. If you can help, that would be great. Another article you might want to work on is Early reforms under Islam. There too, we need to reword things and improve its flow. --Aminz 20:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Qur'an templates
editHi,
Thanks for using the new template. Please continue to do so when you add new citations. However, I intend to do a search/replace with AWB once I get approved which should be easier than doing it by hand. Currently, the Quran-* templates are redirected to use Cite Quran.
Regards,
→ AA (talk • contribs) — 13:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! You saved a lot of my time! Aminullah 13:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Check user procedure
editYou recently compiled and listed a case at request for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has asked that you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the request for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed in a timely manner. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. -- lucasbfr talk 13:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
answering-christianity
editI notice you linked the article on Christianity to this. Do you really think it a good idea? Essentially it seems to be a rather strongly POV/attack site. There are comparable "anti" sites on other religions but we don't generally list them on the main pages for the article, and I think it would be a bad thing if we did... e.g. at Islam. I haven't removed the link for now but I would invite you to do so. --BozMo talk 19:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply, but please think carefully. I did not say anything was offensive (not to me anyway) nor did I mention NPOV rules. At present all the contraversy issues around accusations of apartheid in Islam etc are off the main Islam page and put in separate pages on contraversy. Do you think that it is a good idea to include on the main pages on religions links to sites which only exist to criticise them? The link is already at Criticism_of_Christianity which corresponds to Criticism_of_Islam for Islam.--BozMo talk 20:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hindu views on monotheism
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Hindu views on monotheism, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Buddhipriya 20:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Allah in Indonesian
editBasically this is a copy of what I wrote in Allah (discussion), replying your doubt.
I was born and raised in Indonesia. Indonesian does not have proper plural form (normally it is done by repeating the word twice, but does not applies to all words). I have several friends who were Buddhist, and Hindus, and they DO use the world Allah, which is alternative form of Tuhan, which means God or Gods. I am a Roman Catholic and of Chinese descend, and we do use word "Allah", and so did my ancestors, who are/were Cunfucianism and Buddhist. I agree that Buddhist and Hindus does not use "Allah" as often as Muslims, Protestants, and Roman Catholics. Hope this clarify it.--w_tanoto 15:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Vishnu, Brahma, or Buddha is different case. In Hinduism, the normally used word is Dewa (ie, Dewa Wisnu -->Vishnu), not Tuhan, not Allah. While Buddha, they call him simply Buda or Buddha or Budha (the spellings are not standarised). Tuhan and Allah are generally accepted as Indonesian word for God in all religions recognised, especially in inter-religious relations. I can't really find a direct translation of Dewa from Indonesian to English, but according to Indonesian dictionary installed on my laptop, you can say that "Dewa" is the same as "Idol" in English. Yes, as I said, Allah is less common in religions you mentioned, but nevertheless, still used.--w_tanoto 17:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, it came from sanskrit. Thanks for the info... I don't know the direct translation for that. I just said what my dictionary said. I agree it is offensive, as idol is also used in Indonesian sometimes for some dead items that is regarded as God (i.e. statue, stone).--w_tanoto 18:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)